WPR19LA006
2018-10-09 · Cape Girardeau, Missouri, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport CGI
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper landing flare in gusting crosswind conditions, his failure to conduct a go-around, and his failure to maintain directional control, which resulted in a runway departure and nose-over.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn October 9, 2018, about 1050 central daylight time, an experimental amateur-built Vans Aircraft Inc. RV-6A, N451JP, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. The pilot was fatally injured, and the pilot-rated passenger sustained serious injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 personal flight. According to a witness located at the airport, the airplane landed "a little long," then bounced "hard" upon touchdown, before bouncing two more times. Immediately following the third bounce, the nose landing gear folded back, and the airplane nosed over. The passenger stated that the pilot mentioned that he was going to land "a little faster" and not use flaps due to the wind. The passenger further stated that the pilot had trouble straightening the airplane when it touched down the first time. The airplane touched down on the right side of the runway, bounced "pretty high," then landed in a right crab before it "shot off the right side of the runway" and subsequently nosed over. The airplane came to rest about 1,750 ft from the approach end of runway 20 and about 25 ft off to the right side of the runway. The witness statements were consistent with onboard GPS data and an airport surveillance video. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe pilot held an experimental aircraft builder repairman certificate. The pilot had completed the requirements of BasicMed. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONAccording to the kit manufacturer, due to the differences in each airplane built, the Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH) is the responsibility of the aircraft's builder/owner, and data such as reference speeds and crosswind limitations should be compiled from flight tests of each specific airplane. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONThe recorded weather conditions at Cape Girardeau Regional Airport (CGI), Cape Girardeau, Missouri, at 1050 included wind from 150° at 12 knots with gusts to 20 knots. Based on this observation, the crosswind component for landing on runway 20 was between about 9 knots and 15 knots, depending on the gust factor. AIRPORT INFORMATIONAccording to the kit manufacturer, due to the differences in each airplane built, the Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH) is the responsibility of the aircraft's builder/owner, and data such as reference speeds and crosswind limitations should be compiled from flight tests of each specific airplane. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONAll flight control surfaces remained attached to the airplane. Flight control continuity was established from the cockpit to all flight control surfaces. The elevator trim was observed in the neutral position and operated normally. The aileron trim was in the neutral position. The aileron trim operated normally with no anomalies noted. Examination of the brakes and tires revealed no anomalies. The engine and all associated engine components and accessories were present. The crankshaft was manually rotated at the propeller and rotational continuity was established throughout the engine, accessory section, and valve train. During crankshaft rotation, thumb compression and suction were attained on all cylinders. A borescope inspection of the cylinders revealed normal operating signatures. The engine was run at various power settings with no anomalies noted. ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONThe FAA Airplane Flying Handbook, Chapter 8, Approaches and Landings, states: When the airplane contacts the ground with a sharp impact as the result of an improper attitude or an excessive rate of sink, it tends to bounce back in the air... Extreme caution and alertness must be exercised any time a bounce occurs, but particularly when there is a crosswind… When one main wheel of the airplane strikes the runway, the other wheel touches down immediately afterwards, and the wings become level. Then with no crosswind correction as the airplane bounces, the wind causes the airplane to roll with the wind, thus exposing even more surface to the crosswind and drifting the airplane more rapidly.…When a bounce is severe, the safest procedure is to execute a go-around immediately. Guidance provided by the kit manufacturer regarding flight test procedures stated that "If you should accidently hit hard enough to cause a sharp bounce back into the air, apply power and make a go-around for another landing attempt." It further stated that "It is probably better to start over rather than to salvage a bad landing out of an abnormal condition (bouncing back into the air at an unusual attitude or speed)." MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATIONAn autopsy of the pilot was not performed due to his organ donor status. Toxicology testing performed at the FAA's Forensic Sciences Laboratory was negative for ethanol and tested-for drugs. The pilot and passenger were landing in gusting crosswind conditions following a local flight. The passenger stated that the airplane touched down on the right side of the runway, bounced several times, departed the right side of the runway, and subsequently nosed over; a witness on the ground also watched the airplane bounce, depart the runway surface, and nose over in the grass. Weather observations indicated a left crosswind component between 9 and 15 knots about the time of the accident. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation, and the accident is consistent with the pilot's failure to attain a proper landing flare in gusting crosswind conditions, which resulted in the bounced landing, during which he failed to conduct a go-around. Subsequently, he did not maintain directional control, which resulted in the runway departure and nose-over. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- F Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot - F
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Wind-Crosswind-Ability to respond/compensate
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Directional control-Not attained/maintained
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Landing flare-Not attained/maintained
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2018_WPR19LA006.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…