WPR19LA102
2019-03-31 · Placerville, California, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PVF
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The partial loss of engine power due to an improperly maintained carburetor.
Factual narrative
On March 31, 2019, about 1630 Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 172L, N7033Q, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Placerville, California. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. The pilot reported that after departing the traffic pattern, the engine began to run rough. He checked the throttle position, mixture control, fuel tank selection, and engine oil pressure. He then turned on the carburetor heat and the roughness increased without an increase in engine speed. The airplane was about 1,500 to 2,000 ft above ground level (agl) and the pilot decided to return to the airport for landing. The airplane was not able to maintain altitude and landed in trees about 300 ft short of the approach end of runway 23. Postaccident examination revealed that both fuel tanks and the gascolator were full of fuel, and all fuel lines were secure and unobstructed. The engine air inlet filter was free of debris, and all the internal passages of the filter box and carburetor heat ducting were clear. The engine contained 7 quarts of oil (maximum 8) and there was no evidence of catastrophic engine failure. The propeller blades along with the engine and its ancillary components did not appear to sustain any evidence of impact damage. The inner surface of the exhaust pipe appeared coated in black soot, and similar sooting was present on the electrodes of all spark plugs. The data tag for the carburetor had partially worn away such that the manufacturer could not be determined, although it appeared to be of the Marvel-Schebler type, with a part number of 4SPA and serial number 10-3678-12. Further examination revealed evidence of a fuel leak at the body-to-bowl join, and all four bowl securing screws were loose. The bowl was loose and could be moved by hand, and disassembly revealed fretting and polishing on the bowl and body join surfaces. The accelerator pump plunger assembly shaft appeared loose, and both its packing and washer had detached from the carburetor body and were floating freely on the shaft. Further disassembly revealed that the carburetor was equipped with a brass-type float and the float level (distance between the top of the float and the body-to-bowl join) was 3/32 inch rather than the required 7/32 inch. The float was intact and did not leak when tested in a bowl of fuel. During disassembly Teflon-tape pipe sealing material was present on the threads of the carburetor inlet fuel fitting. Maintenance records indicated that the engine was last overhauled in January 2000, about 1,587.8 flight hours prior to the accident. The records did not indicate that the carburetor had been overhauled at that time, and there were no entries indicating any work had been performed on the carburetor over the next 19 years until the accident. The last documented maintenance event performed on the engine was for an annual inspection and occurred on November 13, 2018, 37.8 flight hours prior to the accident. The 4SPA carburetor was the subject of a series of service bulletins (SBs): MSA-3, issued by Precision Airmotive Corporation in 1991, established a 10-year overhaul period for the carburetor. SB-17 issued by Marvel-Schebler Aircraft Carburetors, LLC., dated August 12, 2010, with a subject of, "Body to Bowl Fuel Leaks", directed an inspection of the carburetor every 100 hours of engine operation. The SB described reports of loose body-to-bowl joints, with resulting leakage past the body-to-bowl gasket. Compliance required a visual inspection of the carburetor for evidence of movement, with remedial repairs should such evidence be found. Lycoming mandatory SB 366C, dated June 2, 2016, also directed a similar inspection of the carburetor every 50 hours of engine operation. The pilot stated that he had about 1 hour of flight experience in the accident airplane and that when operating other Cessna 172s, the engine speed would usually drop during the carburetor heat check by between 100 and 200 rpm. He stated that the rpm drop for the accident airplane was about 400 rpm. The pilot provided documentation from the airplane's owner who stated that he was aware that pilots had experienced a similar rpm drop but that the airplane had been examined and no anomalies were discovered. The owner's recommendation was to lean the fuel/air mixture when necessary. The before takeoff checklist in the Cessna 172L Owner's Manual includes a carburetor heat check. It does not specify an appropriate rpm drop but instead simply requires that the pilot, "check operation". During the climb after takeoff the engine lost partial power. The pilot performed troubleshooting steps and initiated a return to the airport. The airplane was not able to maintain altitude and landed in trees about 300 ft short of the approach end of the runway. Postaccident examination revealed sooting signatures on the spark plug electrodes and inner surfaces of the exhaust pipe, indicating an excessively rich fuel-to-air mixture. Examination of the carburetor revealed multiple maintenance-related discrepancies, including an incorrectly adjusted float and a loose carburetor bowl. The discrepancies likely resulted in mixture irregularities and a loss of engine power. Maintenance instructions and a series of service bulletins had been published by the carburetor manufacturer to address these issues. The discrepancies appeared to have been present for a while and were likely present at the time of the last annual inspection. The carburetor had not been overhauled or serviced in at least 19 years even though the manufacturer recommended overhaul at 10-year intervals. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine fuel and control-Fuel control/carburetor-Not serviced/maintained
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2019_WPR19LA102.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (engine failure, maintenance). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2023 · Reprint (Version printed in journal) Finite Element Simulation of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests for Cessna 172 Aircraft
The NASA Emergency Locator Transmitter Survivability and Reliability project was initiated in 2013 to assess the crash performance standards for the next generation of emergency locator transmitter (E…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- Semantic Scholar 2020 · Article (Collegiate Aviation Review International) From Classroom to Industry: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Decision-Making
The presence of human factors in aviation remains a critical area of research given the safety implications of human error.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation