NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR19LA176
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Partial loss of engine power during takeoff due to an age-degraded carburetor heat valve seal, which detached and partially blocked the carburetor air inlet. Contributing to the accident was an inadequate maintenance inspection.
Factual narrative
On June 20, 2019, at 1716 Pacific daylight time a Cessna 172M, N64460, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Fullerton Municipal Airport (FUL), Fullerton, California. The flight instructor and pilot receiving instruction were not injured. The airplane was operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a local instructional flight. The flight instructor reported that he planned to perform a flight review of the pilot receiving instruction and remain within the traffic pattern. He confirmed that both fuel tanks were full prior to departure and that the engine contained over 5 quarts of oil. The preflight checks and the engine runup did not reveal any anomalies. After completing one circuit in the traffic pattern, they performed a practice go-around. During the initial takeoff climb of the maneuver, the engine began to lose partial power. The flight instructor took the airplane's controls and applied carburetor heat. The engine responded for a few seconds, and then power was lost again. With minimal climb performance available, and limited time to perform trouble shooting steps, the instructor decided to land the airplane on a road adjacent to the airport. The airplane sustained damage to the right wing and forward fuselage during the off-airport landing. The airplane was equipped with an airbox assembly mounted to the carburetor venturi inlet on the underside of the engine. Inlet air passed through a filter on the front of the airbox and was directed up into the carburetor venturi by a butterfly valve. The system was designed such that when the pilot pulled the carburetor heat control (ON), the butterfly valve rotated about 90°, and redirected heated air from an exhaust shroud into the carburetor venturi through the back of the airbox. The butterfly valve was composed of two metal plates that sandwiched a flexible fiber-reinforced rubberized seal. Examination of the airbox assembly revealed that the aft section of the carburetor heat butterfly valve seal had broken away from the valve, and partially obstructed the air inlet of the carburetor venturi (See figures 1 and 2). The section was about 4 1/2 inches long and 3/8-inch-wide. It was brittle and exhibited four holes that matched the location of rivets on the lower side of the airbox (See figure 3). Black sooting was also observed on the inner surfaces of the exhaust pipe and the electrodes of all spark plugs (See figure 4). Figure 1 – Carburetor Heat Valve Seal Fragment Obstructing Carburetor Inlet Venturi Figure 2 – Carburetor Heat Valve in the ON Position (Area of Missing Seal Highlighted) Figure 3 – Carburetor Heat Valve Seal Fragment Figure 4 – Top Spark Plugs According to maintenance logbooks, the last inspection was an annual inspection completed 73.5 flight hours before the accident on May 16, 2019, at a total airframe time of 3,052.5 hours. The Cessna 172 service manual recommended that the induction airbox, air valves, doors and controls be inspected at 100-hour intervals. The mechanic who performed the last inspection stated that he confirmed the operation and condition of the butterfly valve by observing it through both the airbox assembly forward inlet and the heated air inlet on the rear right side of the unit. He stated that the aft section of the seal is hard to view due to the way it folds behind the butterfly valve and that the only way to clearly see it is through the heated air inlet, which was small. The only documented maintenance performed on the airbox assembly since the airplane’s manufacture in 1974 was the replacement of the airbox induction filter shroud on June 13, 2017. Review of the Federal Aviation Administration's Service Difficulty Report (SDR) database revealed three similar occurrences involving carburetor-equipped Cessna airplanes. Two occurred in 1977/78 N model 172's and one in a 1974 M model. The total time in service of the affected components was 3,706, 4,925, and 7,993 hours respectively. Shortly after takeoff during a practice go-around, the engine lost partial power. With limited time to troubleshoot, the flight instructor maneuvered the airplane for an off-airport landing, and the airplane sustained substantial damage after impacting a street. Postaccident examination revealed that the aft section of the carburetor heat butterfly valve seal had detached and partially blocked the air inlet of the carburetor venturi. The obstruction reduced the amount of air available for combustion, resulting in a rich fuel-to-air mixture, and partial loss of power. The valve seal was composed of a fiber-reinforced rubberized material that degraded and became brittle over the 45-year life of the airplane. The mechanic who performed the last inspection stated that he confirmed the operation and condition of the butterfly valve by observing it through both the airbox assembly forward inlet and the heated air inlet on the rear right side of the unit. He stated that the aft section of the seal is hard to view due to the way it folds behind the butterfly valve and that the only way to clearly see it is through the heated air inlet, which was small. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Power plant-Air intake-Damaged/degraded
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Power plant-Air intake-Fatigue/wear/corrosion
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Scheduled/routine maintenance-Maintenance personnel
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2019_WPR19LA176.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM)
Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗