WPR21LA017
2020-10-17 · Puyallup, Washington, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PLU
Current FAA registration · N4673R
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-28-140
- Year of manufacture
- 1966 · 54 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19660211
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A5B66D
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A partial loss of engine power as a result of carburetor icing and the flight instructors failure to use carburetor heat.
Factual narrative
On October 17, 2020, about 1742 Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-28-140 airplane, N4673R, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Pierce County Airport – Thun Field (PLU), Puyallup, Washington. The flight instructor, one student, and one passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. The student pilot reported that they conducted an uneventful preflight, runup, and takeoff. They proceeded to PLU to conduct a few touch-and-go landings. The first was an uneventful soft field landing and takeoff. Since the traffic pattern was busy, they flew a wide pattern and had a slightly faster than normal approach to land. After the second touch-and-go they were climbing with full power through about 500 ft when the engine sputtered momentarily. The instructor took over the flight controls and continued on a left crosswind when the engine power reduced to idle. The instructor turned the airplane back toward the airport and ensured the fuel selector was on, throttle and mixture were full forward, and both magnetos on. The student pilot pressed the starter to see if that would help, but the engine continued to idle and the airplane continued to descend. Unable to reach the airport, the instructor performed an off-airport landing. The airplane touched down momentarily and bounced back into ground effect. It impacted a few trees before coming to a stop in a parking lot. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the right wing and fuselage. A postaccident examination of the engine did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The engine was rotated by hand; continuity was established throughout the drivetrain, and thumb compression was established. The carburetor bowl was removed, and fuel was located within the bowl. When the throttle was moved, fuel expelled from the accelerator pump. A small fuel tank was connected to the right-wing fuel line and the engine was prepared for an engine run. The engine started normally and exhibited a little roughness but smoothed out within a few seconds. The fuel and oil pressure gauges indicated normal pressure. The throttle was manipulated, and the engine responded accordingly with no anomalies noted. The temperature and dewpoint were plotted on the FAA Carburetor Icing Chart. Conditions fell on the line between serious icing at cruise power and serious icing at glide power. The flight instructor reported to the FAA inspector that he did not use carburetor heat once the engine started to sputter. The student pilot reported that they conducted two uneventful touch-and-go landings. After the second touch-and-go, they were climbing with full power through about 500 ft when the engine sputtered momentarily. The instructor took over the flight controls and continued a left crosswind when the engine power reduced to idle. The instructor turned the airplane back toward the airport and ensured the fuel selector was on, throttle and mixture were full forward, and magnetos on both. The student pilot pressed the starter to see if that would help, but the engine continued at idle, and the airplane continued to descend. Unable to make it to the airport, the instructor made an off-airport landing during which the airplane touched down momentarily and bounced back into ground effect. It impacted a few trees before coming to a stop in a parking lot. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the right wing and fuselage. A postaccident examination and run of the engine did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The temperature and dewpoint conditions were plotted and fell on the line between serious icing at cruise power and serious icing at glide power. The instructor reported that he did not use carburetor heat once the engine started to sputter. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Temp/humidity/pressure-Conducive to carburetor icing-Effect on operation
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Use of equip/system-Instructor/check pilot
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Ice/rain protection system-Intake anti-ice, deice-Not used/operated
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2020_WPR21LA017.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…