WPR21LA078
2021-01-02 · Moab, Utah, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport CNY
Current FAA registration · N833RT
- Make / Model
- CESSNA P210N
- Year of manufacture
- 1982 · 39 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR TSIO-520 SER (300 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19820427
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AB6508
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s improper application of full throttle during takeoff, which resulted in loss of engine power due to an excessive fuel flow and overly rich fuel mixture.
Factual narrative
On January 2, 2021, about 1430 mountain standard time, a Cessna P210N airplane, N833RT, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Moab, Utah. The pilot and three passengers were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. According to the pilot, the airplane was brought into a hangar for a few hours to melt ice that had accumulated on the airframe. When the engine would not start after several attempts, the airplane was brought back into the hangar for a few more hours to warm the engine. After the initial engine startup, the oil pressure and oil temperature indications were confirmed, and the pilot taxied the airplane to the runup area. The engine runup revealed no anomalies. Shortly after takeoff, about 100 to 200 ft above ground level (agl), the engine began to run rough and lost partial power. The pilot retracted the landing gear but soon felt additional loss of engine power followed by a loss of altitude and maneuverability. The pilot extended the landing gear and performed a forced landing onto the remaining runway. The airplane landed on the left side of the runway before veering right and exiting into the snow-covered runway safety area. The right main landing gear collapsed, and the airplane came to rest on the right-wing tip and right horizontal stabilizer. The pilot reported that the landing gear was possibly not in the fully extended position upon landing. The front passenger reported to the pilot that the fuel flow gauge indicated about 42 gallons of fuel per hour (gph) during the takeoff. At 1453, the recorded weather at Canyonlands Field Airport (CNY), Moab, Utah, included wind from 330° at 8 knots, and a temperature of -6 C°. The airplane was installed with a Continental IO-550 engine that was converted from a normally aspirated engine to a turbo-normalized engine on November 9th, 2020. This was also the date of the last annual inspection with an engine total time of 0.0 hours. The engine had about 40 hours of operation at the time of the accident. Vitatoe Aviation owns the Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA02918CH that was installed. Recovered engine data revealed a loss of rpm, manifold pressure, and fuel pressure during the takeoff. These values were restored shortly before dropping again. Manifold pressure and fuel flow values reached a maximum of 33.7 inHg and 47.9 gph, respectively. During a postaccident test run, the engine hesitated; however, manifold pressure indicated 34.2 in Hg and the fuel flow was 44 gph, at 2,720 rpm. After the engine was at normal operating temperature, the manifold pressure and fuel flow displayed nominal values when the engine was operated at 2,700 rpm. Following the engine test run, a test flight was performed with no anomalies noted through multiple power settings. No component adjustments were made to the engine during the test run. The Vitatoe Pilot Operating Handbook (POH) Supplement Rev. B issued on July 24, 2014, stated: On the first flight of the day, when the throttle is advanced for takeoff, manifold pressure will normally exceed 31.0 inches Hg and fuel flows will exceed 37 GPH if the throttle is opened fully. Momentary manifold pressures up to 33.0 inches Hg are acceptable. If manifold pressure consistently exceeds 31.0 inches of Hg, mechanical adjustment may be necessary. On any takeoff, the manifold pressure should be monitored, and the throttle set to provide 31.0 inches Hg; then, for maximum engine power, a full rich mixture should provide at least 35 GPH (36-37 GPH preferred). The pilot was departing on the first flight of the day in cold weather conditions after the airplane had spent several hours inside a hangar to melt ice from the airframe and warm the engine. About 100-200 ft above ground level (agl) shortly after takeoff, the engine began to run rough and lost partial power. He retracted the landing gear, and the engine subsequently lost additional power. The pilot decided to land on the remaining runway and extended the landing gear. The airplane landed on the left side of the runway before veering right and exiting into the snow-covered runway safety area. The right main landing gear collapsed, and the airplane came to rest on the right wingtip and right horizontal stabilizer. The front passenger reported to the pilot that the fuel flow gauge read about 42 gallons of fuel per hour (gph) during the takeoff. Recovered engine data indicated that fuel flow values exceeded 47 gph before the second loss of engine power. During an engine test run, the engine hesitated when the throttle was advanced, and the manifold pressure indicated 34.2 inHg, fuel flow 44 gph, at 2,720 rpm. After the engine reached a normal operating temperature, the engine ran normally. No component adjustments were made to the engine during the test run. According to the engine operating handbook, during the first flight of the day, the manifold pressure will normally exceed 31 inHg and fuel flows will exceed 37 gph if the throttle is opened fully. The handbook advised that manifold pressure be monitored and that the throttle be set to provide 31 inches of manifold pressure. It is likely that, during takeoff, the pilot fully advanced the throttle, which resulted in a high manifold pressure and high fuel flow, an excessively rich fuel/air mixture, and a subsequent loss of engine power. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action selection-Pilot
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine fuel and control-Fuel controlling system-Capability exceeded
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2021_WPR21LA078.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…