WPR22LA159
2022-04-19 · Long Beach, California, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LGB
Current FAA registration · N822SA
- Make / Model
- DIAMOND AIRCRAFT DA 42
- Year of manufacture
- 2006 · 16 years old at event
- Engine
- AUSTRO E4 SERIES (168 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 20110608
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AB39DA
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the right main landing gear brace rib for reasons that could not be determined based on available information.
Factual narrative
On April 19, 2022, about 1538 Pacific daylight time, a Diamond Aircraft Inc. DA-42 airplane, N822SA, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident at Long Beach Airport (Daugherty Field), Long Beach, California. The flight instructor and the pilot receiving instruction were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. The pilot receiving instruction reported that he was conducting a multiengine training flight and had performed multiple maneuvers before the accident. During the rollout after a short-field landing, about 750 ft from the touchdown point, the right main landing gear collapsed, and the right wing contacted the ground, which substantially damaged the right aileron. According to the flight instructor, the approach was normal, and the touchdown occurred with no sideloading. The flight instructor also stated that he checked the gear three times; the pilot receiving instruction checked it twice; and the gear appeared to be in the down and locked position, as indicated by the three green landing gear lights. A representative from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), along with maintenance personnel from the operator, examined the airplane at the accident site and observed the composite right landing gear brace rib had separated from the wing structure. Further examination of the airframe revealed the right main landing gear brace rib had separated from its attachment points at the spar and upper wing skin. The bonding paste material was still adhered to both the brace rib and the spar/wing skin attachment points, consistent with correct adhesion of the components. There was no evidence of faulty adhesion from the original installation. The examination also revealed an 8- to 10-inch crack between the upper and lower wing skin bonds to the airplane’s center section spar. A coin tap test and a visual examination revealed no cracks on the left main landing gear brace. A review of maintenance documents revealed that the latest service bulletins and airworthiness directives had been performed on the airplane. Also, the airplane had recently completed a 100-hour/annual inspection about 3 weeks before the accident, with no report of damaged or faulty components related to the landing gear. The airplane had been flown for about 35 hours since the annual inspection by multiple pilots. The pilot receiving instruction performed a short-field landing to a runway. During the rollout, about 750 ft from the touchdown point, the right main landing gear collapsed, and the right wing contacted the runway, which resulted in substantial damage to the right aileron. A postaccident inspection revealed the right main landing gear brace rib had separated from the wing structure. Examination of the failed components revealed the separation did not occur due to faulty adhesion from the original installation. In addition, an 8- to 10-inch crack was discovered between the upper and lower wing skin bonds to the airplane’s center section spar. That crack would have resulted from some type of force or stress to the airplane, such as a hard landing. However, no hard landings in the airplane had been reported. The airplane had undergone a 100-hour/annual inspection about 3 weeks before the accident, with no reports of damage or faults related to the landing gear. The airplane had been flown for about 35 hours since the inspection by multiple pilots. It is likely that the separation of the right main landing gear support assembly and the crack were initiated by a hard landing that was not reported since the inspection. The condition of the right main landing gear brace rib likely began to deteriorate and the right main landing gear subsequently collapsed during the accident flight. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main gear strut/axle/truck-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_WPR22LA159.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.