WPR22LA322
2022-08-26 · Caldwell, Idaho, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport EUL
Current FAA registration · N52367
- Make / Model
- SKYSTAR ACFT CO KITFOX VIXEN
- Engine
- SUBARU EA-81 (100 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20141021
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A6975D
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The partial loss of engine power due to a loose wire leading to the engine’s electronic control unit (ECU). Contributing was the pilot’s exceedance of the critical angle of attack while maneuvering, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall at an altitude too low for recovery.
Factual narrative
On August 26, 2022, about 1620 mountain daylight time, an experimental, amateur-built Kitfox V Vixen, N52367, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Caldwell, Idaho. The pilot received minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that he was conducting a post-maintenance test flight of the airplane after it had undergone a conditional inspection. The pilot reported that he had completed a flight down the runway in ground effect and then landed back on the runway. He then retook the runway for a flight around the traffic pattern. After climbing about 200 feet above the runway, the engine “slowly and continuously decreased power” to about 15 - 20% engine power. With no usable runway to land on, he turned to the left and attempted to land on a taxiway until he realized that a stall was imminent. He pushed the nose over and applied full right rudder and leveled the wings. The airplane impacted the ground and nosed over,sustaining substantial damage to the fuselage, left wing, wing struts, and the empennage as shown in figure 1. Figure 1. N52367, exhibiting substantial damage. Photo courtesy of the pilot. The airplane came to rest inverted in an open field on the airport. All major components remained attached to the airplane, except for the four propeller blades, which remained near the wreckage. Postaccident examination of the airframe revealed that the experimental Subaru EA-81 engine’s ECU would lose power when a wire bundle near the firewall was wiggled. The source of the intermittent power was traced to a loose wire crimped to a terminal. The wire was traced to the ignition switch 5-amp circuit breaker (figure 2). The mechanic who conducted the examination reported that the Subaru EA 81 engine had a “limp mode” feature which, when activated, resulted in a power reduction to about 25% to protect the engine and powertrain in automotive applications. An automotive mechanic, with multiple years of experience with Subaru engines, confirmed that an interruption of power to the ECU would activate the limp mode. Figure 2. Image of the electronic control module power supply wire and crimped terminal end. The wire was separated from the terminal postaccident. Photo courtesy of the Federal Aviation Administration. The pilot planned to take off and remain in the traffic pattern as part of a post-maintenance test flight of the airplane. After climbing to about 200 ft above the runway, the engine started to gradually lose power to about 15-20% engine power. The pilot had begun maneuvering the airplane for a forced landing when it entered an aerodynamic stall. The pilot attempted to recover from the stall; however, the airplane impacted terrain and nosed over, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage, left wing, wing struts, and empennage. Postaccident examination determined that the power supply wire for the experimental engine’s electronic control unit (ECU) was loose in the crimped terminal. It is likely that during the flight, the intermittent power source to the ECU activated the engine’s “limp mode,” which resulted in a reduction of engine power to a level that was insufficient to maintain altitude. The engine’s limp mode is a safety feature designed to protect the engine and powertrain in automotive applications. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Electrical power system-DC power distribution system-Malfunction
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-(general)-(general)-Design
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Altitude-Attain/maintain not possible
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Airspeed-Attain/maintain not possible
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_WPR22LA322.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.