NTSB CAROL · Event
Event WPR24LA082
Registry · N7473D
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
PIPER PA-18A 150
Year of manufacture
1957 · 67 years old at event
Engine
LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
Seats / Engines
1 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20100720
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S AA0F50
Registrant of record
REZZONICO JOHN
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
An impact with terrain for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On January 26, 2024, about 1329 Pacific standard time, a Piper PA-18A-150, N7473D, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Eden, Oregon. The pilot was seriously injured, and the passenger received minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. Both the pilot and passenger stated that they had a limited recollection of the accident flight. The pilot reported that they departed Joseph State Airport (JSY), Joseph, Oregon, at 0955 with 36 gallons of fuel on board, for a scenic flight. At an unknown point during the flight they landed on a private airstrip owned by the passenger. The passenger reported that they were returning from his property when they impacted the ground, about three hours into the flight. The pilot and passenger could not remember any further details. According to first responders, the fuel selector was in the OFF position at the accident site. A representative of the recovery team reported that he drained about 2-3 gallons from the right-wing fuel tank and about 7 gallons from the left-wing fuel tank. Postaccident examination of the airplane and engine revealed no preimpact mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Both propeller blades were straight and remained attached to the crankshaft at the propeller hub. One blade tip was bent towards the camber side of the blade and the other blade tip was bent towards the blade face. The engine ran smooth and continuously during an engine test run and the fuel system (from the fuel lines at the wing roots to the engine) functioned normally when fuel was plumbed into the lines. A small oil leak was observed at the No. 3 cylinder exhaust tube and the engine was subsequently shut down for safety reasons. The fuel tanks were not compromised. The airplane impacted mountainous terrain at a field elevation of about 2,900 ft mean sea level (msl) and was about 30 nm from the nearest airport with an onsite weather reporting station. A High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model sounding was created for the accident time and location. As the pilot and passenger were unable to recall their altitude before the airplane crashed, the model sounding was created from various altitudes. At an elevation of 3,900 ft msl, the HRRR sounding indicated the temperature was about 38° F and the dewpoint was about 29° F (“1” in Figure 1); the wind was from 207° at 3 kts. At an elevation of 4,900 ft msl, the HRRR sounding indicated the temperature was about 32° F and the dewpoint was about 23° F (“2” in Figure 1); the wind was from 204° at 9 kts. At an elevation of 5,900 ft msl, the HRRR sounding indicated the temperature was about 31° F and the dewpoint was about 20° F (“3” in Figure 1); the wind was from 201° at 11.5 kts. According to the model sounding, the airplane was operating in conditions conducive to serious icing at cruise power at 3,900 ft msl (1,000 ft above ground level). At higher altitudes, the conditions were conducive to icing at both glide and cruise power. Figure 1: Carburetor icing probability chart from Federal Aviation Administration Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin CE-09-35 According to the airplane manufacturer, a manual was not developed for this airplane as it was not required when it was certificated under Civil Aviation Regulations 3. In addition, no fuel consumption information was found in the airplane’s type certificate. Fuel computations were derived from the Lycoming engine manual, which listed fuel consumption of 16.1 gph at 2,700 rpm and 200 hp, 12.3 gph at 75% power and 150 hp, and 9.5 gph at 65% power and 130 hp. The fuel consumption for the accident flight was computed based on the fuel quantity determined by recovery personnel at the accident site and the total time in flight (216 minutes). The total calculated rate of consumption from the accident flight was about 8 gph. The airplane crashed about 40 nm miles north of its departure airport. The estimated time en route from the accident site to the pilot’s departure airport was calculated using a normal cruise airspeed of about 85 kts, and the rate of fuel consumption during the accident flight. If the pilot had elected to proceed home from the accident site, the engine would have consumed about 3-4 gallons of fuel. The pilot and passenger departed on a scenic flight in northern Oregon. At an undetermined point in the 3-hr-and-36-minute flight they landed at the passenger’s airstrip. It is unknown how much time they spent on the ground, as the occupants could not recall any details from the accident flight. The passenger reported that they were returning from his property when they impacted the ground. The airplane crashed in mountainous terrain about 40 nautical miles (nm) north of the departure airport. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no preimpact mechanical anomalies that could have precluded normal operation. The propeller signatures indicated that the engine was under low power or may have been windmilling at the time of impact. It is unknown if the propeller signatures were due to a loss of power or if the pilot manipulated the throttle control before impact. About 2 gallons of fuel were drained from the right fuel tank and about 7 gallons were drained from the left tank after the accident. It is unknown which tank was selected at the time of the accident, as the fuel selector was in the OFF position at the accident site. The fuel tanks were not breached nor did the fuel system show any evidence of an obstruction. Further evidence suggests that the airplane was also operating in conditions conducive to potentially serious carburetor ice at cruise power; however, it is unknown if the pilot used carburetor heat during the flight. The investigation was unable to determine why the airplane impacted the terrain. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2024_WPR24LA082.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…
- NASA NTRS 2024 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – Oct 2024
This presentation provides a status update on select NASA icing research activities for the SAE AC-9C Icing Technical Committee Meeting on Oct 21, 2024.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗