NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ANC13TA076
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the tail rotor crosshead bearing, which resulted in a loss of tail rotor control.
Factual narrative
On August 8, 2013, about 1430 Alaska daylight time, a restricted category Bell UH-1B helicopter, N70NW, sustained substantial damage during a forced landing, after a loss of tail rotor effectiveness at the Tok Junction Airport, Tok Alaska. The helicopter was being operated by Northern Pioneer Helicopters, Big Lake, Alaska, as a 14 CFR Part 133 external load, aerial firefighting flight when the accident occurred. The certificated commercial pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and the U.S. Forestry Service's flight following procedures were in effect. The local flight departed Tok Junction Airport, about 1400. During a telephone conversation with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge (IIC) on August 9, the pilot reported that the helicopter was dispatched to Tok Junction in support of firefighting operations for the U.S. Forestry Service. The pilot said that during the accident flight, he had just completed a water drop using a water bucket and a 100-foot long-line attached to the helicopter's belly-mounted cargo hook. Immediately after releasing the load of water at a predetermined site, he noticed a degradation of directional control. He said that he was able to maintain control of the helicopter, and he subsequently returned to the Tok Junction Airport with the 100-foot long-line and water bucket still attached to the helicopter. As the helicopter approached the airport, the pilot jettisoned the 100 foot long-line and water bucket before attempting an emergency, stuck pedal run-on landing. During the emergency landing approach, the helicopter began to drift to the left, towards a stand of trees. Unable to maintain directional control, he initiated a go-around, and the main rotor blades struck the tops of the trees. After realigning the helicopter with the runway, he performed a "slow-speed" run-on landing to a gravel area adjacent to the runway. During touchdown, the helicopter bounced multiple times and came to rest upright. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to fuselage, vertical fin and tail rotor blades. The helicopter was equipped with after-market tail rotor blades. An on-scene examination of the tail rotor assembly by the operator revealed that the pitch change rod, and the crosshead bearing retention nut were protruding outboard through the tail rotor crosshead. The entire tail rotor gearbox assembly was removed from the accident helicopter for further examination. On January 14 and 15, 2014, under the supervision of the NTSB IIC, the tail rotor pitch change assembly was examined at Bell Helicopter's field investigation laboratory, Hurst, Texas. The examination revealed that the tail rotor crosshead bearing's inboard shoulder of the split inner ring was spalled, and completely worn away, allowing the bearings outboard set of bearing balls to run over the pitch change rod's seating flange for the split inner ring inboard shoulder. The pitch change rod was then free to migrate outboard machining a hole through the end of the crosshead. As a result of the pitch change rod moving outboard, a decrease in the amount of maximum tail rotor blade pitch change occurred. The pilot had just completed a water drop with a long-line and water bucket when he noticed a degradation of the helicopter's directional control. He returned to the airport, released the bucket, and attempted a "stuck-pedal" run-on landing. During the attempted landing, the helicopter began to drift left toward trees. Unable to maintain directional control, the pilot initiated a go-around, and the main rotor blades then struck the treetops. After realigning with the runway, he executed a "slow-speed" run-on landing to a gravel area adjacent to the runway. During touchdown, the helicopter bounced multiple times, and it then came to rest upright. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, vertical fin, and tail rotor blades. A postaccident examination of the tail rotor assembly revealed that the tail rotor crosshead bearing's split inner ring's inboard shoulder was spalled and completely worn away, which allowed the outboard set of bearing balls to run over the pitch change rod's seating flange for the split inner ring's inboard shoulder. The pitch change rod was then free to migrate outboard, and it machined a hole through the end of the crosshead. The movement of the pitch change rod decreased the effectiveness of the left antitorque pedal and increased the effectiveness of the right antitorque pedal. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft propeller/rotor-Tail rotor drive system-Tail rotor gearbox-Failure - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2013_ANC13TA076.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗