ANC93LA102
1993-06-23 · NONDALTON, Alaska, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 5NN
N23224 has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (AMERICAN LEGEND AIRCRAFT CO AL3, built 2006), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
THE INADEQUATE PREFLIGHT PREPARATION BY THE PILOT-IN-COMMAND. A FACTOR IN THE ACCIDENT WAS THE ENCOUNTER WITH UNSUITABLE TERRAIN DURING THE EMERGENCY DESCENT.
Factual narrative
On June 23, 1993, at approximately 1750 Alaska daylight time, a wheel equipped Cessna 150 airplane, N23224, crashed after engine power loss at Nondalton Airport, Alaska. The student pilot had departed King Salmon, Alaska, at 1523 on a VFR flight plan on a solo cross country instructional flight under 14 CFR Part 91 in visual meteorological conditions. The student pilot was not injured and the airplane sustained substantial damage. The instructor pilot told investigators that he had advised the student to "fuel up the airplane" before departing King Salmon, but that later the student told him that the "fuel gauges showed above 3/4 full, so he didn't fuel before leaving." The instructor also told investigators that the airplane had flown 1.1 hours prior to the accident flight without refueling. The instructor told investigators that he believed the airplane "would have had less than 3 hours of gas" when it departed King Salmon. The airplane flew approximately 2 hours and 27 minutes, a flight which included a touch and go executed at an intermediate airport. The route of flight from King Salmon to Dillingham and to Nondalton was under the influence of low level easterly winds of 15 to 25 knots on the day of the accident flight. The student pilot described the power loss to be "the engine just died" while climbing after a low pass to examine the landing surface at Nondalton. An emergency descent to the tundra near the airport ended in a nose over crash. Due to the remote location of the accident site from the NTSB Anchorage office and the lack of readily available FAA resources, investigators were unable to determine the amount of fuel in the airplane's fuel system. Upon discussion with FAA representatives in Anchorage, the airplane was released to the owner/operator. THE STUDENT PILOT ATTEMPTED CROSS COUNTRY FLIGHT WITHOUT FILLING ACFT FUEL TANKS, AS DIRECTED BY FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR. THE INSTRUCTOR TOLD THE NTSB HE BELIEVED THE AIRCRAFT HAD LESS THAN 3 HOURS FUEL ON DEPARTURE. THE STUDENT PILOT FLEW 2.5 HOURS INCLUDING INTERMEDIATE PATTERN WORK WHEN THE ENGINE EXPERIENCED A COMPLETE POWER LOSS DURING GO-AROUND AT DESTINATION. THE FORCED LANDING RESULTED IN A NOSE OVER IN TUNDRA WITHIN THE AIRPORT BOUNDARY. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1993_ANC93LA102.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…