ATL03LA113
2003-06-30 · Gadsden, Alabama, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KGAD
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of engine power during takeoff due to foreign object damage, which resulted in an in-flight collision with terrain during forced landing. Factors were the pilot's inadequate preflight inspection of the airplane, his failure to secure the cargo/baggage door, and his failure to maintain control of the airplane prior to ejecting from the airplane.
Factual narrative
On June 30, 2003, at 1533 central daylight time, an Aero Vodochody L39C experimental jet airplane, N8125R, registered to Jet Team LLC and operated by the commercial pilot, lost engine power, and collided with the ground during takeoff from Gadsden Municipal Airport, Gadsden, Alabama. The personal flight was operated under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91 with an instrument flight plan filed. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed. The pilot ejected from the airplane and received fatal injuries, and the airplane was destroyed by post-impact fire. The flight was originating from Gadsden, Alabama, at the time of the accident on June 30, 2003. The flight was departing runway 6 en route to Muskegon, Michigan, where the airplane is based. A witness at the airport reported the airplane had arrived the previous day and the pilot and airplane participated in media interviews the day of the accident. The airplane received no maintenance at the airport facilities. Witnesses reported heavy rain and thunderstorms arriving in the area near the time of departure, and a brief period of heavy rain occurred during the startup and taxi of the jet. A witness in a parking lot adjacent to the runway watched the airplane's takeoff roll and stated he saw what looked like birds or debris in the air around the airplane as soon as it lifted off the runway. He then heard a "thump, thump" noise, followed by engine whining. The witness reported the airplane continued airborne, appeared to struggle back and forth, then it veered left and descended. The witness estimated the airplane was at an approximate 90-degree angle and no more than 50 feet above the ground when the pilot ejected. The airplane then collided with the ground and caught fire, and the witness and others rushed to the site to help. Examination of the accident site found the fire-damaged airplane in a grassy area north of runway 6, approximately 300 to 400 yards from the east end of the runway. Portions of the fuselage and wings were consumed by fire. The ejection seat was found approximately 200 to 300 feet north of the airplane. The seat parachute was deployed and the parachute canopy was not open. Examination of the runway revealed a fabric briefcase, numerous papers, and other objects that had been stowed in the nose compartment of the airplane were found on the runway near the point where the airplane rotated. The upper portion of the nose compartment and the left and right access panels for the nose compartment were found separated on the ground. The left access panel for the nose compartment was found separated from the airframe with the upper hinges absent. The left panel displayed fire damage and extensive crush deformation with the fasteners on the panel lower edge attached. The right access panel for the nose compartment was found attached at the upper hinges to the upper nose compartment structure. The right panel and nose compartment structure displayed no fire damage and exhibited minor bending deformation and scratches in the paint. The fasteners on the right panel lower edge were absent. The Gadsden Municipal Airport automated weather observation system reported at 1535 winds were from 210 degrees at 10 knots, visibility 5 statute miles with thunderstorms, ceilings broken at 100 feet above ground level, broken at 900 feet above ground level, and overcast at 2,700 feet above ground level. The report contained remarks as follows: lightning distant in the east, thunderstorms began at 1527. According to a chart published by Czech Jet, for single-seat ejection from the aircraft, the lowest minimum altitude for ejection with 90 degrees of bank is approximately 1,100 feet above the ground, and the lowest minimum altitude for ejection with zero degrees of bank is less than zero feet above the ground. Forensic toxicology was performed on specimens from the pilot by the Federal Aviation Administration Bioaeronautical Sciences Research Laboratory, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The report stated no carbon monoxide, no cyanide, and no ethanol were detected in the blood. The report stated 0.259 (ug/mL, ug/g) fluoxetine was detected in the blood, fluoxetine was present in the urine, 0.397 (ug/mL, ug/g) norfluoxetine was detected in the blood, and norfluoxetine was present in the urine. The flight was departing with heavy rain and thunderstorms in the vicinity. During takeoff roll, a witness observed debris in the air around the airplane as soon as it lifted off the runway, then heard two "thump" noises from the engine followed by engine whining. The airplane continued airborne, then veered left and descended. The airplane rolled approximately 90 degrees, and the pilot ejected. Objects that had been stowed in the nose compartment of the airplane were found on the runway near the point where the airplane rotated. The left access panel for the nose compartment was found separated from the airframe with the upper hinges absent. The left panel displayed fire damage and extensive crush deformation with the fasteners on the panel lower edge attached. The right access panel for the nose compartment was found attached at the upper hinges to the upper nose compartment structure. The right panel and nose compartment structure displayed no fire damage and exhibited minor bending deformation and scratches in the paint. The fasteners on the right panel lower edge were absent. According to a chart published by Czech Jet, for single-seat ejection from the aircraft, the lowest minimum altitude for ejection with 90 degrees of bank is approximately 1,100 feet above the ground, and the lowest minimum altitude for ejection with zero degrees of bank is less than zero feet above the ground. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_ATL03LA113.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance, thunderstorm). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…