ATL04LA020
2003-10-18 · Beaufort, North Carolina, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KMRH
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's misjudgment of speed and distance, and his failure to perform a go-around which resulted in an overrun and on ground collision with terrain.
Factual narrative
On October 18, 2003, at 1705 eastern daylight time, a Beech A23-24, N2394W, registered to Hancock Aviation, Inc., and operated by the private pilot, went off the end of the runway and collided into a ditch during landing at Michael J. Smith Field, Beaufort, North Carolina. The personal flight was operated under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91 with an instrument flight plan filed. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. The private pilot and the passenger reported no injuries, and the airplane sustained substantial damage. The flight departed Raleigh County Memorial Airport, Beckley, West Virginia, about 1410 on October 18, 2003. The flight initially departed Findlay, Ohio, with a fuel stop in Beckley, West Virginia. The pilot stated that, as he approached the airport in Beaufort, North Carolina, he had difficulty recognizing the runways. When he realized runway 14 was in front of him, he elected to land on it. The pilot stated the airplane bounced three times during landing, and he did not initiate a go-around, because he did not think the airplane would clear the trees at the end of the runway. The pilot stated there was not enough runway remaining to stop the airplane. A witness at the airport reported the airplane was moving "fast" and had not touched down prior to the halfway point of the 4,000-foot runway. A second witness stated the airplane was "really moving" and was about 60 feet above runway 14 when it passed the intersection with runway 3, and he estimated the airplane had one hundred yards of runway remaining when the pilot "forced it down." Both witnesses reported the airplane porpoised, then went off the end of the runway into the ditch of a settlement pond. Examination of the airplane revealed the right side of the nose section sustained crush damage, the propeller was bent, the nose gear was displaced, and the right wing sustained crush damage and was displaced aft at the wing root. The pilot reported no mechanical malfunction with the airplane. The pilot stated that, as he approached the airport, he had difficulty recognizing the runways. When he realized runway 14 was in front of him, he elected to land on it. The airplane bounced three times and went off the end of the runway into a ditch. A witness stated the airplane came in fast and was about 60 feet above runway 14 when it crossed the intersection with runway 3. The witness estimated the airplane had one hundred yards of runway remaining when the pilot "forced it down." The pilot reported no mechanical malfunction with the airplane. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_ATL04LA020.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…