NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ATL98LA095
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the pilot to obtain flying speed, and the delayed decision to abort the take-off, leading to a loss of control in flight, and the subsequent collision with a ditch.
Factual narrative
On July 9, 1998, about 1651 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 150M, N9363U, nosed over on landing at Vero Beach Municipal Airport, Vero Beach, Florida. The personal flight was operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91 and visual flight rules. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. No flight plan was filed. The airplane was substantially damaged, and both private pilots were not injured. The flight originated from Vero Beach at 1604. According to the pilot, he and his brother were practicing touch and go landings at Vero Beach. On the second touch and go, he added full power, turned carburetor heat off, and retracted the flaps. The airplane rotated and climbed to approximately 10-20 feet before it started to sink back to the runway. The airplane hit the runway and bounced back into the air. The pilot's brother, also a private pilot, then took the controls and attempted to regain control of the airplane on the runway. The airplane bounced a few more times, broke off the nose landing gear, and impacted the ground, nosing over. After the airplane came to rest, both pilots exited the airplane unhurt. The pilot also stated that upon exiting the airplane he noted that the wind had changed to a 10-15 knot tailwind. The second pilot stated that at takeoff the winds were 260 degrees at 6 knots (ATIS reported the winds as 280 degrees at 6 knots). His brother made the first touch and go on runway 29R with no problems. During the second touch and go, he rotated and the airplane began to sink. The second pilot stated he looked at the airspeed indicator and noted it was 45-50 knots. Normal climb is made at 65-70 knots. The airplane bounced several times, during which the second pilot took the controls. After touching down at the end of the runway, the second pilot noted a ditch in front of them, a drainage ditch for runway 22, and attempted to fly over it. The airplane struck the ditch, and the nose gear snapped off, and the airplane bounced into the air. As the airplane slowed, the nose came down, and the airplane nosed over. The second pilot also stated that the wind was from 110 at approximately 10-17 knots when they exited the airplane. According to the pilots, the tower controller had not advised them of any changes in the weather. The pilots also stated that within five minutes after the accident, all traffic was landing on 11R. According to the certified re-recording of the tower tape, which covered the time period between 2032-2056 Zulu, operations continued on runways 29L and 29R. In the second pilots statement, he stated that he had ATIS information Quebec, and the winds were from 260 degrees at 6 knots. Information Quebec, provided by the tower tape, which was current at the time of the accident, is as follows: 1950 Zulu/wind 280 at 06/ visibility 15/ 4000 scattered/25,000 broken/ temp. 33/dew point 23 altimeter 30.01/ DME approach, runway 29/ runways 29L and 29R in use... According to a certified re-recording of the tower tape, the winds were broadcast over the radio by the controller roughly 3 minutes after the accident as 270 degrees at 4 knots. After the accident four airplanes continued using runway 29L and one airplane was in the pattern for 29R, executing a requested, practice missed approach. According to the Flight Training Handbook (AC61-21A), it is possible for an airplane, that is low to the ground, to fly at an airspeed slightly slower than is required to achieve level flight. This is due to the reduction of induced drag at a constant lift coefficient. This is "flying in ground effect" and occurs when the airplane is at or below a height equal to its wing span. The wing span on a Cessna 150 is 33.4 feet. According to the pilot's statement they were at a height of 20-30 feet above the ground when they started to sink back to the runway. The pilot also stated that their airspeed was below the normal airspeed required for climb-out. According to the advisory circular, when an airplane becomes airborne with a deficiency of speed, it will not be able to fly out of ground effect and will settle back to the runway. It is important that no attempt be made to force the airplane to become airborne with a deficiency of speed. According to the pilot, the recommended takeoff speed that is necessary to provide adequate initial climb performance is 65-70 knots. According to the Cessna 150 flight manual, the flaps up, power off stall speed for a Cessna 150 is 55 miles per hour (48 knots). According to the pilot, he and his brother were practicing touch and go landings at Vero Beach Airport. On the second touch and go, he added full power, turned carburetor heat off, and retracted the flaps. The airplane rotated and climbed to approximately 10-20 feet before it started to sink back to the runway. The airplane hit the runway and bounced back into the air three or four times. The pilot's brother, also a private pilot, then took the controls and attempted to regain control of the airplane on the runway. The airplane bounced one more time, broke off the nose landing gear, and impacted the ground, nosing over. After the airplane came to rest, both pilots exited the airplane unhurt. The pilot stated that they did not have sufficient airspeed for the airplane to climb. According to him the normal climb-out speed for a Cessna 150 is 65-70 knots, on takeoff the airspeed indicator was reading between 45 and 55 knots. According to the Cessna 150 flight manual, the flaps up, power off stall speed for a Cessna 150 is 55 miles per hour (48 knots). Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_ATL98LA095.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall, loss of control). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2022 · Accident report
Loss of Control on Takeoff in Icing Conditions — Citation 560XL
Cessna Citation 560XL fatal takeoff icing accident, March 2018. Investigation of a Citation 560XL loss-of-control takeoff accident in icing conditions.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Simulation Modeling Requirements for Loss-of-Control Accident Prevention of Turboprop Transport Aircraft
In-flight loss of control remains the leading contributor to aviation accident fatalities, with stall upsets being the leading causal factor. The February 12, 2009.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP)
NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program: Flight Test Report
This report presents results from research flights that explored the characteristics of an ice-contaminated tailplane using various simulated ice shapes attached to the leading edge of the horizontal …
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗