CEN11LA323
2011-05-05 · Arriba, Colorado, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Current FAA registration · N5192F
- Make / Model
- AIR TRACTOR INC AT-402A
- Year of manufacture
- 1999 · 12 years old at event
- Engine
- P&W PT6A SERIES (500 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 1 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19990128
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A68582
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s controlled flight into terrain for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On May 5, 2011, about 1730 mountain daylight time an Air Tractor AT-402A airplane, N5192F, impacted terrain after descending from cruise flight near Arriba, Colorado. The commercial pilot received serious injuries. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The aircraft was registered to and operated by a private individual under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 137 agricultural flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which was not operating on a flight plan. The airplane departed a private airfield about 1630. A witness observed the airplane at a low altitude heading in a southeasterly direction. Shortly after that, the airplane impacted the ground at a high rate of speed. The witness also noted that the airplane was not performing aerial application at the time. The first responders were able to assist the pilot from the airplane. The pilot was hospitalized and could not remember the details of the flight. A Federal Aviation Administration Inspector responded to the accident site, which was a wide open flat field used for farm crops and no trees or obstacles in the vicinity. The airplane had extensive damage to the airframe and no postcrash fire. All components of the airplane were accounted for at the accident site. The wreckage was recovered and a follow-up exam conducted at a salvage yard. Examination of the wreckage at the salvage yard revealed control continuity and no pre-impact abnormalities with the airframe. A visual examination of the propeller revealed that all three blades had similar bends and marks. One propeller blade had about 6-inches of the blade tip torn off. Two blades were curled towards the non-cambered side with polishing of the blades. The third blade had multiple bends. The signatures and marks on the three-bladed propeller are consistent with engine power at the time of the accident. A SOTLOC global positioning system (GPS) data card was removed from the airplane and forwarded to the NTSB Vehicle Recorders Laboratory for data extraction. Review of the SATLOC data for the accident date started near Arriba, Colorado, at 1536:40 mountain standard time [the time has not been corrected for daylight savings]. The data tracked the airplane in a northwest direction, before the airplane appeared to work an area with multiple back-n-forth tracks. An individual track was then identified as the airplane headed in an easterly direction. The data revealed the airplane was at an altitude of about 5,300 (mean sea level) and an airspeed of 140 knots. The altitude remained about the same until approximately one minute before the data ends at 1626:27. About 1625:00, the airplane started a descent from 5,300 feet and ended at an altitude of about 5,033 feet. According to Google Earth, the elevation of the ground in the general vicinity of the accident site was about 5,080 feet. In the last two minutes of data, the airplane increased its speed from about 140 knots to 158 knots, when the data ends. The pilot completed an aerial application portion of his flight and departed from the work area. The airplane collided with the ground at a high speed in a flat, open field about 7 miles from the work area. The pilot sustained serious injuries and was unable to recall any of the events preceding the accident. Postaccident examination of the airplane did not identify any preimpact abnormalities with the airframe or engine. The airplane’s three-bladed propeller displayed signatures that were consistent with the engine producing power at the time of impact. Data recovered from an on-board GPS unit tracked the airplane from departure to the accident site. The data showed that, during the final minute of the flight, the airplane’s airspeed increased and its altitude decreased. The flight profile is consistent with a controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) for undetermined reasons. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Altitude-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_CEN11LA323.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (controlled flight into terrain, cfit). All research papers
- Flight Safety Foundation 2023 · FSF / AeroSafety World Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) — A 2023 Industry Refresh
Foundation 2023 CFIT data refresh — three decades after the original CFIT Task Force eliminated >95% of air-carrier CFIT, the GA + Part 135 communities still account for most CFIT fatalities.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP) Flight Simulator Evaluation of Synthetic Vision Display Concepts to Prevent Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
In commercial aviation, over 30-percent of all fatal accidents worldwide are categorized as Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accidents, where a fully functioning airplane is inadvertently flown i…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Other Preliminary Effect of Synthetic Vision Systems Displays to Reduce Low-Visibility Loss of Control and Controlled Flight Into Terrain Accidents
An experimental investigation was conducted to study the effectiveness of Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) flight displays as a means of eliminating Low Visibility Loss of Control (LVLOC) and Controlled…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Rating the Relevance of QUORUM-Selected ASRS Incident Narratives to a "Controlled Flight into Terrain" Accident
An exploratory study was conducted to identify commercial aviation incidents that are relevant to a "controlled flight into terrain" (CFIT) accident using a NASA-developed text processing method.
- NASA NTRS 2018 · Preprint (Draft being sent to journal) CFIT Prevention Using Synthetic Vision
In commercial aviation, over 30-percent of all fatal accidents worldwide are categorized as Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accidents where a fully functioning airplane is inadvertently flown in…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2001 · Journal article (JAAER) Controlled Flight into Terrain: How the Airlines and the Federal Aviation Administration are Addressing the Problem
Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT) is not a new problem. It has been around since the beginning of manned flight. A CFIT accident occurs when an airworthy aircraft, under the control of a pilot, is…