CEN11LA494
2011-07-20 · Columbia, Missouri, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport COU
Current FAA registration · N2056S
- Make / Model
- CESSNA T210L
- Year of manufacture
- 1975 · 36 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR TSIO-520 SER (300 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19751007
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A1A7D1
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The collapse of the right main landing gear during landing due to a lack of component lubrication, which resulted in the failure of the landing gear to lock once extended.
Factual narrative
On July 20, 2011, about 1325 central daylight time, a Cessna T210L, N2056S, experienced a collapsed right main landing gear during landing at Columbia Regional Airport (COU), Columbia, Missouri. The private pilot was uninjured. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the horizontal stabilizer. The airplane was registered to and operated by Atlatl LLC under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a business flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a flight plan had not been filed for the flight destined for COU. The pilot stated that while on a visual approach to runway 20 (6,501 feet by 150 feet, concrete) and about 3 miles from COU, he moved the landing gear handle to the down position. The landing gear extended, but the landing gear indicator lights did not indicate that the landing gear was locked in the down position and he could hear the landing gear hydraulic pump running. He then cycled the gear two times, but the landing gear still would not lock into the down position. He cycled the landing gear six more times, but the landing gear did not lock down and the hydraulic pump stopped making a sound. He then extended the emergency gear pump handle and pumped it 75-100 times, which became very stiff. He flew over the airport so that air traffic control personnel could observe the landing gear, which they reported as being extended; however, the cockpit indication was indicating that the landing gear was not locked down. During final approach for landing on runway 20, he pumped the emergency gear pump handle "many more times," but the landing gear still did not lock down. During touchdown, the right main landing gear collapsed. The airplane departed the runway surface and stopped near the intersection of taxiway A2 and runway 20. The airplane struck, and broke off from its base, the hold short sign at taxiway A2. According to the Federal Aviation Administration, postaccident repair, by a maintenance facility other than the one that performed the airplane's last annual inspection, indicated that a lack of lubrication resulted in the main landing gear not locking down. Several items such as bolts, pins, and bushings were cleaned, lubricated, and adjusted after which the landing gear function normally. The airplane has flown several times without further incident. According to an airframe maintenance logbook entry dated November 12, 2010, the airplane received an annual inspection at a tachometer time of 205.1 hours and a total time 11,080.8 hours. The entry states, "Jacked aircraft serviced landing gear system... ." Items that were replaced included all of the downlock hydraulic hoses and a right hand landing gear actuator fitting. The logbook entry is included in the docket of this report. The pilot was unable to obtain cockpit landing gear down-and-locked indications while on a visual approach to the destination airport. After repeated attempts to actuate the emergency landing gear extension system, he was still unable to obtain a gear down-and-locked indication. He overflew the airport so that air traffic control personnel could observe the landing gear position, which was observed as extended. The pilot then attempted a landing, during which the right main landing gear collapsed, and the airplane veered off the runway and hit a runway sign. During the repair of the landing gear system, several components exhibited a lack of lubrication, which resulted in the landing gear failing to lock when extended. Once the components were cleaned, lubricated, and adjusted, the landing gear functioned normally. The airplane and landing gear system were last inspected and repaired about 8 months prior to the accident during which adequate lubrication of the landing gear components should have been confirmed. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Gear extension and retract sys-Malfunction - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main landing gear-Not specified - C
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Repair-Maintenance personnel
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_CEN11LA494.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…