NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN14FA328
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s inability to maintain a climb while maneuvering the airplane in high-density altitude conditions that degraded the airplane’s climb performance and his exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle-of-attack, which led to an aerodynamic stall and loss of control. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s inadequate preflight planning and his decision to fly into mountainous terrain.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn June 30, 2014 about 0849 mountain daylight time, a Piper PA-28-235, N8814W, impacted mountainous terrain at the Loveland Ski Area near Georgetown, Colorado. The pilot and two passengers were fatally injured. The airplane was destroyed, and a postimpact fire occurred. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot as a 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal cross-country flight which operated without a flight plan. The flight originated from the Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport (BJC), Broomfield, Colorado, at 0810 and was en route to Moab, Utah. A customer service manager at the fixed base operator (FBO) reported the pilot in preparing for the flight was looking for information on how to get over the mountains. At that time, there was no one at the FBO who could provide him information on mountain flying, and there was no posted information available. She later heard that the pilot planned to takeoff VFR and fly through the mountains along the interstate. A line technician reported that he met the airplane when it arrived at BJC on June 27. The line technician helped the pilot and his family with their luggage and drove them to an awaiting family car. Before they left, the pilot did a walk-around inspection of the airplane. When the line technician arrived at the airport on June 30, the pilot had already loaded the airplane. The pilot said they were going to Moab, Utah and planned to stay there a couple of days. Then they were going to fly to the Grand Canyon and spend a couple of days there before continuing to Los Angeles. The line technician said the pilot and his family were in good spirits and were not in a rush to take off. The line technician said he did not see the pilot do a preflight of the airplane but did watch him start the airplane and taxi it to the self-serve pumps. A fuel receipt from the fixed-base operator showed that the pilot loaded the airplane with 57.86 gallons of fuel. The line technician said he had indirectly heard that the pilot intended to take off and fly through the mountains along Interstate 70 to Grand Junction, Colorado. Radar data showed the airplane departed BJC to the west. At 0814:36 the airplane was at 5,500 ft mean sea level (msl) and transmitting a transponder code of 1200. The airplane then turned south and continued to climb to about 10,400 ft. Once the airplane reached Interstate 70 at Golden, Colorado, it turned west into the mountains. At 0837:25, the airplane passed over Idaho Springs, Colorado, at an altitude of 10,400 ft msl. Radar contact was lost at 0839:35 when the airplane was 9 miles west of Idaho Springs at an altitude of 10,200 ft msl. Several witnesses saw the airplane as it approached the Loveland Ski Area near Georgetown, Colorado, which is about 20 miles west of Idaho Springs. One witness said he was coming out of the Eisenhower Tunnel heading east when he saw the airplane banking hard left about 200 ft above Interstate 70. He said the airplane then "just fell out of the air and crashed." The witness said that other than the low altitude, he did not notice anything before the crash that indicated a problem. Another witness had been hiking and was taking a break at 0845 on the west ridge of a mountain north of Interstate 70 and a few miles east of the accident site. He was at 11,700 ft msl, and had a good view of the valley looking west toward Interstate 70 and the Loveland Ski Area. He said he saw an airplane coming in low and heading west toward Mount Trelease, which is just north of Interstate 70 before the Eisenhower Tunnel. The witness said the airplane was about 300 ft below his location, was going pretty fast, and was quite loud. He estimated the airplane was flying at an altitude between 11,300 ft and 11,500 ft msl. He said the airplane's path seemed pretty flat with very little gain in altitude. The witness expected the airplane to pull up as it approached Mount Trelease but the airplane did not gain any altitude. He thought the airplane would crash into the mountain, but then the airplane banked left, made a 180-degree turn east and then dropped below the ridge of Mount Sniktau south of Interstate 70. He then saw a big plume of smoke. He estimated that everything he saw took place in about 1 ½ to 2 minutes. Another witness, who was driving on a switchback road in the Loveland Ski Area saw the airplane flying west along the mountains. The airplane was at an altitude of 11,000 to 11,200 ft msl and in a high nose-up pitch attitude. The witness said he saw the airplane "break" into a left turn and enter a spin. The airplane was in a steep left bank and "deep" nose-down attitude. He watched the airplane descend rapidly and go out of view behind the trees. He rolled down his window to hear if there was a crash. When he didn't hear anything, the witness thought maybe the pilot recovered safely from the rapid descent. However, as he came to a horseshoe bend in the road, he saw the smoke from the post-impact fire. The witness said he did not hear any engine sounds before the accident because he had his car windows rolled up. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe pilot, age 42, held a private pilot certificate with an airplane single-engine land rating. According to the pilot's Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) medical records, on April 30, 2014, he reported having 278 total flying hours and having flown 60 hours in the 6 months before the examination. The pilot was issued a limited third-class medical certificate dated April 30, 2014. The certificate showed that the pilot must have glasses available for near vision. In spite of repeated efforts, no other pilot records were obtained to substantiate his training and experience beyond what was reported to the FAA. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe airplane was a Piper Aircraft Corporation model PA-28-235 Cherokee. The four-place single-engine airplane, serial number 28-10360, was manufactured in 1964 and had an airworthiness certificate classifying its operation in the normal category. The airplane was powered by one Lycoming IO-540-B4B5 carbureted engine rated at 250 horsepower at 2,800 rpm. The facility that maintained the airplane provided all records for maintenance performed on it. According to those records, the airplane underwent an annual inspection on July 5, 2013, at airframe total time 5,425.05 hours. The last maintenance was performed on April 9, 2014, at an airframe total time of 5,533.73 hours. The facility's mechanics replaced the exhaust gas temperature probe in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and performed a satisfactory operations check. The total airframe time at the accident could not be determined because of the extensive thermal damage to the airplane's tachometer and Hobbs meter. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONAt 0853, the routine aviation weather report for Centennial Airport, about 47 miles east of the accident site, was wind 120 degrees at 6 knots, 10 miles visibility, scattered clouds at 2,300 ft, temperature 78 degrees F, dew point 39 degrees F, and altimeter 30.03 inches of mercury. At 0851, the weather station for Keystone and Last Chance, Colorado, 4 miles southwest of the accident site, reported winds from the southwest at 1 mph, gusts to 7 mph, temperature 59 degrees F, dew point 32 degrees F, humidity 36 percent, and altimeter 29.78 inches of mercury. A weather model that produces estimates of the atmosphere was used for the accident area to determine density altitude, potential turbulence, and updrafts and downdrafts. Based on model temperature and dew point, and surface pressure for the surface location of the accident, 11,645 ft msl, the density altitude would be approximately 12,850 ft msl. Surface observations for wind at the accident site were approximately 15 knots. However, about 2,000 ft above the mountain peaks in the Loveland Pass area, the wind velocity increased to 30 to 40 knots. Aircraft-scale turbulence existed in the area within 2,000 ft of the terrain, and maximum updraft speeds of 300 to 500 ft per minute and maximum downdraft speeds of 300 to 400 ft per minute existed near the accident site. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe airplane was a Piper Aircraft Corporation model PA-28-235 Cherokee. The four-place single-engine airplane, serial number 28-10360, was manufactured in 1964 and had an airworthiness certificate classifying its operation in the normal category. The airplane was powered by one Lycoming IO-540-B4B5 carbureted engine rated at 250 horsepower at 2,800 rpm. The facility that maintained the airplane provided all records for maintenance performed on it. According to those records, the airplane underwent an annual inspection on July 5, 2013, at airframe total time 5,425.05 hours. The last maintenance was performed on April 9, 2014, at an airframe total time of 5,533.73 hours. The facility's mechanics replaced the exhaust gas temperature probe in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and performed a satisfactory operations check. The total airframe time at the accident could not be determined because of the extensive thermal damage to the airplane's tachometer and Hobbs meter. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONThe accident site was located on the side of a mountain slope at an elevation of 11,645 ft msl. The airplane wreckage was spread along a 186 ft-long down-sloping path through a forest of Subalpine fir trees on a 246-degree magnetic heading. The elevation where the main wreckage was at was 10,960 ft. The first point of impact was a Subalpine fir tree that was broken off about 69 ft above the ground. The airplane's left wing tip, two sections of the left outboard wing, and the left aileron were found about 45 ft west-southwest of the first impact point resting on the ground, and they were crushed and broken aft at mid-span. Pieces of cut wood, broken branches, Fiberglas, and paint chips were scattered across the ground beginning at the first point of impact and running along the accident site heading for about 147 ft. Several pieces of cut wood showed a cut angle of 45 degrees with black paint transfer in the wood fibers along the cut edge. The terrain from the first point of impact to where the airplane's main wreckage came to rest was down-sloping at an angle of about 18 degrees. The main wreckage, which consisted of the airplane's engine, propeller, cabin, right wing, left inboard wing, both main landing gear, baggage compartment, aft fuselage, and empennage rested inverted at the base of four Subalpine fir trees. These components were charred, melted, and consumed by fire. A burned area about 75 ft long and 54 ft wide surrounded the main wreckage. Several trees knocked down by the airplane were also located in the burned area. Continuity from the control yokes and rudder pedals to the aileron bellcranks, stabilator crosstube, and rudder horns was confirmed at the accident site. The right aileron control surface was charred and melted. The rudder and stabilator surfaces were consumed by fire. The airplane wreckage was retained for further examination. MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATIONThe results of an autopsy performed on the pilot on July 3, 2014 by the Jefferson County Coroner's Office, Golden, Colorado, showed cause of death due to loss of blood secondary to laceration-transection of the aorta related to blunt force trauma sustained in the accident. The FAA's Civil Aerospace Medical Institute performed forensic toxicology on specimens from the pilot. Test results were negative for all tests conducted. TESTS AND RESEARCHThe airplane wreckage, engine, and propeller were examined at Greeley, Colorado, on July 14, 2014. An examination of the airframe wreckage confirmed continuity from the flap handle to the flaps; however, the position of the flaps could not be determined. An examination of the elevator trim cable determined the trim was at the neutral position. The fuel selector handle and valve were examined; however, the tank position selection could not be determined due to the extensive thermal damage. The engine crankshaft and camshaft rotated freely. All valves and pistons moved freely. All cylinders showed good compression. A borescope examination of the cylinders showed no anomalies. Both magnetos were removed and examined. The magnetos' couplers could not be tested due to the extensive thermal damage. The oil screen was removed and examined and was clean. The fuel pump, air filter, and vacuum pump showed extensive thermal damage. The carburetor body showed extensive thermal damage, and the floats were bent and broken. The propeller was removed from the engine's flange and disassembled. Blade A showed torsional bending, chordwise scratches, and leading edge gouges. The outer 4 inches of the blade tip was broken in overload. The blade pitch knob was sheared off. Blade B was straight and showed nicks along the leading edge. The outer 9 inches of the blade was bent aft 90 degrees. On July 2, 2014, Lockheed Martin flight service (LMFS) was contacted to determine if the pilot received any services or filed a flight plan. LMFS responded that neither it nor the Data Transformation Corporation Direct User Access Terminal Service (DUATS) provided any services to the accident pilot. Further, the Computer Science Corporation DUATS did not provide weather information to the pilot. Fuel Testing A fuel sample from the BJC fixed-base operator self-serve pump from which the pilot fueled his airplane just before the flight was secured and tested. The test results indicated the fuel was good and showed no presence of water or contaminants. Density Altitude FAA Pamphlet FAA-P-8740-2 (2008) "Density Altitude" defines density altitude as "pressure altitude corrected for non-standard temperature variations." Density altitude can affect aircraft performance. As density altitude increases, air density decreases, which results in decreased aircraft performance. According to the Koch chart on page 3 of the pamphlet, based on the conditions at the time of the accident, 59 degrees F and pressure altitude of about 11,645 ft, the airplane's climb rate would have been reduced by more than 90 percent. A customer service manager at the fixed-base operator (FBO) reported that the pilot, who was preparing for the cross-country flight, was looking for information on how to fly over the mountains. At that time, there was no one at the FBO who could provide him information on mountain flying, and no posted information was available. She later heard that the pilot planned to take off under visual flight rules and fly through the mountains along the interstate. Radar data showed that the airplane took off to the west, turned south, and then climbed to about 10,400 ft mean sea level (msl). Once the airplane reached the interstate, it turned west toward the mountains and followed the interstate. About 25 minutes after taking off, when the airplane was at 10,200 ft msl, radar contact with the airplane was lost. Witnesses near the accident site were consistent with their accounts, which indicated that the airplane was flying between about 11,000 and 11,500 ft msl (200 to 300 ft above the ground) with the engine producing power. The airplane was in a nose-high attitude when it started turning left away from rising terrain. The airplane then turned about 180 degrees, rolled over to the left, and entered a steep dive before impacting trees and terrain. One of the witnesses indicated that, before the left turn, the airplane's path seemed pretty flat with little gain in altitude. A postimpact fire ensued, which consumed most of the airplane. A postaccident examination confirmed flight control continuity and revealed no preimpact anomalies with the engine or airplane systems that would have precluded normal operation. The pilot did not use any weather or flight planning services. No evidence was found that the pilot had obtained training in mountain flying. A weather model determined that, at the time of the accident, the density altitude was about 12,850 ft, which would have reduced the airplane's climb rate by more than 90 percent. It is likely that, as the pilot attempted to cross over the mountainous terrain, he raised the airplane's nose such that the airplane was beyond its critical angle-of-attack, which, combined with the airplane's decreased climb performance, led to an aerodynamic stall and loss of control. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Aircraft capability-Climb capability-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Angle of attack-Not attained/maintained - C
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Temp/humidity/pressure-High density altitude-Effect on operation
- F Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot - F
- — Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Training-(general)-Pilot
- F Personnel issues-Task performance-Planning/preparation-Flight planning/navigation-Pilot - F
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_CEN14FA328.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, loss of control, turbulence, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
Political Turbulence and Aviation Safety: A Cross-National Analysis of Political Stability's Effects on Aviation Accidents
To what extent does political stability affect aviation safety? This research aims to link domestic political conditions and public safety through the consideration of aviation accident frequency.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2021 · Accident report
Crash of Atlas Air Flight 3591, Boeing 767-300 (N1217A)
Atlas Air 3591 crashed into Trinity Bay, Texas, February 23, 2019. Investigation of the in-flight loss-of-control crash of Atlas Air 3591 into Trinity Bay, Texas.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Comparative Study on the Prediction of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Mini - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Turbulence Models
When dealing with CFD simulations the turbulent nature is seen on most of the engineering flows and these flows need to be solved.
- arXiv 2020 · arXiv preprint
Numerical Simulation of Iced Wing Using Separating Shear Layer Fixed Turbulence Models
Aerodynamic prediction of glaze ice accretion on airfoils and wing is studied using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes method.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Prediction of stall and post-stall behavior of airfoils at low and high Reynolds numbers
An interactive boundary-layer method, together with the e(super n)-approach to the calculation of transition, has been used to predict the stall and post-stall behavior of airfoils at low and high Rey…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗