CEN15LA114
2015-01-09 · Pontiac, Illinois, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PNT
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The flight instructor’s loss of directional control during an attempted go-around with a crosswind. Contributing to the accident was the loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined during examination of the engine.
Factual narrative
On January 9, 2015, about 1100 central standard time, a Cessna 150G airplane, N2871S, was substantially damaged when it impacted the ground and nosed over following a loss of engine power during a go-around from runway 24 at the Pontiac Municipal Airport (PNT), Pontiac, Illinois. The flight instructor was not injured and the student pilot reported minor injuries. The airplane sustained damage to the wing, vertical stabilizer and rudder. The aircraft was registered to and operated by Griffith Aviation under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as an instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which was not operated on a flight plan. The flight originated from the Griffith-Merrillville Airport (05C), Griffith, Indiana, about 1000.The student pilot reported that they were making a straight in approach to runway 24 at PNT. At this time the student pilot was manipulating the airplane controls. The attempted landing resulted in a go-around and the flight instructor took control of the airplane. Another landing attempt was made with the flight instructor manipulating the controls and the student observing. During the landing the airplane "was not steady and would bounce". The flight instructor attempted a go-around and advanced the throttle control. During the climb, the student pilot heard "a sound," and the airplane veered to the left and stopped climbing. He said that when the airplane touched down it flipped over. The flight instructor reported that while performing a go-around, the engine began to sputter. He stated that when he pushed the carburetor heat control forward, the engine quit. He stated that this occurred when the airplane was about 5 ft above ground level. The right crosswind pushed the airplane to the left. The flight instructor attempted to land in a field to the right of the runway but the airplane landing gear sunk into the snow and the airplane nosed over. Examination of the airplane failed to reveal any defects although the wings had been removed for transport and the engine had been removed in preparation for examination. A complete teardown examination of the airplane's engine was performed following the accident. No defects were found. The carburetor was disassembled and the fuel bowl was clean and no defects were noted. The weather conditions at the accident airport at 1055 were: Wind 290 degrees at 20 knots gusting to 26 knots; 10 statute miles visibility; overcast ceiling at 2,200 feet above ground level; temperature -14 degrees Celsius; dew point -18 degrees Celsius; altimeter setting 30.38 inches of mercury. According to a carburetor icing probability graph, the recorded temperature and dew point were outside of the range of susceptibility for carburetor icing. The runway used for the attempted landing, runway 24, was 5,000 ft long and 75 ft wide. The student pilot reported that there was no snow or ice on the runway, but there were snow banks along the sides of the runway. According to the flight instructor, the student pilot was attempting to land the airplane but conducted an attempted go-around. The flight instructor then took control of the airplane. The student pilot reported that, as the flight instructor was attempting the second landing, the airplane bounced, at which time, the flight instructor initiated a go-around. The flight instructor reported that the engine then began to sputter and that, when he turned off the carburetor heat, the engine quit as the airplane was about 5 ft above the ground. He further stated that a right crosswind pushed the airplane to the left and that he subsequently attempted to land the airplane in a field left of the runway; however, the landing gear sunk into the snow, and the airplane subsequently nosed over. Examination of the airplane, engine, and carburetor revealed no anomalies. The reason for the loss of engine power could not be determined. Based on the available information, it is likely that the flight instructor lost directional control during the attempted go-around, which resulted in an off-runway landing and a subsequent nose-over. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- F Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - F
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Instructor/check pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Yaw control-Not attained/maintained - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_CEN15LA114.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, go-around). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…