CEN17LA058
2016-12-18 · Blaine, Minnesota, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Current FAA registration · N4204B
- Make / Model
- BELLANCA 17-30A
- Year of manufacture
- 1974 · 42 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR IO 520 SERIES (285 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19741127
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A4FE85
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power due to a lack of crankshaft lubrication to the No. 4 connecting rod journal.
Factual narrative
On December 18, 2016, about 1500 central standard time, a Bellanca 17-30A airplane, N4204B, was substantially damaged during a forced landing near Blaine, Minnesota. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was registered to and operated by Bel Vik LLC under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which departed about 1420 from Range Regional Airport (HIB), Hibbing, Minnesota, and was destined for Flying Cloud Airport (FCM), Minneapolis, Minnesota. The pilot stated the airplane was launched from a heated hangar at FCM. After landing at HIB, two passengers were deplaned. The airplane remained on the ground at HIB about 15 minutes, with no fuel added. During departure from HIB, the temperature was minus 6 degrees F. While in cruise flight at 2,500 ft msl, at an estimated temperature of minus 10 degrees F, the engine lost power. After the pilot switched fuel tanks and turned on the fuel boost pump, engine power was restored. Due to uncertainty with fuel status, the pilot diverted towards Anoka County–Blaine Airport (ANE), Blaine, Minnesota. Approaching ANE, the engine began to knock and subsequently seized. The pilot executed a forced landing onto a road, during which the airplane's left wing impacted a sign. Examination of the engine at the accident site revealed the top portion of the right and left crankcases were broken, with crankcase material missing and damaged internal engine components visible, including a fractured connecting rod cap. The engine breather tube was frozen over, with no alternate breather hole present. The propeller shaft seal was partially protruded. The engine, which has a normal oil capacity of 12 quarts, contained about 5 quarts of oil. Most of the oil loss occurred through the holes in the crankcase, with some oil loss through propeller shaft seal. The engine was shipped to the Continental Motors facility at Mobile, Alabama. Examination revealed all rocker arms and shafts were undamaged and all valves were intact, with normal combustion signatures. The induction components, ignition components, and fuel pump were not damaged. The fuel pump was bench tested and performed within specifications. Internal engine damage did not allow for rotation of the crankshaft. Following split of the crankcase, the Nos. 3 and 4 cylinder skirts were found to be mechanically damaged by internal components, with the Nos. 3 and 4 pistons wedged in their respective cylinders. Both crankcase halves were internally damaged by rotating components. The Nos. 3 and 4 connecting rods were damaged, with their respective rod caps separated. The remaining four connecting rods were not damaged. The Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6 connecting rod bearings exhibited overlay fatigue, dirt embedment and corrosion. The No. 3 and 4 connecting rod bearings displayed significant heat distress and severe damage. The crankshaft's No. 4 connecting-rod journal was severely damaged due to heat distress. The oil galleys and transfer tubes were examined with additional lighting, which revealed that no blockages were present. Each of the five main bearings were intact, with an insignificant amount of contamination. The transfer collar exhibited normal operation patterns. The oil cooler was not damaged and the oil system vernitherm (thermostat) was removed and tested, with normal results. The oil pressure relief valve had evidence of an unapproved sealant on the oil pressure relief valve body. The engine was equipped with a reusable oil screen, versus a spin-on full flow oil filter. The reusable oil screen contained ferrous and non-ferrous metal contaminants. The recommended oil change interval for an engine with a reusable oil screen was every 25 hours or 4 months, according to Continental Motors Standard Practices Publications. A review of logbooks prior to 2011 revealed a history of erratic oil changes, including intervals of 45, 48, 66, 80, and 84 hours. The airplane was involved in a hard landing in 2011 and was not flown for about 5 years. After purchase by the current owner, an annual was performed on February 1, 2016, and an oil change occurred on August 8, 2016. Phillips 20-50WC oil, which has a pour point of minus 27 F, was utilized for both the annual and subsequent oil change. After dropping off two passengers on an extremely cold morning, the commercial pilot departed for the return flight home. During cruise flight at 2,500 ft mean sea level, the engine experienced a total loss of power. The pilot restarted the engine; shortly thereafter, the engine lost power a second time. The pilot executed a forced landing onto a road, during which the left wing was damaged. An engine teardown revealed significant heat distress to the crankshaft No. 4 connecting rod journal, as well as the Nos. 3 and 4 connecting rod bearings. The heat distress resulted in fracture of the Nos. 3 and 4 connecting rod caps and subsequent seizure of the engine. The Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6 connecting rod bearings exhibited overlay fatigue, dirt embedment and corrosion, consistent with inadequate oil lubrication. A review of the engine maintenance logbooks revealed a history of oil changes at inconsistent intervals, which included much longer intervals than those recommended by the manufacturer; however, the effect of the inconsistent maintenance could not be determined based on the available information. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng liquid cooling-Failure - C
- — Environmental issues-Physical environment-Object/animal/substance-Sign/marker-Contributed to outcome
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2016_CEN17LA058.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…