CEN20FA076
2020-02-08 · Granbury, Texas, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport GDJ
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack while maneuvering in the airport traffic pattern, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and loss of control.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn February 8, 2020, at 1317 central standard time, a Beech F33A airplane, N6665U, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Granbury, Texas. The pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. A review of the recorded radar and automatic dependent surveillance – broadcast (ADS-B) data revealed that the airplane approached Granbury Regional Airport (GDJ), Granbury, Texas, from the northwest about 1301 and overflew runway 14 at 900 ft above ground level (agl). After overflying the runway, the airplane turned right toward the northwest on a wide downwind leg and gradually descended to about 400 ft agl. The airplane made a right base turn, where the first set of data ended at 1305:07, about 440 ft agl, and 93 knots groundspeed. At 1314:18, radar data showed a target on the southwest side of GDJ that proceeded to the north toward the accident site and ended at 1316:51. The accident site was located 0.39 nautical miles north-northeast of the final radar return. Figure 1 shows the recorded flight track with the accident site and GDJ airport labeled. Figure 1 – Radar and ADS-B track in red with the accident site and GDJ airport labeled Further review of the ADS-B data showed that at least three other airplanes were also flying in the immediate GDJ airport environment at the same time as the accident airplane. As the accident airplane was on short final, one airplane had just departed GDJ and proceeded southeast. The second airplane was in a right traffic pattern and ahead of the accident airplane. The third airplane was circling above the traffic pattern, then descended and followed the accident airplane into the traffic pattern. The pilot of this third airplane remembered the accident airplane and stated that he entered the traffic pattern behind it and completed an S-turn maneuver for appropriate spacing. He continued in the pattern behind the accident airplane and watched it land and taxi toward the hangars and did not see the airplane again. The GDJ airport manager stated that his employees did not see the accident airplane arrive that day. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe pilot recently completed a flight review on January 7, 2020. The flight was a 1.2-hour round trip from Mineral Wells Airport (MWL), Mineral Wells, Texas, to GDJ and back, and included steep turns, slow flight, stalls, cross-country navigation, preflight planning, autopilot use, and three takeoffs and landings. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe responding Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector spoke to an MWL airport employee who fueled the accident airplane before the pilot departed on the accident flight. She stated that the pilot requested fuel "to the slots," and she added 13 gallons of fuel to obtain that level. The fuel filler port placards on the airplane wings stated, "CAP TO TAB SLOT 35 GAL (32 USABLE)." AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe responding Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector spoke to an MWL airport employee who fueled the accident airplane before the pilot departed on the accident flight. She stated that the pilot requested fuel "to the slots," and she added 13 gallons of fuel to obtain that level. The fuel filler port placards on the airplane wings stated, "CAP TO TAB SLOT 35 GAL (32 USABLE)." WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONThe accident site was located in an area of flat, rocky terrain about 3.75 miles northwest of GDJ at 830 ft mean sea level. The airplane impacted the ground in a 45° nose-down attitude and was oriented on a 068° true heading. The empennage was bent upward and slightly to the left, and the elevators rested on a tree. The airplane remained situated on top of the initial ground impact marks. Examination of the wreckage revealed that the leading edges of both wings were breached at the rivet lines and were split open. The fuel bladders in each wing had ruptured and were significantly damaged. A large portion of the right main fuel bladder and the entire fuel transmitter assembly had been ejected and were found about 10 ft in front of the wing. The wing tip tanks sustained impact damage and large portions of the tanks were fractured and displaced forward and outward. The dirt and organic debris in front of the wings was displaced forward. The fuel selector handle was positioned to the left main tank. The flap actuator revealed that the flaps were retracted during the impact and also the landing gear were found extended. Flight control continuity was established, and the examination did not reveal any mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the engine revealed that most of the impact damage was sustained to the bottom of the engine. Crankshaft and camshaft continuity were confirmed when the crankshaft was rotated by hand. Five of six cylinders produced suction and compression and the sixth cylinder exhibited impact damage to the intake pushrod. The inside of each cylinder was examined with a lighted borescope; the cylinders displayed normal operating signatures with no anomalies noted. The spark plug electrodes all displayed normal wear and operating signatures. The fuel manifold valve remained attached to its installation point and was undamaged. The fuel line from the fuel flow transducer and the manifold valve was disconnected from the transducer and a small amount of liquid was drained. Its odor was consistent with fuel; the liquid was clear in color and tested negative for water. A small amount of gray, fibrous material was found in the fuel system in several places but was of insufficient quantity to affect fuel passage. The material was found in the unfiltered side of the manifold valve, in the inlet screen of the metering assembly, and in the fuel selector strainer. The propeller assembly was found in the initial impact crater embedded in the ground under the engine and was impact-separated from the engine crankshaft. Two of the propeller blades remained attached to the hub; one blade was mostly straight and unremarkable and the other was bent slightly forward. The third blade had separated from the hub; it was found directly under the engine and was bent aft about mid-span. This blade also exhibited about one foot of scratches and superficial damage near the blade root. MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATIONThe Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Tarrant County Medical Examiner's District, Tarrant County, Texas, performed an autopsy of the pilot. The pilot's cause of death was massive blunt force trauma. The FAA Forensic Sciences Laboratory performed toxicology testing on specimens from the pilot. The specimens were positive for ethanol and propanol in the muscle, which were likely post-mortem. There were no drugs or medications detected. The pilot was conducting a personal flight to a nearby airport. Flight tracking information and a statement from another pilot indicated that the pilot overflew the runway, entered the airport traffic pattern, landed, and taxied the airplane off the runway. About 7 minutes later, the airplane was captured on radar as it flew downwind in the traffic pattern and proceeded north. About 2 minutes later, the radar data ended; the accident site was located 0.39 nautical mile north-northeast of the final radar return. The airplane impacted trees and terrain in a nose-low attitude with minimal forward momentum and a slightly twisted empennage, consistent with an aerodynamic stall/spin. Examination of the airplane did not reveal any mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. It is likely that the pilot was flying an extended pattern and turning from the base to final legs of the pattern when he exceeded the airplane's critical angle of attack, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall, loss of control, and impact with terrain. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Airspeed-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2020_CEN20FA076.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, loss of control, autopilot). All research papers
- arXiv 2020 · arXiv preprint A Lean and Highly-automated Model-Based Software Development Process Based on DO-178C/DO-331
The emergence of a global market for urban air mobility and unmanned aerial systems has attracted many startups across the world.
- NASA NTRS 1995 · Conference Paper Human Factor Implications of the Eurocopter AS332L-1 Super Puma cockpit
The purpose of this paper is to identify and describe some of the human factor problems which can occur in the cockpit of a modern civilian helicopter.
- AOPA Air Safety Institute 2024 · Annual report (Nall Report) 33rd Joseph T. Nall Report — General Aviation Accidents in 2022
The annual Joseph T. Nall Report from the AOPA Air Safety Institute summarizes general aviation accidents and causal factors for calendar year 2022.
- Semantic Scholar 2016 · Article (Interacción) Trajectory Recovery System: Angle of Attack Guidance for Inflight Loss of Control
This paper describes the design and development of an ecological display to aid pilots in the recovery of an In-Flight Loss of Control event due to a Stall (ILOC-S).
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2010 · Accident report Loss of Control on Approach — Colgan Air Flight 3407
Colgan Air 3407 / Continental Connection (Q400) Buffalo NY, February 12, 2009 — 50 fatalities. Definitive investigation of the Colgan 3407 stall-stick-pusher crash on approach to Buffalo.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Robust Adaptive Sliding-Mode Control for Damaged Fixed-Wing UAVs
Many unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can remain aerodynamically flyable after sustaining structural or control surface damage, yet insufficient robustness in conventional autopilots often leads to mis…