CEN21LA213
2021-05-11 · Merrill, Wisconsin, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport RRL
Current FAA registration · N793Y
- Make / Model
- BEECH C23
- Year of manufacture
- 1979 · 42 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING O&VO-360 SER (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19790510
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AAC550
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of engine power due to tappet failure.
Factual narrative
On May 11, 2021, at 1500 central daylight time, a Beech C23, N793Y, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Merrill, Wisconsin. The pilot and passenger received minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that he was returning to the airport after a 1-hour flight. When the airplane was about 5 miles from the airport and descending through about 1,300 ft above ground level, the engine started to run rough and gradually lost power. The pilot switched fuel tanks and cycled the magnetos, with no change in the engine power. He executed an off-airport forced landing. The airplane touched down, the landing gear collapsed, and the airplane slid to a stop coming to rest upright. The airplane sustained substantial damage to both wings and fuselage. Examination of the engine found that the oil filter contained metallic particles consistent with tappet material. Further examination revealed 7 of the 8 tappets were destroyed. The tappets were removed for further examination. Examination of the tappets by the National Transportation Safety Board Materials Laboratory revealed that the tappets fractured from overstress. The fracture started along the heads facing their corresponding camshaft lobes, which proceeded towards the back surface. While there were no indications of pre-existing cracks, such as from fatigue, there was evidence of pitting and surface wear on many of the tappet head faces that contact the camshaft. Of note was the No. 2 exhaust tappet, the only tappet that underwent wear on the tappet face significant enough to change its geometry. Figure 1 shows the No. 2 exhaust tappet face, which was reflective and consistent with polishing from repeated contact with the mating camshaft lobe. The depression at the center of the tappet head corresponding to the stem exhibited circular wear marks. The fracture surface on the bottom of the figure was circular, conforming to the geometry of the stem radius. Figure 2 shows the widespread spalling of the remaining surface, demonstrating the degree of material loss on this part. Review of the engine logbooks revealed that the engine was overhauled on February 19, 2002, and installed on the accident airplane on February 1, 2019. The last annual inspection was completed on February 24, 2021. At the time of the accident, the engine had about 838 hours of operation since overhaul. No record of tappet replacement was found in the maintenance records. The engine manufacturer recommends overhaul of the engine at 2,000 hours, or 12 years in service, whichever comes first. An oil sample collected on May 11, 2021, before the accident flight, was sent in for analysis. The vendor who conducted the oil sample analysis provided an oil sample report. Nothing remarkable was found in the oil sample report. Figure 1. View of the #2 exhaust tappet head. Figure 2. Worn areas of the #2 exhaust tappet head, showing spalling and pitting. The pilot reported that he was returning to the airport after a 1-hour flight when the engine started to run rough and gradually lost power. The pilot switched fuel tanks and cycled the magnetos, with no change in the power loss. He executed an off airport forced landing. The landing gear collapsed during the landing and the airplane slid to a stop coming to rest upright. The airplane sustained substantial damage to both wings and fuselage. Examination of the engine found that the oil filter contained metallic particles that were determined to be consistent with tappet material. Further examination revealed 7 of the 8 tappets were destroyed. A metallurgical examination of the tappets revealed that the tappets fractured from overstress. The fracture started along the heads facing their corresponding camshaft lobes, which proceeded towards the back surface. While there were no indications of pre-existing cracks, such as from fatigue, there was evidence of pitting and surface wear on many of the tappet head faces that contact the camshaft. Of note was the No.2 exhaust tappet, the only tappet that underwent wear on the tappet face significant enough to change its geometry. The engine was overhauled 19 years before the accident and had accumulated 838 hours since the overhaul. The engine manufacturer recommends overhaul of the engine at 2,000 hours, or 12 years in service, whichever comes first. No record of tappet replacement was found in the maintenance records. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng cyl section-Failure
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2021_CEN21LA213.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.