NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN21LA319
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The wear-related failure of the airframe fuel boost pump, which resulted in fuel starvation and a loss of engine power.
Factual narrative
On July 13, 2021, at 1654 central daylight time, an Air Tractor Inc. AT-401, N7315P, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near Carroll, Iowa. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 137 as an aerial application flight. The pilot stated that he had completed half of the planned aerial application of a field when the engine lost power coming out of a turn. The pilot then performed a forced landing. The airplane impacted terrain and sustained substantial damage to its wings. The airplane was modified by the installation of a Walter M601E-11 turbine engine through supplemental type certificate SA01281CH issued to Johnson Airspray Inc. On-scene examination of the engine by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) principal maintenance inspector and representatives from GE Aviation revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Subsequent removal and testing of the engine-driven fuel pump and fuel control revealed that both units met test specifications. During the on-scene examination, a crane was used to level the aircraft, which ensured that the airplane header fuel tank was full. The main fuel line from the airplane fuel filters to the engine-driven fuel pump was disconnected at the fuel pump end and placed in a bucket to capture fuel. The electric-driven airframe inline boost pump was turned on, and there was no fuel flow from the main fuel line. The B-nut on the hose from the header tank to the selector valve was loosened at the selector valve end to confirm there was fuel in the header tank, and fuel was noted to be present. The B-nut was retightened, and the output fuel line from the airframe boost pump was loosened; a small amount of fuel dripped. The dripping could be stopped and started by opening and closing the airplane fuel selector valve. The airframe boost pump was again turned on; there was no steady flow output; and there was no bypass of fuel. The airframe boost pump was removed for further testing and examination at its manufacturer. The airframe boost pump was a Weldon pump, part number 2003-B, serial number 130661, manufacturing date August 6, 2007. The pump was sent to the facilities of Weldon Pump for testing and examination under the supervision of an FAA aviation safety inspector. During testing, the pump was placed on a test stand and power was applied. The pump energized and turned; however, there was no fuel output, and fuel leaked from the shaft seal. The pump bypass was also checked on the test stand with no restrictions noted; fuel was able to flow through the pump. Disassembly of the pump from its electric motor revealed the motor’s slotted shaft was worn to the point that it would not engage with the pump’s rotor tang. Weldon Pump representatives stated that the company recommended a 10-year overhaul requirement of the pump. There was no time-in-service requirement in Weldon Pump’s recommendation. An airplane logbook record, dated July 8, 2013, with an hour meter reading of 2,497.8 hours, stated, “R&R FUEL PUMP P/N 2003B WITH OH UNIT. OPS CHECK GOOD.” At the time of the accident, the hour meter indicated 5,136.7 hours. The commercial pilot had completed half of a planned aerial application of a field when the airplane’s engine lost power. The pilot performed a forced landing to a field which resulted in substantial damage to both wings. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed the inline airframe fuel boost pump would not provide normal fuel output due to wear of the pump motor shaft and leakage of the pump seal. The pump also did not bypass fuel during the on-scene examination but did bypass fuel during testing at the pump manufacturer. The differences in bypass test results were most likely due to plumbing differences between the airplane and the test fixture. The pump manufacturer recommended a 10-year overhaul of the pump and did not provide an hours-in-service overhaul recommendation. The pump was manufactured in 2007, and an airplane logbook record indicated it had been last overhauled in 2013. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Fuel system-Fuel pumps-Fatigue/wear/corrosion
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2021_CEN21LA319.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗