CEN21LA416
2021-09-10 · Hot Springs, South Dakota, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport HSR
Current FAA registration · N9343B
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 175
- Year of manufacture
- 1958 · 63 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR GO-300 SERIES (175 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19580326
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S ACF748
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The tensile overload failure of the main landing gear attachment bolt, which resulted in separation of the left main landing gear and a loss of control during landing.
Factual narrative
On September 10, 2021, about 1040 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 175 airplane, N9343B, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Hot Springs, South Dakota. The pilot and three passengers were not injured. The airplane was being operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that the airplane touched down “with a gentle skip then easing forward on the yoke pinned my main gear firmly on the turf.” During the landing roll, the airplane began to veer to the right, and the pilot applied rudder inputs to correct. The airplane subsequently spun around and came to rest upright with the left main landing gear leg separated. The pilot stated the airplane was modified to conventional landing gear through a supplemental type certificate (STC) SA383GL kit in 2013. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed the left wing was bent, and the main landing gear box structure was wrinkled. An attachment bolt for the left main landing gear strut was found fractured and separated from the strut. The National Transportation Safety Board Materials Laboratory examined the fractured bolt and the attachment strut plate. According to the STC SA383GL, the inboard end of each main landing gear strut was attached to the upper side of the strut plate. Each strut inboard attachment bolt was threaded into a self-locking nut plate attached to the lower surface of the strut plate. Examination of the bolt revealed that most of the bolt threads were sheared, and the bolt shank was fractured through the uppermost thread adjacent to the grip. The bolt fracture surface had a dished fracture surface with matte gray features consistent with ductile overstress fracture. Bolt thread remnants were observed trapped between threads on the inner diameter of the nut plate, including between the threads at the bottom of the nut plate. The 0.49-inch-thick strut plate was bent downward at the forward and aft ends relative to the middle. The upper plate surface had a machined surface finish and did not show any evidence of fretting contact damage. The bolt head markings were consistent with an Army-Navy (AN) standard bolt. The measured average bolt hardness corresponded to an estimated ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 142,000 pounds per square inch (psi); the expected minimum tensile strength is 125,000 psi. The composition of the strut plate was identified as consistent with aluminum alloy 2014. The measured average plate material hardness was above the typical hardness range for an alloy 2014 plate. The pilot reported the airplane touched down “with a gentle skip then easing forward on the yoke pinned my main gear firmly on the turf.” During the landing roll, the airplane began to veer to the right, and the pilot applied rudder inputs to correct. The airplane subsequently spun around and came to rest upright with the left main landing gear leg separated. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing and main landing gear box structure. An attachment bolt for the left main landing gear strut was found fractured and separated from the strut. Metallurgical examination of the fractured bolt and the landing gear strut plate revealed the bolt fractured due to tensile overload that led to shearing of the bolt threads. The bolt was fully threaded into the self-locking nut plate and there was no evidence of looseness before the failure. The damage pattern of the fractured bolt and bent strut plate were consistent with an overload failure of the inboard attachment with no evidence of any preexisting damage or weakness in the attachment. It is likely the main landing gear failure was the result of excessive loading on the attachment during the landing. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main landing gear attach sec-Capability exceeded
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Main landing gear attach sec-Failure
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-(general)-(general)-Pilot
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-(general)-Not attained/maintained
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2021_CEN21LA416.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (loss of control). All research papers
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2019 · Accident report Embraer ERJ 175 Runway Excursion at Charlotte Douglas
Republic Airline ERJ-175 runway excursion CLT, January 2018. Examines a low-energy runway excursion involving misuse of autobrakes + thrust reverser response after a high-crosswind landing on a contam…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Loss of Control In-Flight (LOC-I) — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary comprehensive knowledge-base entry on Loss of Control In-Flight — definitions, contributing factors, accident case studies (Air France 447, Colgan 3407), and prevention strategies.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (International Conference on Networking and Services) Risk Assessment of Loss of Control In-Flight Trajectories for Urban Air Mobility Safety
In Urban Air Mobility (UAM), maintaining a minimum separation between aircraft is a safety requirement, which becomes challenging amidst congested air traffic and off-nominal conditions, such as Loss …
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2022 · Accident report Loss of Control on Takeoff in Icing Conditions — Citation 560XL
Cessna Citation 560XL fatal takeoff icing accident, March 2018. Investigation of a Citation 560XL loss-of-control takeoff accident in icing conditions.
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aviation) ANALYSIS OF GENERAL AVIATION FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS INVOLVING INFLIGHT LOSS OF CONTROL USING A STATE-BASED APPROACH
Inflight loss of control (LOC-I) is a significant cause of General Aviation (GA) fixed-wing aircraft accidents. The United States National Transportation Safety Board’s database provides a rich source…