CEN22LA152
2022-03-25 · Ash Flat, Arkansas, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport CVK
Current FAA registration · N8869V
- Make / Model
- BELLANCA 17-30A
- Year of manufacture
- 1971 · 51 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR IO 520 SERIES (285 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19710818
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AC37C6
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The partial loss of engine power during a go-around resulting in an inadvertent entry into an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the inexperience of the low-time pilot.
Factual narrative
On March 25, 2022, about 1630 central standard time, a Bellanca 17-30A airplane, N8869V, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Ash Flat, Arkansas. The pilot was seriously injured. The airplane was operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. The 80-hour pilot reported that he departed the Baxter County Airport (KBPK), Mountain Home, Arkansas, and it was the airplane’s first flight since the annual inspection. The flight back to the Sharp County Regional Airport (KCVK), Ash Flat, Arkansas, was uneventful until the airplane approached runway 22 to land. The pilot stated that when the airplane flew over the runway numbers, the wind suddenly became “super gusty.” When the airplane became unstable, he performed a go-around. When he added throttle, the engine stopped producing power and due to the low altitude, he was unable to perform an engine restart. He performed a forced landing near the runway but impacted terrain. The Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the airplane. He confirmed flight control continuity. In addition, he found the right fuel tank full and the left fuel tank with a significant amount of fuel. The airplane was transported to a salvage facility for further examination. The postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the engine controls remained properly secured to the engine and actuated normally. The left magneto was found to contain water; however, the wreckage had been stored outside partially tarped. When opening the secured baggage compartment, a fuel tester was found full of water, suggesting the water present in the magneto likely accumulated during storage. No other anomalies were detected with the engine. The airplane’s EDM-900 was downloaded, and the information plotted. The data was not time coded but did show a sharp reduction of horsepower, exhaust gas temperatures, fuel flow, and rpm, that restored briefly before dropping off, likely due to the accident. The responding FAA inspector located a GoPro camera in the wreckage and retrieved the files. The files were submitted to the NTSB Vehicle Recorders Laboratory for summary and sound spectrum analysis. The video showed that the airplane was attempting to land on runway 22. A flag was visible on the airport property and the wind appeared to be from the northwest. The airplane continued over the runway markings, but the airplane appeared to float. The airplane’s stall warning horn was briefly audible. A sound consistent with a slight increase in engine rpm was detected as the nose of the airplane drifted to the left and the airplane was no longer aligned with the centerline of the runway. The nose of the airplane pitched up and the stall warning horn was briefly heard, and the airplane appeared to slowly gain altitude. The airplane’s pitch angle continued to increase, and the stall warning horn sounded. Immediately thereafter, the engine rpm decreased and popping sounds consistent with a rough running engine were noted. A few seconds later the popping noises ceased, and the engine rpm returned to a higher power setting. The pitch angle continued to increase, and the stall warning horn was audible. The airplane banked left in what appeared to be a 70- to 80-degree left bank; it lost altitude and impacted terrain. The NTSB sound spectrum analysis estimated the speed of the engine to be about 1,900 rpm when the airplane passed over the runway 22 markings. After the sounds of the rough running engine, which lasted about 6 seconds, the engine speed increased to about 2,100 rpm about 9 seconds before impact, which gradually decreased to 1,700 rpm at impact. The Sharp Country Airport is a non-towered airport. It does not have an Automated Weather Observing System but does have a wind indicator located on the field. The closest aviation weather station is located 32 nautical miles away and at 1656 reported a wind from 290° at 16 knots. The 80-hour pilot reported that, while attempting to land in gusty wind conditions, the wind suddenly became “super gusty” as the airplane flew over the runway numbers. The pilot performed a go-around; however, when he added throttle, the engine lost all power and due to the low altitude, he was unable to perform an engine restart. He performed a forced landing near the runway but lost control of the airplane and impacted terrain. The engine was examined, and no anomalies were detected. The left magneto could not be tested due to being waterlogged due to outside storage of the engine before the examination. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) sound spectrum analysis determined that the engine was operating around 1,700 rpm at the time of impact. The airplane’s EDM-900 was downloaded, and the information plotted. The data was not time coded but did show a sharp reduction of horsepower, exhaust gas temperatures, fuel flow, and RPM, that restored briefly before dropping off, likely due to the accident. The video recovered from the accident airplane showed the airplane approaching the runway; after crossing the runway threshold, the airplane floated. There was a slight increase in engine power, and the stall warning horn sounded briefly. The airplane continued to float, and the nose of the airplane pitched up and the stall warning horn was briefly heard again. As the pitch angle continued to increase, the stall warning horn was heard. The engine rpm decreased and popping sounds consistent with a rough running engine were noted. A few seconds later the popping noises ceased, and the engine rpm returned to a higher power setting. The pitch angle continued to increase, and the stall warning was audible. The pilot lost control of the airplane as it entered a stall and impacted terrain. The sound spectrum analysis indicated that the engine ran rough for about 6 seconds, and then the engine rpm was heard increasing to about 2,100 rpm about 9 seconds before it gradually decreased to 1,700 rpm at impact. The reason for the partial loss of engine power could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-(general)-Not attained/maintained
- — Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Experience/qualifications-Total experience-Pilot
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_CEN22LA152.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…