NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CHI00IA152
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The blocked drain lines in the canted pressure deck and the frozen aileron cable.
Factual narrative
On June 7, 2000, at 1236 central daylight time (cdt), a Boeing 767-222, N603UA, operated by United Airlines, Inc., experienced aileron control difficulties while in cruise flight at flight level (FL) 390. The flight diverted to the O'Hare International Airport, Chicago, Illinois where an uneventful landing was made. There were no injuries reported to the 154 passengers, 9 cabin attendants, or 2 flight crew members. The 14 CFR Part 121 flight was operating on an instrument flight rules flight plan. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the O'Hare International Airport at the time of the event. The flight originated from the John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), New York, New York at 1030 cdt, and the San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, California, was the intended destination. The captain reported, in a written statement, that while in cruise flight at FL 390, with the center autopilot engaged with lateral navigation (LNAV), vertical navigation (VNAV) and autothrottles engaged, "...the center autopilot made an uncommanded disconnect." According to the captain, the engine indicating and crew alerting system (EICAS) autopilot disconnect message illuminated and the aircraft master caution was cancelled. The captain said that autopilot disconnect warning light and aural warning activated and were subsequently cancelled. The captain said that he took control of the aircraft and found that the rudder and elevator systems appeared to be functioning normally but "...the control wheel was jammed in the straight and level position." The captain said that approximately 15 pounds of force was applied in order to free the control wheel. The captain said that the autopilot and autothrottles were not engaged for the remainder of the flight, an emergency was declared, and the flight diverted to O'Hare where an uneventful landing was made. A postaccident examination was conducted and several components of the autopilot system were examined. No anomalies were found that could be attributed to the aileron control anomaly. Further examination of the aircraft revealed that the wheel well canted pressure deck drain lines were obstructed by debris. A Boeing service bulletin was found that recommends changes to the drain system. Boeing service bulletin 767-51A0020 states that, "Incorporation of this service bulletin will help ensure that fluid entering the canted pressure deck area will be drained out of the airplane and not leak into the wheel well area where it could freeze on the aileron control cables or the landing gear doors during flight." The service bulletin also states that, "Three operators reported instances of ice accumulating on the aileron cables. In two of the instances, the ice on the aileron cables caused the control wheel not to move when on autopilot. The autopilot was disengaged and the pilot had to operate the aileron system manually. Higher than normal control wheel input force was required to free the cables and restore normal aileron control. The ice-build up on the aileron control cables was attributed to fluid from the sloping pressure deck leaking into the wheel well and freezing." It was determined that the Boeing service bulletin had not been complied with on this aircraft. According to United Airlines records, the aircraft arrived at JFK on June 6, 2000 at 1956 eastern daylight time. Weather reports for the JFK airport show rain during the night of June 6, 2000 and during the morning of June 7, 2000. Parties to the investigation were the Federal Aviation Administration, United Airlines, Rockwell Collins, and Boeing. The captain said that while in cruise flight, "...the center autopilot made an uncommanded disconnect." He said that he took control of the aircraft and found that the rudder and elevator systems appeared to be functioning normally but "...the control wheel was jammed in the straight and level position." He said that approximately 15 pounds of force was applied in order to free the control wheel. The flight was diverted and an uneventful landing was made. A postaccident examination revealed that the wheel well canted pressure deck drain lines were obstructed by debris. A Boeing service bulletin was found that recommends changes to the drain system to "...help ensure that fluid entering the canted pressure deck area will be drained out of the airplane and not leak into the wheel well area where it could freeze on the aileron control cables..." The aircraft arrived at JFK on June 6, 2000 at 1956 eastern daylight time. Weather reports for the JFK airport show rain during the night of June 6, 2000 and during the morning of June 7, 2000. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2000_CHI00IA152.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (autopilot). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
ROSflight 2.0: Lean ROS 2-Based Autopilot for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
ROSflight is a lean, open-source autopilot ecosystem for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Designed by researchers for researchers, it is built to lower the barrier to entry to UAV research and acceler…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
ROSplane 2.0: A Fixed-Wing Autopilot for Research
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) research requires the integration of cutting-edge technology into existing autopilot frameworks.
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
A Data-Driven Autopilot for Fixed-Wing Aircraft Based on Model Predictive Control
Autopilots for fixed-wing aircraft are typically designed based on linearized aerodynamic models consisting of stability and control derivatives obtained from wind-tunnel testing.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Experimental Flight Testing of a Fault-Tolerant Adaptive Autopilot for Fixed-Wing Aircraft
This paper presents an adaptive autopilot for fixed-wing aircraft and compares its performance with a fixed-gain autopilot.
- arXiv 2021 · arXiv preprint
An Adaptive Digital Autopilot for Fixed-Wing Aircraft with Actuator Faults
This paper develops an adaptive digital autopilot for a fixed-wing aircraft and compares its performance with a fixed-gain autopilot.
- arXiv 2020 · arXiv preprint
Reinforcement Learning for Robust Missile Autopilot Design
Designing missiles' autopilot controllers has been a complex task, given the extensive flight envelope and the nonlinear flight dynamics.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗