NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CHI95LA188
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
an in-flight encounter with turbulence.
Factual narrative
On June 20, 1995, about 1810 central daylight time, a Boeing 767- 222, N600UA, operated by United Airlines as United Airlines Flight 9, experienced severe air turbulence approximately ten miles south of Champagne, Illinois, and lost approximately 900 feet of altitude. The flight crew diverted the flight and made a precautionary landing at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport, St. Louis, Missouri. The airplane sustained no damage. Three flight attendants, of a crew of 11, reported serious injuries. One of 137 passengers, who had been seated but had not had her seat belt fastened, reported serious injuries. The scheduled domestic passenger flight operated under 14 CFR Part 121. The flight originated from Kennedy International Airport, New York, New York, at 1625 eastern daylight time with a planned destination of the San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, California. An IFR flight plan was filed, and instrument meteorological conditions (IMC)existed along the route of flight. According to the captain's written statement, he was deviating the flight from its planned course line to avoid thunderstorm activity. The captain stated he observed on radar an opening between two cells of approximately 45 miles. He stated that a route between these cells would allow their flight to return back to its course. While vectoring between these two cells in IMC, the airplane momentarily entered into visual meteorological conditions (VMC) and the captain and first officer saw a cumulus nimbus buildup directly ahead of their path. The captain stated that this buildup had not been displayed on their radar despite use of various ranges and tilts. He stated that the buildup was too close to avoid. The captain immediately made an announcement over the PA for the flight attendants, who were in the process of serving the cabin, to be seated. But he stated that there was not enough time for the flight attendants to react before the airplane penetrated the top of the cumulus buildup. The captain reported they encountered ten seconds of severe turbulence and lost approximately 900 feet of altitude. The airplane was level at flight level 390 approximately 120 miles northeast of St. Louis, at the time of the turbulence encounter. The flight diverted to St. Louis International Airport for medical care for the injured flight attendants and passenger. The airplane landed without further incident. The first officer described the flight up until the turbulence encounter as smooth to light chop. He stated that the seat belt sign for the passengers had been turned on for approximately eight to ten minutes prior to cell penetration. The nine flight attendants described the flight up until the encounter as normal and smooth. Two of the nine flight attendants also mentioned light chop. During a telephone interview, the first flight attendant stated that the captain did give a preflight briefing and it was normal. She did not recall anything mentioned out of the ordinary, nor any mention of bad weather. Convective Sigmet 39C was issued at 2255 Zulu and was in effect for an area that included the approximate location of the turbulence encounter. Convective Sigmet 39C indicated an area of severe thunderstorms moving from 040 degrees at 15 knots with tops above 45,000 feet. It also indicated hail to one inch and possible wind gusts to 50 knots. The Enroute Terminal Forecast for Indianapolis at 1800 central daylight time indicated a chance of four miles visibility, thunderstorms, and light rain showers. The captain was not able to recall Convective Sigmet 39C being broadcasted. The first officer stated that it had not been broadcasted. An inquiry was made to the FAA concerning the time in which 39C was broadcasted. The FAA indicated that a transcript was prepared which covered the time frame of five minutes before the incident until five minutes after the incident. The FAA stated that in reviewing the transcript, it was not possible to determine when 39C was broadcasted from the existing data. While vectoring between two thunderstorm cells in IMC, the airplane momentarily entered into VMC, and the flightcrew saw a cumulus nimbus buildup directly ahead of their path. The captain stated that this buildup had not been displayed on their radar and the cell was too close to avoid. The captain immediately made an announcement for the flight attendants, who were in the process of serving the cabin, to be seated. He stated that there was not enough time for the flight attendants to react before the airplane penetrated the top of the buildup. The flight experienced ten seconds of severe turbulence and lost approximately 900 feet in altitude. Three of the nine flight attendants were seriously injured. One passenger, who was seated but had not had her seat belt fastened, was also seriously injured. The seat belt sign had been on for approximately eight to ten minutes prior to cell penetration. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1995_CHI95LA188.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (imc, turbulence, thunderstorm). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Examination of Aviation Accidents Associated with Turbulence, Wind Shear and Thunderstorm
The focal point of the study reported here was the definition and examination of turbulence, wind shear and thunderstorm in relation to aviation accidents.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Observations of severe turbulence near thunderstorm tops
Data derived from the flight tapes of two airliners that experienced severe turbulence near thunderstorm tops are used to produce quantitative descriptions of the turbulence and its environment.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Proceedings
Operational evaluation of thunderstorm penetration test flights during project Storm Hazards '80
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is conducting a research project called Storm Hazards '80 in order to study the prediction, detectability and avoidance of the hazards of severe storm…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Reprint (Version printed in journal)
Severe Turbulence and Maneuvering from Airline Flight Records
Digital flight records from reported clear-air turbulence incidents are used to determine winds and turbulence, to determine maneuver g loads, and to analyze control problems.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint
Direct Numerical Simulations of Ice-Ocean Boundary Turbulence
Turbulent heat and freshwater transport at ice-ocean interfaces controls glacier and iceberg melt rates, yet the underlying physics remains poorly constrained.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
Political Turbulence and Aviation Safety: A Cross-National Analysis of Political Stability's Effects on Aviation Accidents
To what extent does political stability affect aviation safety? This research aims to link domestic political conditions and public safety through the consideration of aviation accident frequency.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗