CHI96LA256
1996-07-26 · BACKUS, Minnesota, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 7Y3
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's failure to maintain adequate altitude and his abrupt maneuver to avoid the tree tops. The dark night was a factor.
Factual narrative
On July 26, 1996, at 2230 central daylight time (cdt), a Cessna 172M, N1620V, operated by a private pilot, sustained substantial damage when on climb from a go-around, the airplane departed controlled flight and impacted in an oak tree grove near Backus, Minnesota. Visual Meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The personal flight was being conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. No flight plan was on file. The pilot and the passenger on board reported minor injuries. The flight originated at Minneapolis, Minnesota, at 2130 cdt. In his written statement, the pilot said that he was above the glide path on final approach and did not feel comfortable with the situation. The pilot decided to execute a go around. He advanced the throttle to full power and moved the flap switch up two notches from 40 degrees of flaps to 20 degrees of flaps. "Everything seemed to be going fine when the next thing I saw was the tree tops." The pilot "instinctively pulled back on the yoke" to clear the trees. "The airplane dipped to the left," struck the trees and fell to the ground. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector who examined the wreckage at the site, found the airplane resting on its left side amongst oak trees at an 80-degree angle. The left wing had separated from the airplane. The right wing was bent up and aft. Both left and right fuel tanks were broken open. The smell of fuel was prevalent. The cowling and forward fuselage were bent up and to the right. The nose gear had separated from the firewall. The firewall was buckled. The aft fuselage and tail section showed numerous bends and skin wrinkles. The left main landing gear was broken off. The right main landing gear was undamaged. The engine remained attached to its mounts. Both propeller blades were bent and showed chordwise scratching. Flight control continuity was established. No anomalies were found with the engine, engine controls or other airplane systems. The pilot said that he was above the glidepath on final approach and did not feel comfortable with the situation. He decided to execute a go-around. He advanced the throttle to full power and moved the flap switch up two notches from 40 degrees of flaps to 20 degrees of flaps. 'Everything seemed to be going fine when the next thing I saw was the tree tops.' The pilot 'instinctively pulled back on the yoke' to clear the trees. 'The airplane dipped to the left,' struck the trees and fell to the ground. Examination of the wreckage revealed no anomalies with the airplane. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_CHI96LA256.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…