CHI98LA366
1998-09-29 · POINT LOOKOUT, Missouri, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PLK
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's continued flight with a known deficiency in equipment. Contributing to the accident was the maintenance adjustment that was not completed by the mechanic.
Factual narrative
On September 29, 1998, at 1620 central daylight time, a Beech 35, N8946M, piloted by a private pilot, received substantial damage on impact with terrain while returning to Runway 29 (3,730 feet by 100 feet, asphalt/dry) at M. Graham Clark Airport (PLK), Point Lookout, Missouri. The aircraft experienced a partial loss of engine power. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The pilot and passengers reported no injuries. The 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight was not operating on a flight plan. The flight departed PLK, at 1620, and was en route to Slidell, Louisiana. The pilot reported that during his initial departure at 1400, there was a high exhaust gas temperature (EGT) indication. The pilot then returned to PLK where a mechanic looked at the mixture control. The pilot stated that during a second departure attempt, the aircraft would not continue to climb after the gear was retracted at an altitude of approximately 100 feet. He further stated that the engine apparently continued to decrease in power output and that he maintained a low downwind to Runway 29, turned to line up with the runway, and impacted the tarmac. The Airport Operations Manager reported that he saw the aircraft with its landing gear in the down position and that he had heard the engine running very rough. He also noted that the aircraft was banking steeply trying to turn to the centerline of the runway. He further reported that the aircraft's left wing struck the gravel on the south side of the runway, the right main gear broke free and, the nose gear folded up. He added that the aircraft slid towards the centerline of the runway and came to rest approximately 300 feet after its initial impact point which was located approximately 450 feet beyond the threshold of Runway 29. The Airport Manager also stated that the nose of the aircraft was orientated 30 - 40 degrees right of the runway's centerline. The pilot reported that the mechanic, who inspected the mixture control, had replaced the outer mixture control clamps. The pilot also stated that the mechanic recommended to leave the control full rich until a mechanic could troubleshoot the reason that the control linkage allowed the mixture to go over center. The pilot stated that no paperwork was done on the clamp replacement and that the mechanic did not want to charge for the work. The mechanic stated that he was told that the pilot could not shut down the engine with the mixture control, and that the pilot had to use the key. The mechanic stated that he was not told about the attempted departure, or that the pilot had noted a high EGT and had experienced a "partial power loss". The mechanic stated, that he had replaced a cable housing clamp and rigged the mixture control to the full rich stop. He also told the pilot that it was still not rigged correctly and would take a week to troubleshoot and repair. The mechanic further reported, that he showed the discrepancy to the pilot and told him he could do whatever he wanted to do. The mechanic stated that he did not make a logbook entry and did not issue a work order. Inspection of the aircraft by a Federal Aviation Inspector revealed that there was fuel present in both fuel tanks. Both magnetos were tested and no anomalies were noted. Inspection of the mixture control revealed that it was not travelling to the idle cut-off stop and that the full rich stop pin was not in place. The aircraft impacted terrain, while returning to Runway 29 at M. Graham Clark Airport, Point Lookout, Missouri, after experiencing a partial loss of engine power. The pilot reported that the mechanic, who inspected the mixture control, had replaced the outer mixture control clamps. The pilot also stated that the mechanic recommended to leave the control full rich until a mechanic could troubleshoot the reason that the control linkage allowed the mixture to go over center. The pilot stated that no paperwork was generated on the clamp replacement and that the mechanic did not want to charge for the work. The mechanic stated, that he had replaced a cable housing clamp and rigged the mixture control to the full rich stop. He also told the pilot that it was still not rigged correctly and would take a week to troubleshoot and repair. The mechanic further reported, that he showed the discrepancy to the pilot and told him he could do whatever he wanted to do. Inspection of the aircraft revealed that there was fuel present in both fuel tanks. Both magnetos were tested and no anomalies were noted. Inspection of the mixture control revealed that it was not travelling to the idle cut-off stop and that the full rich stop pin was not in place. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_CHI98LA366.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…