CHI99LA027
1998-11-13 · MONTICELLO, Indiana, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KMCX
N5213B has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (AEROSTAR INTERNATIONAL INC S57H, built 2004), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
low altitude stall and an ostentatious display by the pilot. Factors associated with this accident were the performance of a low altitude maneuver and an abrupt pullup by the pilot.
Factual narrative
On November 13, 1998, at 0900 eastern standard time (est), a Cessna 152, N5213B, piloted by a commercial pilot, was destroyed during a collision with trees and terrain following a loss of control during its initial climb from takeoff on runway 18 (4,002' X 60' dry asphalt) at the White County Airport, Monticello, Indiana. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The 14 CFR Part 91 instructional flight was not operating on a flight plan. The pilot was seriously injured and the student pilot received minor injuries. The flight departed Monticello, Indiana, at 0900 est. The instructor pilot (pilot) said he took control of the airplane after the student pilot made a touch and go landing. He said he "...began a demonstration of a short field takeoff from a soft surface... ." The pilot said he "...reset the flap position, applied full power and added back-pressure. I leveled the airplane in ground effect, accelerated to a safe airspeed to bring up the flaps." The pilot said he pitched up to establish the airplane's best rate of climb airspeed. Once he had established the best rate of a climb the pilot said he applied further back-pressure to attain the airplane's best angle of climb speed. According to the pilot's written statement, the "...aircraft decelerated... when the controls became mushy and slow to respond. Sensing an impending stall condition... the nose was lowered." The pilot continues, "The right wing began to drop and the airspeed did not increase as expected despite all efforts." The airplane descended into the trees and ground. The student pilot (student)said that the pilot had told him that "...his friend was at the airport." He said the pilot took control of that airplane and began the takeoff. He said, "He used the entire runway to takeoff and flew the aircraft at a low altitude (3-5 feet above the ground) for a while. Suddenly he pulled the control yoke (I think the pitch was around 60-degrees at that time, but I'm not sure)." The student said the airplane reached "...almost 1,000 feet and I was aware that he had lost control. Because his face turned blue and the aircraft started to descend and turn to the right slowly." Witnesses reported hearing the pilot talking to another pilot whose airplane was taxiing for takeoff on the same runway as N5213B was departing from. One witness reported hearing an occupant of N5213B tell the pilot of the taxiing airplane, "Watch this takeoff." This statement was confirmed by 2 other witnesses. The witnesses said the airplane stayed in ground effect beyond the runway's departure end and pitched up at a steep angle of attack. They reported the airplane banked right and pitched down, eventually descending into the trees near the airport boundary. Another witness said "...there was radio communication between the plane that crashed and another from Perdue U. The Cessna 152 landed, 18 [and] shortly after, the erdue pilot... commented on the landing... . The pilot in the 152 said, 'Yeah watch this takeoff.' At that point he was about midfield at a dead stop." The on-scene investigation revealed no airframe, control system or power plant anomalies that would prevent flight. Both fuel tanks had an undetermined amount of what appeared to be 100 LL AVGAS in them. The fuel gascolator bowl had fuel in it. No water was observed in the bowl and its screen was not contaminated with debris. The cockpit fuel selector was observed in the "ON" position. The flap actuator measurement showed the flaps were in the fully retracted position. According to the Cessna 152 pilot's operating handbook, 10-degrees of flaps extended is recommended for the short and soft field takeoff. An excerpt from the POH is appended to this report. The instructor pilot said he was going to demonstrate a short field takeoff from a soft field. After takeoff he said he pitched the airplane to its best rate of climb attitude. Once attaining the desired airspeed the pilot said he pitched the airplane up to attain its best angle of climb speed. Witnesses reported hearing an occupant in the accident airplane say, 'Watch this takeoff' to a friend who was taxiing another airplane at the accident airport. The accident airplane lifted off the runway and remained in ground effect until passing over the clearway at the runway's departure end. Witnesses said the airplane pitched up steeply, rolled to the right and descended nose first into the trees and ground. The student pilot on the accident airplane said his instructor took the airplane off, leveled it about 3 to 5 feet above the runway and pitched it up to about 60-degrees. He said he heard the stall horn activate and recalled the airplane banking to the right and pitching down. The airplane collided with the trees and ground shortly after beginning its descent. The on-scene investigation revealed no anomalies with the airframe, flight control system or engine that would prevent flight. The wing flaps were in the retracted position. The pilot's operating handbook states that 10-degreees of flaps should be used during the short and soft field takeoff. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_CHI99LA027.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, loss of control). All research papers
- Semantic Scholar 2016 · Article (Interacción) Trajectory Recovery System: Angle of Attack Guidance for Inflight Loss of Control
This paper describes the design and development of an ecological display to aid pilots in the recovery of an In-Flight Loss of Control event due to a Stall (ILOC-S).
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2010 · Accident report Loss of Control on Approach — Colgan Air Flight 3407
Colgan Air 3407 / Continental Connection (Q400) Buffalo NY, February 12, 2009 — 50 fatalities. Definitive investigation of the Colgan 3407 stall-stick-pusher crash on approach to Buffalo.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Loss of Control In-Flight (LOC-I) — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary comprehensive knowledge-base entry on Loss of Control In-Flight — definitions, contributing factors, accident case studies (Air France 447, Colgan 3407), and prevention strategies.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (International Conference on Networking and Services) Risk Assessment of Loss of Control In-Flight Trajectories for Urban Air Mobility Safety
In Urban Air Mobility (UAM), maintaining a minimum separation between aircraft is a safety requirement, which becomes challenging amidst congested air traffic and off-nominal conditions, such as Loss …