NTSB CAROL · Event
Event DCA10FA066
Registry · N27WE
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BOEING B75N1
Year of manufacture
1943 · 67 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR R670-SERIES (225 hp)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19550822
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A2A61C
Registrant of record
HANGAR 39 LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s inadvertent use of the wheel brakes at high speed during the touchdown phase of the landing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s lack of familiarity with the feel and effectiveness of the airplane’s wheel brakes.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On June 8, 2010, at approximately 10:19 eastern daylight time,a Boeing Stearman B75N1, N27WE, nosed over upon landing on runway 1 at Ronald Reagan Washington Airport (DCA), Arlington, VA. The flight was operated as a personal flight under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which operated on a VFR flight rules flight plan. It departed Manassas Regional Airport (HEF) at 0945 eastern daylight time. Neither the pilot nor his passenger were injured. According to the pilot his aircraft was one of eight Stearman airplanes that were to fly together from HEF to DCA to promote a Smithsonian Institution Air and Space Museum motion picture. Each airplane was to carry a passenger from the media to DCA and later, after a ceremony at the museum, back to HEF. The pilot stated that as part of the preflight, he instructed the passenger not to touch the controls. The passenger later stated that the pilot told him to "stay clear of the control stick" and he also pointed out where his "feet should be positioned at all times to stay clear of the control [rudder] pedals." According to the pilot, the eight airplanes approached DCA from the south and his initial clearance from the control tower was to land on runway 33. This clearance was changed to land on runway 1 because of a wind shift. As he entered the flare to land at approximately 70 miles per hour, his plan was to keep the tail of the airplane in the air and roll farther down the runway to allow more room for the following airplanes in his formation. He stated that when the wheels touched the runway he inadvertently applied the toe brakes via the rudder pedals. The airplane flipped over onto the top wing and the vertical stabilizer/rudder. Following the accident both the pilot and the passenger released their seat belts and shoulder harnesses and egressed the airplane.
INJURIES
None.
WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION
The event resulted in damage to the upper wing, the vertical stabilizer and rudder, the engine, and the propeller. The fuel tank was not breached and no fire occurred. The upper wing is composed of three major sections; the center section and left/right outboard wing panels. Each of the three upper wing sections had some crush damage to the leading edges and/or upper surfaces. A flying wire that had connected the center section to the fuselage separated at one end. The vertical stabilizer had been crushed at the top and the rudder was crushed, as well. The cables to the rudder pedals were found intact. The brakes were checked on the runway, after the airplane was turned right side up. The brakes were used during the tow to a hangar. When the wheels were removed in the hangar, the brake drums and shoes appeared to be new. Conversation with the owner/pilot revealed that he typically did not need to use the brakes and that the brake set was about five years old. A skid mark from each tire was found on the runway, 92 feet prior to where the runway showed the first of a set of propeller strike marks. The two tires exhibited reverted rubber.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
The accident airplane, a Stearman B75N1, serial number 75-6651, underwent its last annual inspection on April 1, 2010, and it had accumulated 2388 flight hours at that time. The engine was a 330 horsepower Lycoming R-680-13, and has operated for 998 total hours. Its time since overhaul is 498 hours. The propeller is a controllable pitch Hamilton Standard model 2B20.
SURVIVAL ASPECTS
The pilot occupied the rear seat and the passenger occupied the front seat of this two-seat airplane. Both were wearing 4 point restraint systems which functioned normally.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
The pilot, age 55, held a Class 2 medical certificate with a limitation that he must possess glasses for near vision. The date of his last medical examination was April 22, 2010, and his last flight review was on August 3, 2008. This review was in a Stearman airplane. He has a total flight time of 875 hours with 190 hours in Stearman airplanes. He has flown 20, 8, and 2 hours in the Stearman in the last 90 days, 30 days, and 24 hours respectively, before the accident.
AIRPORT INFORMATION
Runway 1/19 at DCA is 6869 feet long by 150 feet wide and paved with asphalt. It was dry at the time of the accident.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In a post-accident written statement, pilot gave the following reasons for the event: 1. His airplane was equipped with Bendix drum brakes which "grab" when any toe pressure is applied to the rudder pedals. 2. The rudder pedals were in a forward position to accommodate a pilot wearing a parachute. He did not wear a parachute for the accident flight, nor did his seat have a back cushion installed, nor did he readjust the rudder pedals rearward for the accident flight. 3. He wore thick-soled running shoes rather than the thinner-soled shoes he usually wore while flying the accident airplane. 4. He flies formation with his feet off the floorboard and up on the rudder pedals. He believes he did not drop his heels to the floorboards during the landing. This would have lessened the opportunity for inadvertent braking. 5. Due to the nature of the airfields he usually utilizes, he seldom uses the brakes at all during landing, even though he had over 600 landings in the accident airplane. According to the pilot, as he entered the flare to land at an airspeed of about 70 miles per hour, he planned to keep the airplane’s tail in the air and roll farther down the runway to allow more room for the following airplanes in his formation. He stated that, when the wheels touched the runway, he inadvertently applied the wheel brakes via the rudder pedals, which was evident by the skid marks found on the runway. (Pressing forward on the tops of the rudder pedals activates the main wheel brakes.) The pilot’s use of the brakes while touching down at high speed in this type of airplane, which has a high center of gravity and a tail wheel, caused it to flip over onto the top wing and the vertical stabilizer and rudder. Although the pilot had 875 total flight hours, including 190 hours in Stearman airplanes, he stated that he had seldom used the brakes in over 600 landings in the accident airplane. Therefore, the pilot was not familiar with the feel and effectiveness of the airplane’s wheel brakes. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- F Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Experience/qualifications-Total experience w/ equipment-Pilot - F
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Use of equip/system-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_DCA10FA066.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗