DEN03LA017
2002-11-20 · Tooele, Utah, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport TVY
N850FS has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (PIPER PA-28-181, built 2022), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the inadvertent retraction of the landing gear during landing roll by the dual student. Contributing factors included the dual student's lack of familiarity with the aircraft, inadequate supervision by the flight instructor, and improper rigging of the landing gear squat switch.
Factual narrative
On November 20, 2002, approximately 1600 mountain standard time, a Piper PA-28R-201, N850FS, registered to and operated by Salt Lake Community College, Salt Lake City, Utah, was substantially damaged when it collided with terrain after the landing gear retracted during touch and go landings at Bolinder Field-Tooele Valley Airport, Tooele, Utah. The commercial certificated flight instructor and student pilot were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed for the instructional flight being conducted under Title 14 CFR Part 91. The local flight originated at Salt Lake City International Airport approximately 1445. According to the instructor, the purpose of the flight was to prepare the student for dual cross-country flights and to familiarize him with the Piper PA-28R-201. Prior to this flight, the student pilot had been flying Diamond Alarus, a training type airplane. After departing Salt Lake City International Airport, the airplane flew to a practice area west of Provo, Utah, then proceeded to Tooele, where three touch and go landings were made on runway 17. On the fourth touch and go landing, the student pilot "assertively retracted the gear without warning" instead of the flaps. The right main and nose landing gear retracted and the airplane veered off the right side of the runway. The right wing struck a taxiway light, spinning the airplane around, and the left side of the fuselage struck a taxiway sign. The right wing was wrinkled and there was a gash from the leading edge back to the spar. The prop blade was bent. The left side of the fuselage was also wrinkled and buckled. In his narrative, the instructor wrote, "An article I had read from 'Flight Training' magazine about 'instructor complacency' just 2 days before suddenly came up in the back of my mind. As it did, my right hand was ready at the controls within inches. I became very alert and felt I was ready for anything, even the 'unexpected', …or so I thought! Unfortunately, this is a case of human factors, and I should have been more attuned to that! The flap switch in the Alarus is an electric toggle, which does not look remotely close to the gear switch, but is very close to the same proximity. I believe that as my student relaxed and became more comfortable with the plane (after a few landings under his belt), he slipped into 'Alarus mode' and acted impulsively on what he's used to." Commenting on how the accident could have been prevented the instructor wrote, "Hindsight is painfully 20/20, but what I've adopted to my flight training/instruction is this: "Students (privates, commercial, instrument, etc.) Never touch the gear/flap switch without my confirmation: on takeoff, it's verbally, 'No more useable runway, positive rate, brakes tapped, gear up' (confirmation), then retract. Touch-and-goes, 'flaps up (confirmation), then retract, carb heat in, full power.' The callouts have always been the same, confirm, new. "No more touch-and-goes in complex [airplanes] with pilots new to the aircraft. "No more student pilots flying complex airplanes, unless very far along in training and have a thorough knowledge of human factors and we've discussed beforehand." Three FAA inspectors examined the airplane after it had been retrieved and transported to a storage facility. They found that the squat switch on the landing gear had been rigged incorrectly. The lead inspector wrote, "With the aircraft on jacks and weight off wheels, a measurement was taken between the top of the gear fork and the bottom of the gear housing of the Left Main Landing Gear (LMLG) strut at maximum extension. That dimension was measured and confirmed to be 8.125 inches. A multimeter was then attached to the contacts of the Squat Switch, and the Squat Switch contacts were confirmed closed (electrical continuity established). The strut was then compressed slowly until the contacts of the Squat Switch opened (switch actuated-electrical discontinuity). That process was accomplished twice, producing the same measurement of 7.5 inches between the top of the gear fork and the bottom of the gear housing as the point of switch actuation. "The Piper Arrow III -- Turbo Arrow III -- Arrow Service Manual, PA-28R-201/201T, Part Number 761-639, Paragraph 7-37 [ADJUSTEMENT OF LANDING GEAR SAFETY SWITCH (SQUAT SWITCH)], Paragraph c. states: 'Extend and then compress the strut to ascertain that the switch will actuate within the last quarter of an inch of oleo extension.' The results of our inspection placed the switch actuation at .625 inches, exceeding the Service Manual requirement by .375 inches or 150%. "Examination of the aircraft Airframe Log Book revealed no maintenance record entries involving the Squat Switch. The torque seal on the squat switch mounting screws showed no signs of being disturbed." According to the instructor, the purpose of the flight was to prepare the student for dual cross-country flights and to familiarize him with the Piper PA-28R-201. Prior to this flight, the student pilot had been flying a Diamond Alarus, a training type airplane. They flew to a nearby airport, where they made three touch and go landings. On the fourth touch and go landing, the student pilot "assertively retracted the gear without warning" instead of the flaps. The right main and nose landing gear retracted and the airplane veered off the right side of the runway. The right wing struck a taxiway light, spinning the airplane around, and the left side of the fuselage struck a taxiway sign. The right wing was wrinkled and there was a gash from the leading edge back to the spar. The prop blade was bent. The left side of the fuselage was also wrinkled and buckled. According to FAA inspectors who examined the airplane, the squat switch on the landing gear had been rigged incorrectly. The squat switch actuated at .625 inches, exceeding the airplane's service manual requirement by .375 inches, or 150 percent. There were no entries in the maintenance records entries involving the squat switch. The torque seal on the squat switch mounting screws showed no signs of being disturbed. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_DEN03LA017.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance, human factors). All research papers
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper Change Fatigue in Aviation Maintenance through a Human Factors Lens
Aviation is a demanding and fast-paced industry and it is not uncommon for aviation professionals, including maintainers, to experience rapid disruption and organizational change.
- Semantic Scholar 2023 · Article (AHFE International) Managing fatigue in aviation maintenance while promoting a human factors safety reporting system; a strategic approach to aviation safety
The potential rise of fatigue in commercial aviation maintenance due to Aviation Maintenance Technician (AMT) personnel shortages supports a Human Factors (HF) Fatigue Risk Management (FRM) System be …
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology) Impact of human factors in aircraft accident mitigation and aircraft maintenance training needs in post COVID-19 aviation
Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of human factor training in aircraft maintenance accident mitigation and aircraft safety in post COVID-19 aviation scenarios.
- Semantic Scholar 2020 · Article (Collegiate Aviation Review International) From Classroom to Industry: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Decision-Making
The presence of human factors in aviation remains a critical area of research given the safety implications of human error.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Abstract Identifying Human Factors Issues in Aircraft Maintenance Operations
Maintenance operations incidents submitted to the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) between 1986-1992 were systematically analyzed in order to identify issues relevant to human factors and crew …