NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA10LA127
Registry · N3995J
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA 150G
Year of manufacture
1966 · 44 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR 0-200 SERIES (100 hp)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19661015
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A4A748
Registrant of record
WOODSTOCK AIR LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion caused by the failure of the right wing fuel tank sending unit gasket, which resulted in a forced landing.
Factual narrative
On February 1, 2010, at 1331 eastern standard time, a Cessna 150G, N3995J, was substantially damaged during a forced landing in St. Augustine, Florida. The certificated commercial pilot was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. No flight plan had been filed for the flight, between Georgetown County Airport (GGE), Georgetown, South Carolina, and Flagler County Airport (XFL), Palm Coast, Florida. The personal flight was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. According to a Federal Aviation Administration inspector, the airplane "ran out of fuel" and forced landed about 600 yards from St. Augustine Airport (SGJ), St. Augustine, Florida, and by the time he arrived at the scene, it had already been moved. The inspector further noted that he interviewed the pilot, who stated that while he was on approach for the airport, the engine “stopped,” and he landed on a highway. He avoided vehicles on the road, but the airplane hit a few traffic signs and came to rest in a ditch. According to the pilot, he departed GGE at 1115, en route to XFL, 260 nautical miles away, and climbed the airplane to 6,500 feet. Skies were clear, winds were from 250 to 270 degrees at 10 to 12 knots, and the outside air temperature was 19 degrees F. The pilot leaned the engine to 2,525 rpm a for a fuel burn of 7.5 gallons per hour. Working with Jacksonville Center, the pilot descended the airplane to 4,500 feet, 15 miles south of St. Simon's Island (SSI) Airport, Brunswick, Georgia to avoid clouds. Subsequently, while checking his stopwatch and gauges, the pilot noted, "R. gauge bouncing off of E; left gauge intermittent – decided to land and fuel at SGJ." The pilot began his descent 10 nm from the airport, but the engine lost power 4.4 nm out. He then "pulled electric fuel pump/attempt restart/declared emergency/stated [he] would take Highway 1 if unable to make field." The pilot subsequently force landed on the highway, and maneuvered to avoid traffic. The pilot further stated that during 43 years in aviation, and 21 years of ownership of the accident airplane, he always based fuel consumption on time, altitude and temperature, and monitored it with a stop watch. The pilot also noted that upon postflight inspection, he discovered that the right wing fuel tank sending unit gasket had failed, and observed "blue fuel stains on under-wing, flap, fuselage, causing the loss of about 9.2 gallons of fuel." A review of flight tracking data found on a commercial internet site was consistent with the airplane having landed at GGE sometime after 1007, and a fuel receipt, time-stamped at 1019, indicated the purchase of 20.1 gallons of fuel. Radar tracking reappeared about 90 nautical miles southwest of GGE at 1152, at 4,500 feet, and indicated that the airplane maintained that approximate altitude until 1211. The airplane then climbed to about 6,500 feet until 1220, when it began a descent to, and remained in the vicinity of 4,500 feet until 1249. The airplane subsequently descended to about 2,600 feet, and varied its altitude between 2,900 feet and 2,400 feet until 1321. It then averaged about 2,100 feet until 1328, when it began a final descent. Recorded groundspeed during the level flight portions at 4,500-foot altitude ranged between 99 and 111 knots, but was most consistently in the vicinity of 105 knots. Time-distance calculations indicated a takeoff time of about 1100. The airplane's original Lycoming O-200 engine had been replaced by a Lycoming O-320-E2D engine, which was also installed on Cessna 172I through Cessna 172M models. A review of performance data indicated a Cessna 172I-M maximum rate of climb, at 1,700 pounds gross weight(the pilot reported that the maximum gross weight of the accident airplane was 1,760 pounds), of about 1,000 feet per minute, and a fuel burn from sea level to 5,000 feet of 1.9 gallons. Cessna 172I-M performance charts, at 2,500 feet and 2,525 rpm, at lean mixture, indicated a fuel consumption of 8.0 gallons per hour, and at 4,500 feet and 2,525 rpm, a fuel consumption of 7.5 gallons per hour. The pilot reported that when he refueled at GGE, to full tanks, the airplane had 26 gallons of fuel onboard. The pilot refueled the airplane and departed. While cruising at altitudes varying between 6,500 feet and 2,500 feet above ground level, he noticed that the right fuel gauge was fluctuating around the empty indication and the left fuel gauge was giving intermittent indications. The pilot elected to land at an airport that was en route to his destination. As the airplane approached the airport, the engine experienced a total loss of power due to fuel exhaustion. The pilot made a forced landing to a highway about 600 yards short of the airport and, after maneuvering to avoid traffic, the airplane struck road signs and came to rest in a ditch. The pilot stated that he always based fuel consumption on time, altitude and temperature, and monitored it with a stopwatch. Subsequent fuel consumption calculations indicated that at the rpm setting provided by the pilot, the airplane should have had well in excess of 30 minutes of fuel onboard when the engine ceased operating, about 2.5 hours after takeoff. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed fuel stains under the right under-wing area, flap, and fuselage. The stained was a result of fuel leakage due to a failure of the right wing fuel tank sending unit gasket. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Fuel system-Fuel storage-Damaged/degraded - C
- C Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Misc hardware-(general)-Not specified - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_ERA10LA127.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel exhaustion). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗