ERA12LA016
2011-10-05 · Norfolk, Virginia, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PVG
Current FAA registration · N180RN
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 180J
- Year of manufacture
- 1975 · 36 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR O-470 SERIES (230 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19750210
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A14230
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inability to maintain directional control during takeoff for undetermined reasons. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's delayed decision to abort the takeoff.
Factual narrative
On October 5, 2011, at 1700 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 180J, N180RN, registered to a private owner, departed the left side of the runway and collided with a ditch during takeoff roll at Hampton Roads Executive Airport (PVG), Norfolk, Virginia. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The personal flight was operated under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the airframe. The certificate private pilot was not injured. The flight was originating at the time of the accident. The pilot stated he completed an engine run-up prior to taxiing into position on the runway. As he started to taxi onto the runway, he noticed the airplane was hard to turn. He thought the tail wheel had not locked into position and continued the turn. He lined up on the center line of the runway, pulling forward to give the tail wheel time to lock into position. He then applied full power to initiate the takeoff roll. He lifted the tail up as the airspeed increased and the airplane pulled to the left. He thought the left brake was dragging, and told himself, "get off the brakes," and realized his foot was not on the brakes. He attempted to straighten the nose out with rudder, but the left main landing gear went off the left side of the runway. He immediately applied brakes and reduced power. The airplane turned 90- degrees off the left side of the runway and was heading towards a ditch. The airplane collided with the ditch before he could stop. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, both brakes appeared to be in good condition, and free to turn. The brakes pads had been replaced during the last annual inspection on December 3, 2010, and had accumulated 36 hours since installation. The brake hydraulic system could not be checked by the FAA due to the brake hydraulic system being breached after the right main landing gear separated. Further examination of the brake system by a mechanic, at an authorized FAA repair station, revealed mud was packed around the axle, brake disc, and cylinder. The mud and debris was removed and the wheel was free to move with a slight drag. No anomalies were noted with the brake wheel cylinder guide pins. The repair station stated in a subsequent email, “Attached please find a photo of the nut and washer that presumably came from the right main gear bolt on N180RN. Obviously it was not attached as the threads are dirty which would be consistent with a nut that was not attached to a bolt. This nut and washer were found in the belly/gearbox area”. The pilot stated that, as he started to taxi onto the runway, the airplane was difficult to turn. He thought that the tailwheel had not locked into position so he lined up on the center line of the runway and pulled forward to give the tailwheel time to lock into position. He then initiated the takeoff roll and lifted the tail as the airspeed increased. The airplane then pulled to the left, and the pilot applied right rudder, but the left main landing gear went off the left side of the runway. He immediately applied the brakes and reduced power to abort the takeoff; however, the airplane turned 90 degrees, struck a ditch, and the right main landing gear separated from the airplane. A postaccident examination of the brake system revealed no anomalies; however, the brakes could not be tested because the hydraulic system was breached. A nut was found separated from a right main landing gear attach bolt after the accident, but the investigation was unable to determine if the separated nut contributed to the airplane veering to the left during takeoff. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Directional control-Attain/maintain not possible - C
- F Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Delayed action-Pilot - F
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_ERA12LA016.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…