ERA13LA429
2013-09-22 · Rhinebeck, New York, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport NY94
Current FAA registration · N9410
- Make / Model
- DEHAVILLAND TIGER MOTH DH 82A
- Year of manufacture
- 1940 · 73 years old at event
- Engine
- DEHAV ENG GIPSY MAJOR (140 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19700410
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AD1337
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined because postaccident examinations revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation, which resulted in a forced landing into trees.
Factual narrative
On September 22, 2013, about 1430 eastern daylight time, a De Havilland DH 82A, N9410, registered to and operated by a private individual, collided with trees during a forced landing at Old Rhinebeck Airport (NY94), Rhinebeck, New York. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight was filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 personal, local flight from NY94. The airplane sustained substantial damage and the commercial pilot, the sole occupant was not injured. The flight originated about 1 minute earlier from NY94. The pilot stated that before departure he performed a preflight inspection of the airplane which included checking the fuel tank and fuel strainer for contaminants; none were found. Before takeoff, he performed a magneto check twice; the first time was at idle and the second was at 1,500 rpm, no discrepancies were reported. With the wind from the north, he elected to depart to the north applying full power (the engine rpm indicated full power). At the departure end of the runway at 400 feet above ground level, he throttled back to between 1,300 and 1,400 rpm, and about 1 minute later with the mixture control full rich, the engine began backfiring with, "a couple of pops" then backfired hard and quit. The engine resumed operation a couple seconds later. He reported at the first sign of an engine issue he turned to return, and 2 more times heard a loud bang from the engine which quit. He reported that witnesses on the ground could hear the backfiring. After clearing trees he slipped the airplane to lose altitude for a downwind landing on the southerly oriented down sloping runway, and realized that he was running out of runway. With a road past the end of the runway, he intentionally directed the airplane to the left and collided with small trees which damaged both of the wings and also damaged the engine mount. Examination of the engine was performed by an airframe and powerplant mechanic with inspection authorization (IA) with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) oversight. The engine was started briefly but a sustained engine run to full power could not be performed due to the damaged engine mount. Inspection of the air induction, ignition system, and fuel system components revealed no evidence of preimpact failure or malfunction. No determination could be made as to the reason for the reported total loss of engine power. Although the conditions were favorable for serious icing at glide power (or reduced power) based on the temperature and dew point about the time of the accident (64 and 45 degrees, respectively), the pilot reported that the engine developed full power during the takeoff roll. The pilot stated that he performed an engine run-up before takeoff and checked the magnetos twice at different rpm settings and noted no discrepancies. He applied full power during takeoff and noted that the engine was developing full power. At the departure end of the runway and after the pilot had reduced power, the engine began to backfire and lose power. He immediately turned the airplane for a downwind landing on the runway, and the engine quit. After the airplane cleared trees, he slipped the airplane to lose altitude but realized that he was running out of available runway. He then intentionally maneuvered left and collided with trees. The engine was run briefly postaccident, and no discrepancies were noted. A prolonged engine run at full power could not be performed due to damage to the engine mount. No discrepancies were noted with the air induction, ignition, or fuel system. Although the weather conditions were favorable for serious icing at glide power, the pilot reported that the engine developed full power during the takeoff, so it is unlikely that carburetor icing caused the loss of engine power. The reason for the total loss of engine power could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
- — Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-(general)-Contributed to outcome
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2013_ERA13LA429.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…