ERA16LA116
2016-02-27 · Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport W05
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A partial loss of engine power during initial climb for undetermined reasons because examination of the engine and a successful test-run did not reveal any anomalies that would preclude normal operation.
Factual narrative
On February 27, 2016, about 1215 eastern standard time, a Cessna 150L, N976HB, owned and operated by a private individual, was substantially damaged during a forced landing after takeoff from Gettysburg Regional Airport (W05), Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The private pilot was not injured. The personal flight was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the planned flight to Clearview Airpark (2W2), Westminster, Maryland.The pilot stated that he planned the short flight to purchase fuel. The airplane departed runway 24 with 7 gallons of fuel. During initial climb, about 750 feet above ground level, the engine rpm decreased from full power to 1,700 rpm. The pilot applied carburetor heat, but the engine rpm remained at 1,700 and he was unable to maintain altitude. He then turned back toward the airport and realized that the airplane was not going to reach the runway. The pilot subsequently attempted to land in a field prior to the runway, but the airplane impacted and came to rest in trees just prior to the field. The two-seat, high-wing, fixed tricycle-gear airplane, serial number 15074983, was manufactured in 1975. It was powered by a Continental Motors, O-200, 100-horsepower engine. The airplane's most recent annual inspection was completed on October 12, 2015. At that time, the airplane had accumulated 4,342.5 total hours of operation. The engine had also accumulated 4,342.5 total hours of operation; of which, 1,255.7 hours were since its last major overhaul. The airplane had flown about 14 hours since the annual inspection. The airplane's fuel system consisted of two 13-gallon fuel tanks, one in each wing, for a total capacity of 26 gallons; of which, 3.5 gallons were unusable. Examination of the wreckage by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that during the collision with trees, the right wing and empennage partially separated. The inspector also noted that the airplane's left fuel tank cap remained on the runway; however, recovery personnel drained approximately 2 gallons from each fuel tank. The recovery personnel did not observe contamination in the fuel. Additionally, they reported that more fuel may have leaked from the airplane through the vents or left fuel tank opening, as the airplane was suspended nose-down, slightly beyond the vertical position. The engine was subsequently successfully test-run at a recovery facility under the supervision of an FAA inspector. During preparation for the test run, examination revealed that the air inlet filter, gascolator screen and carburetor fuel inlet screen were clear and free of obstructions. The engine started normally and engine power was increased to 2,100 rpm without hesitation. Damage sustained to the propeller and engine mounts resulted in vibration and precluded an attempt of full power due to safety concerns. Examination and test-run of the engine did not reveal any preimpact mechanical malfunctions. The engine primer control was observed in the forward position, but not locked; however, examination of the sparkplugs did not reveal a rich or lean mixture. The recorded weather at an airport located about 15 mile east of the accident site, at 1153, included wind variable at 6 knots, visibility 10 miles, few clouds at 4,600 feet, temperature 3 degrees C, and dew point minus 8 degrees C. Review of an FAA Carburetor Icing Chart for the given temperature and dew point revealed that the conditions were outside of the icing envelope. The pilot reported that the airplane had 7 gallons of fuel and that he had planned a short flight to a nearby airport to purchase more fuel. During initial climb, about 750 ft above ground level, the engine experienced a partial loss of power. The pilot applied carburetor heat, but the engine rpm remained at about 1,700, and he was unable to maintain the airplane's altitude. He then turned the airplane back toward the airport and realized that it was not going to reach the runway. The pilot subsequently attempted to land in a field ahead of the runway, but the airplane impacted and came to rest in trees just ahead of the field. The airplane's left wing fuel tank cap was found on the runway; it likely became separated during the takeoff roll. About 2 gallons of fuel was drained from each wing fuel tank after the accident, and more fuel may have leaked out after the accident due to the airplane's position; therefore, it is unlikely that fuel leaked out during the brief flight. The engine was subsequently successfully test-run on the airframe. Review of a carburetor icing chart revealed that the atmospheric conditions at the time of the accident were outside of the icing envelope. Thus, the reason for the loss of engine power could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2016_ERA16LA116.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…