NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA16LA226
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power due to the failure of the engine-driven fuel pump.
Factual narrative
On June 20, 2016, about 1240 eastern daylight time, a Rockwell International 112A, N1299J, impacted trees during a forced landing following a total loss of engine power near Dayton, Tennessee. The private pilot was the only occupant and received serious injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the personal flight. The flight was conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The flight originated from Whiteside County Airport – Jos H Bittorf Field (SQI), Rock Falls, Illinois, with an intended destination of Pickens County Airport (JZP), Jasper, Georgia. In an interview with a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, the pilot stated that while en route, about 5,500 feet mean sea level, he heard a "pop" and the engine lost total power. He unsuccessfully attempted to restart the engine twice, and then he elected to land in a field. During the forced landing, the airplane impacted trees and subsequently the ground, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage, wings, and empennage. A postaccident examination by a FAA Inspector revealed that the wings, rudder, and horizontal stabilizer had separated from the fuselage. The engine remained attached to the fuselage and the propeller remained attached to the engine. Two of the three propeller blades were bent aft and the third blade was bent forward. Furthermore, an odor similar to aviation fuel was noted on scene. According to FAA records, the airplane was issued an airworthiness certificate on 1975, and registered to the corporation in 2003. It was equipped with a Lycoming IO-360-C1D6, a 180-hp, engine. According to the airframe maintenance logbook, the most recent annual inspection was performed on August 5, 2015, at a total time of 3,958.3 hours. At the time of the accident, the airplane had accumulated 4,046.7 total hours. The engine remained attached to the firewall through the engine mounts. It was partially disassembled to facilitate examination. The propeller rotated without anomaly and crankshaft continuity was confirmed to the accessory section of the engine. Compression and suction was confirmed from all cylinders. The interior of each cylinders was examined with no anomalies noted. The fuel servo was partially impact damaged, the fuel servo throttle arm was in the full throttle position, and the servo mixture control arm was in a full rich position. The servo fuel inlet screen was removed and unobstructed. The fuel flow divider remained attached to the engine, no damaged was noted, was disassembled, and the fuel diaphragm was intact with no debris noted. The fuel injector nozzles were removed and were unobstructed. The engine-driven fuel pump remained attached to the engine and was removed for further examination. When the engine-driven fuel pump was placed in a bucket of water and operated by hand, no water was expelled from the outlet port. The engine was equipped with an Aero Accessories engine-driven fuel pump with the Part No. AF-15473. It was manufactured in 2011 and installed on the engine during an overhaul on March 8, 2011. At the time of the accident, it had accumulated 438.6 hours of total time. According to the manufacturer, it was to be overhauled every 12 years or 2,000 hours, whichever came first. The engine-driven fuel pump was further examined at the manufacturing facility under federal oversight. Visual inspection of the exterior revealed that the lower panel that covered the bottom of the pump was impact damaged. The mechanical fuel pump arm exhibited wear in the area that contacted the engine and no anomalies were noted. The engine-driven fuel pump was mounted on a flow test bench, however, it would not flow. Further disassembly revealed that the stamp ring attached to the top of the diaphragm actuator rod of the fuel pump was deformed. In addition, the fiber spacer or washer were not located. As a result of the deformation, where the actuator met the diaphragm lift stem, the engine-driven fuel pump was unable to actuate the diaphragm element and pump fluid. The engine-driven fuel pump was sent to the NTSB Materials Laboratory for further examination. The examination revealed that the actuator fracture was generally circular in orientation, was slanted, and had indications of localized plastic deformation adjacent to the facture surface. The retainer section, that had separated from the stamp ring but remained attached to the actuator, exhibited damage to parts of the fracture surface and was smeared, consistent with post fracture contact with the adjacent components. The undamaged areas exhibited river patterns and chevron marks. In addition, the areas not damaged were examined with a scanning electron microscope, and exhibited dimple rupture, which is consistent with an overstress fracture. The airplane was equipped with a J. P. Instruments EDM-800, which was panel mounted and recorded up to 24 parameters related to engine operations. The unit contained non-volatile memory for data storage of the parameters recorded and calculated. The data extracted included the accident flight starting 09:38:54 and ending 12:51:47 on June 20, 2016. The data indicated that just after 1251, the fuel flow decreased to zero and the EGT and CHT values decreased as well. While en route, about 5,500 ft mean sea level, the private pilot heard a "pop," followed by a total loss of engine power. He unsuccessfully attempted to restart the engine, and then he chose to land in a field. During the forced landing, the airplane impacted trees and the ground, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage, wings, and empennage. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed that the engine-driven fuel pump was nonfunctional. Metallurgical examination of the fuel pump revealed that it had failed internally; however, the reason for the failure could not be determined due to all the observed damage caused by the failure. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Fuel system-Fuel pumps-Failure
- — Environmental issues-Physical environment-Object/animal/substance-Tree(s)-Contributed to outcome
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2016_ERA16LA226.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗