NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA17LA126
Registry · N413LP
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
EUROCOPTER AS 350 B3
Year of manufacture
1999 · 18 years old at event
TCDS
H9EU · AIRBUS HELICOPTERS
Engine
TURBOMECA ARRIEL 1SER (681 hp)
Seats / Engines
6 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19991122
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A4E04D
Registrant of record
CAMAPE SE
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The flight instructor's incorrect manipulations of the twist grip throttle control during a practice autorotation, which resulted in an engine overspeed and subsequent fire.
Factual narrative
On February 21, 2017, about 1015 Atlantic standard time, an Airbus Helicopters (Eurocopter) AS 350 B3, N413LP, operated by the commercial pilot, was substantially damaged during a practice autorotation at Fernando Luis Ribas Dominicci Airport (TJIG), San Juan, Puerto Rico. The flight instructor and commercial pilot were not injured. The instructional flight was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the flight that originated from TJIG about 0900.According to the flight instructor's written statement, he was the pilot-in-command for the flight and the commercial pilot/owner of the helicopter was practicing autorotations. During recovery from the last 180° autorotation, the flight instructor noticed that the engine rpm continued to increase and exceeded limitations, followed by a vibration in the helicopter. He then immediately landed on a grass area near a runway. After the landing, a mechanic told him that the helicopter's engine was on fire. The flight instructor completed the engine fire procedure and exited the helicopter. According to the commercial pilot's written statement, he had completed several training maneuvers and autorotations uneventfully. The flight instructor then asked if he could perform an autorotation and the commercial pilot agreed. During the flare at the end of the autorotation, the commercial pilot heard the engine overrev, followed by an Nr (rotor speed) aural warning, followed by a fire warning light illumination on the instrument panel. After landing, the commercial pilot exited the helicopter with a fire extinguisher and attempted to extinguish an engine fire. Review of airport security video revealed that the helicopter was descending to a grass area adjacent to the runway. About 30 feet above ground level, smoke began emitting from the helicopter and it climbed out of the video frame. It then descended back into the video frame and landed on the grass while smoke continued to emit from the helicopter. Examination of the helicopter by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed that the fire resulted in damage to the engine deck support structure and a portion of the tail rotor drive shaft. A vehicle and engine multifunction display (VEMD), digital engine control unit (DECU), hydromechanical unit (HMU), and assembly valve were retained for examination and data download at the manufacturers' facilities under the supervision of the Bureau d'Enquetes et d'Analyses (BEA) in France. Examination and testing of the HMU and assembly valve did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal engine operation. Review of data downloaded from the VEMD and DECU revealed that during the accident flight, the first failure recorded by both computers was an NG/N1 failure, respectively. The failure was recorded at 1 hour, 13 minutes, 18 seconds (1:13:18) into the 1-hour, 14-minute flight by the VEMD and 1:13:27 by the DECU. The recorded failure indicated that the gas generator rotation speed (N1) reached an out of limit value. At that time, the fuel regulation was in mixed mode as the collective twist grip throttle control was out of the "flight" detent and the pilot was manually controlling the throttle. A second failure was recorded 2 seconds later, which indicated that the free turbine rotation speed (N2) reached an out of limit value. The failure was triggered by the maximum recorded value of 545 rpm, which equated to an Nr of 140%. According to a representative from the engine manufacturer, the engine's freewheeling turbine was designed for its turbine blades to separate at 150% turbine speed. The design was to prevent the turbine disc from separating at a turbine speed of 170%. During his examination of the engine, the representative observed evidence consistent with the turbine blades separating, resulting in an engine fire. The pilot/owner of the turbine helicopter was practicing autorotations with a flight instructor. After completing several autorotations uneventfully, the instructor asked if he could perform one, and the pilot agreed. Near the flare at the end of the maneuver, the pilot heard the engine overrev, followed by an Nr (rotor speed) aural warning, followed by a fire warning light illumination on the instrument panel. After landing, the pilot exited the helicopter with a fire extinguisher and attempted to extinguish an engine fire. Review of data downloaded from a vehicle-engine multifunction display and digital engine control unit revealed that the first failure recorded during the flight indicated that the gas generator rotation speed (N1) reached an out-of-limit value. At that time, the fuel regulation was in mixed mode, as the collective twist grip throttle control was out of the "flight" detent and the pilot was manually controlling the throttle. A second failure was recorded 2 seconds later, which indicated that the free turbine rotation speed (N2) reached an out-of-limit value. The failure was triggered by the maximum recorded value of 545 rpm, which equated to a turbine speed (Nr) of 140%. The engine's freewheeling turbine was designed to separate turbine blades at 150% Nr in order to prevent the turbine disc separating at 170% Nr. It is likely that the flight instructor excessively opened the fuel metering unit via the twist grip throttle manual control, which resulted in an engine overspeed, turbine blade separation, and subsequent engine fire. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine fuel and control-Fuel controlling system-Incorrect use/operation - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Instructor/check pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2017_ERA17LA126.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…
- NASA NTRS 2024 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – Oct 2024
This presentation provides a status update on select NASA icing research activities for the SAE AC-9C Icing Technical Committee Meeting on Oct 21, 2024.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗