ERA22LA241
2022-05-21 · Lancaster, Ohio, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LHQ
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The improper installation and subsequent failure of the pushrod O-rings, which resulted in failure of the No. 4 connecting rod due to oil starvation.
Factual narrative
On May 21, 2022, about 1353 eastern daylight time, an Evektor-Aerotechnik Sportstar Plus, N503RK, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Carroll, Ohio. The private pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that his airplane had been sitting for a few months for maintenance. He stated that after a thorough external inspection, he started the engine and let it run to ensure there were no anomalies. After all engine checks were completed, he taxied to the run-up area and prepared for takeoff. After takeoff, the pilot noticed that the engine was not developing full power. He leveled off to regain airspeed and reported the engine gained about 200 rpm. Ge turned north toward the practice area, but the engine once again started to lose power. He then turned back toward the traffic pattern for the runway. While on the downwind leg, the engine “quit,” and the pilot radioed “MAYDAY.” He made a forced landing in a field adjacent to the airport. During the landing flare, the airplane landed hard and the right main and nose landing gear collapsed. Postaccident inspection of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed the right horizontal stabilizer and fuselage were buckled. An examination of the engine revealed that when Nos. 1 through 3 cylinder heads were removed the pushrod O-rings were found installed incorrectly. The O-rings were crushed, partially disintegrated, and O-ring material was found in the bore of the crankcase. The No. 4 cylinder head was removed, and the intake pushrod tube O-ring was extruding from the bore. No breaches were found in the oil or cooling system. The crankshaft would not rotate by hand. The cylinder heads were subsequently removed. The No. 4 connecting rod was separated from the crankshaft. The No. 3 piston displayed scoring and liberated pieces of the pushrod O-rings were obstructing oil ports that fed the No. 4 connecting rod bearing. A review of the maintenance logbooks for the airplane did not reveal any recent engine maintenance that would require the removal of the cylinder heads. It was noted in the maintenance logbooks that the cylinders were removed and reinstalled for repair on August 4, 2013, at a tachometer time of 480 hours. This was 8 years and 10 months and 58.8 tachometer hours prior to the accident. The pilot observed a reduction in engine power shortly after takeoff. While attempting to return to the airport, the engine lost power completely while on the downwind leg of the airport traffic pattern, after which the pilot performed an off-airport landing. The airplane’s fuselage and horizontal stabilizer were substantially damaged during the landing. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed that the pushrod O-rings had been incorrectly installed. This improper installation led to the disintegration of the O-rings, and the resulting debris to blocked the oil ports to the No. 4 connecting rod bearing. The lack of oil to the bearing resulted in the failure of the connecting rod, and the subsequent total loss of engine power. The airplane’s maintenance logbooks did not document any recent engine maintenance that would have required removing the engine’s cylinder heads. The cylinders were removed and reinstalled following repair nearly 9 years, and about 58 tachometer hours, before the accident. Based on available information, it is likely that the O-rings were improperly installed during this maintenance. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Replacement-Maintenance personnel
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng cyl section-Incorrect service/maintenance
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_ERA22LA241.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.