NTSB CAROL · Event
Event FTW02LA119
Registry · N9321R
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BANGERT LOWELL F CHALLENGER II
Year of manufacture
2007
Engine
ROTAX 503 DCDI (52 hp)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20071011
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S ACEFA2
Registrant of record
OSHER TERRY G
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the total loss of engine power as a result of oil starvation due to a missing oil filler cap, which resulted in a forced landing. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
Factual narrative
On April 11, 2002, at 1818 central daylight time, a Cessna TR182 single-engine airplane, N9321R, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a total loss of engine power near Cypress, Texas. The airplane was registered to Red Bird Flyers Inc., of Wilmington, Delaware, and operated by the pilot. The private pilot, sole occupant of the airplane, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and a flight plan was not filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The local flight originated from the David Wayne Hooks Memorial Airport, Houston, Texas, at 1800. According to the pilot, he did not note any anomalies during the preflight inspection or engine run-up. He stated that he checked the oil level during the preflight inspection, the dipstick indicated 8 quarts, and he did not remove the oil filler cap to add any oil. The purpose of the flight was to perform a check of the airplane's Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range (VOR) navigational unit. The flight departed and had been airborne approximately 15 minutes when the pilot heard a "loud bang," a film of oil covered the windshield, and the engine lost power. Subsequently, a forced landing was executed to a muddy field, and the airplane came to rest upright. The FAA inspector, who examined the airplane at the accident site, reported that the fuselage was buckled, one propeller blade was bent aft 45 degrees, and one propeller blade was undamaged. He confirmed that there was an oil film covering the windshield, and added that the film extended aft along the fuselage. He also reported that there was a hole in the left rear side of the engine crankcase. The Lycoming O-540-L3C5D engine was examined by the NTSB Investigator-In-Charge and a representative from Lycoming Engines. The crankcase contained a hole between the #5 cylinder's intake pushrod outlet and the #4 cylinder's exhaust pushrod outlet. There was also a hole observed between the #5 cylinder's pushrods. It was noted that all of the engine accessories remained attached to the engine. The engine was boroscoped through the two holes in the engine crankcase, and the #4 and #5 connecting rods were observed to be partially separated from the crankshaft and displayed heat distress. The #6 connecting rod was completely separated from the crankshaft and displayed heat distress. The engine was removed from the airframe firewall and no loose fittings or compromised oil lines were noted during the removal. The inlet and outlet lines for the oil cooler and turbocharger were pressurized with 80 psi of air, and no leaks were noted. The oil filter was removed, examined, and metal shavings were present; however, the shavings did not completely obstruct the filter. The oil pump was removed and all of its internal components were intact; however, galling was observed on the pump's internal housing and on the gear teeth. The oil suction screen was removed and metal shavings were present; however, they did not completely obstruct the screen. The oil sump contained approximately 1 quart of oil and metal fragments. The oil filler cap was not located during the examination. The airplane's maintenance logbooks were reviewed. On August 25, 2001, the airframe and engine underwent their last annual and 100 hour inspection, respectively. On February 21, 2002, the engine underwent its last oil and filter change, and had accumulated a total of 678.9 hours since its last overhaul at a Lycoming facility. At the time of the accident, the airframe had accumulated a total of 2,638.9 hours and the engine had accumulated a total of 714.4 hours since its last overhaul. No record of any open maintenance discrepancies was found. The pilot stated that he checked the oil level during the preflight inspection, the dipstick indicated 8 quarts, and he did not remove the oil filler cap to add any oil. The flight departed and had been airborne approximately 15 minutes when the pilot heard a "loud bang," a film of oil covered the windshield, and the engine lost total power. Subsequently, a forced landing was executed to a muddy field, and the airplane came to rest upright. An FAA inspector reported that there was an oil film covering the windshield, and added that the film extended aft along the fuselage. The Lycoming O-540-L3C5D engine was examined and boroscoped through two holes located on the top side of the engine crankcase. The #4 and #5 connecting rods were observed to be partially separated and the #6 connecting rod was completely separated from the crankshaft. All of the rods displayed signatures consistent with heat distress. The engine was removed from the airframe firewall, and no loose fittings or compromised oil lines were noted during the removal. The inlet and outlet lines for the oil cooler and turbocharger were pressurized with 80 psi of air, and no leaks were noted. The oil filter was removed and examined, and metal shavings were present; however, they did not completely obstruct the filter. The oil pump was removed and all of its internal components were intact; however, galling was observed on the pump's internal housing and on the gear teeth. The oil suction screen was removed and metal shavings were present; however, they did not completely obstruct the screen. The oil sump contained approximately 1 quart of oil and metal fragments. The oil filler cap was not located during the examination. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_FTW02LA119.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Just Culture in Aviation: A Metaphorical Study on Aircraft Maintenance Students
Just Culture, a sub-dimension of safety culture, has been a prominent and debated topic in aviation safety in recent years.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Performance PRISM: A Comprehensive Framework For Performance Measurement In Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft maintenance is governed by rigorous safety requirements and high operational complexity, demanding robust performance measurement frameworks to ensure optimal maintenance practices.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗