NTSB CAROL · Event
Event FTW96LA328
Registry · N210RE
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA P210R
Engine
CONT MOTOR TSIO-520-CE (325 hp)
Seats / Engines
6 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20091217
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A1BAFE
Registrant of record
VALIAIR LC TRUSTEE
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's improper decision to continue the flight after noting the low fuel quantity indication, which resulted in fuel starvation before reaching the airport. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
Factual narrative
On July 20, 1996, at 1610 mountain daylight time, a Cessna T210L, N210RE, registered to and operated by a private owner, received substantial damage during a forced landing following a loss of power near Santa Fe, New Mexico. The commercial pilot, the sole occupant of the airplane, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a flight plan was not filed for the Title 14 CFR Part 91 personal cross country flight. The airplane departed from Dallas, Texas, at 1345 central daylight time. In his written statement, the pilot reported that he "checked both tanks visually, confirmed they were full" prior to departure. After flying on the left tank for 1 hour, and then the right tank for 1 hour, the pilot switched again to the left tank. While on the left tank, the pilot "began to note that the left tank fuel quantity indicator was indicating low fuel quantity." After 45 minutes on the left tank, the pilot switched back to the right tank. "At that point," the airplane "was approximately 8 n. mi. east of Santa Rosa, New Mexico." The Santa Rosa Municipal Airport has a 4,400 foot paved runway and fuel service is available. The pilot stated that he "discounted" the low fuel quantity indication "since I had visually checked both tanks" and "decided to continue on to Santa Fe since I was only approximately 68 n. mi. south east." At a flight time of 3 hours and 25 minutes, while on base leg for landing on runway 20 at Santa Fe, the engine lost power. The pilot was unable to reach the airport and performed a forced landing to a road. The left wing struck a road sign, and the airplane "veered" off the road, traveled down an embankment, and collided with a wire fence. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the airplane and reported the left wing was damaged across the entire leading edge, and the left fuel tank was ruptured. "Just over 1 quart" of fuel was drained from the intact right tank, and the fuel selector was positioned on the right tank. No evidence of fuel leakage was found on the lower or upper wing surfaces, the aircraft belly, or inside the engine compartment. The pilot stated that he "was aware of the fuel quantity indication through out the flight but considered the timed fuel burn more accurate based on training received during checkout in this aircraft and safety reports issued concerning inaccuracies of the fuel quantity indicators." Review of the maintenance records revealed that, on February 16, 1996, a logbook entry was made indicating that the fuel system calibration required by Airworthiness Directive (AD) 94-12-08 was accomplished. Compliance with the AD required that the airplane be defueled and the fuel gauges then checked, and adjusted if necessary, to ensure that they indicated empty. After a cross country flight of 3 hours and 25 minutes, the airplane was on the base leg for landing when the engine lost power. During the ensuing forced landing on a road, the left wing struck a road sign, and the airplane departed the road and collided with a wire fence. About 2 hours and 45 minutes into the flight, the pilot noted that the left fuel quantity indicator was indicating a low fuel quantity. The pilot stated that he discounted the low fuel quantity indication since he had visually confirmed both tanks were full prior to departure, and he elected to continue the flight. The fuel selector was found positioned on the right tank, and 1 quart of fuel was drained from the right tank. The left fuel tank was ruptured; the fuel quantity could not be determined. No evidence of fuel leakage was found on the lower or upper wing surfaces, the aircraft belly, or inside the engine compartment. Six months prior to the accident, the fuel gauges had been calibrated to ensure that they indicated empty when the fuel tanks were empty. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_FTW96LA328.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel starvation, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Just Culture in Aviation: A Metaphorical Study on Aircraft Maintenance Students
Just Culture, a sub-dimension of safety culture, has been a prominent and debated topic in aviation safety in recent years.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Performance PRISM: A Comprehensive Framework For Performance Measurement In Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft maintenance is governed by rigorous safety requirements and high operational complexity, demanding robust performance measurement frameworks to ensure optimal maintenance practices.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗