GAA19CA403
2019-06-26 · Summersville, South Carolina, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport DYB
N500SC has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON CANADA 407, built 2009), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The copilot’s disabling of the flight controls of an operating helicopter without telling the pilot on the controls, which resulted in a subsequent loss of control and collision with terrain.
Factual narrative
The helicopter's pilot, seated in the left seat, reported that he taxied and landed the helicopter on a taxiway after completing a mission with a copilot onboard. After landing, the copilot, seated in the right seat, disembarked with the passenger, to request fuel from the fixed base operation. The copilot returned to the helicopter and without boarding, instructed the pilot to reposition the helicopter to the airport's refueling station because the fuel truck was inoperative. Once the copilot was clear of the helicopter, the pilot brought the helicopter to a hover, but the helicopter began to spin clockwise. He then applied left pedal, but the helicopter continued to spin and climbed about 7 ft above ground level. After two revolutions, the pilot realized that the right seat, left hand anti-torque pedal was "chocked." He immediately initiated an autorotation, but the helicopter's tail rotor and main rotor blades struck the ground. The copilot reported that, after exiting the cockpit, while the pilot had positive control of the flight controls, he "chocked" the pedals on the right side, by removing the left-hand anti-torque pedal, rotated it 180°, and reinstalled it. This action prevents full travel of the left anti-torque pedal on both sides of the cockpit. He did not tell the pilot he had chocked the pedals, and the pilot added that he was not aware that the copilot had "chocked" the pedals. The copilot added that he did not know the reason why he "chocked" the pedals. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to the main rotor system, tail rotor system and tailboom. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the helicopter that would have precluded normal operation. A senior leadership official for the operator reported that "chocking the pedals" is a common, unwritten practice utilized when both pilots exit the helicopter while the engine is running. He added that there was a consensus between both full time and part-time pilots approving the "chocking of pedals", although the action is not approved by the manufacturer. Conversely, the pilot, who is also the unit safety officer, reported that he did not agree with the practice but did not express his concern to management and went along it, adding that the practice and the organizational culture does not reflect a Just Safety Culture. According to a manager, a safety management systems (SMS) manual was created 2 years earlier, but its "Hazard Identification and Analysis" and "Safety Risk Assessment and Mitigation" processes were not utilized to determine the risks associated with "chocking the pedals." The manager added that the SMS program is not properly understood nor utilized by all pilots or management and seen as another program created by upper management to satisfy a requirement. According to the manufacturer, "locking" the pedals while the engine is running, is not an approved procedure (refer to the Operational Safety Notice OSN2019-004 in the docket). The pilot, seated in the left seat, reported that he taxied and landed the helicopter on a taxiway after completing a mission. After landing, the copilot, seated in the right seat, disembarked with the passenger to request fuel from the fixed-base operator. The copilot returned to the helicopter without boarding and instructed the pilot to reposition the helicopter to the airport's refueling station because the fuel truck was inoperative. Once the copilot was clear of the helicopter, the pilot brought the helicopter to a hover, but the helicopter began to spin clockwise. He then applied left pedal, but the helicopter continued to spin and climbed about 7 ft above ground level. The pilot stated that, after two revolutions, he realized that the right-seat, left antitorque pedal was "chocked" and added that he was not aware that the copilot had "chocked" the pedals. He immediately initiated an autorotation, but the helicopter's tail rotor and main rotor blades struck the ground. The copilot reported that, after exiting the cockpit, while the pilot had positive control of the flight controls, he chocked the pedals on the right side by removing the left antitorque pedal, rotating it 180°, and reinstalling it, which prevented full travel of the left antitorque pedal on both sides of the cockpit. He added that he did not tell the pilot he had chocked the pedals and that he did not know why he chocked the pedals. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to the main and tail rotor systems and tailboom. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the helicopter that would have precluded normal operation. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Communication (personnel)-Lack of communication-Copilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft propeller/rotor-Rotorcraft flight control-Tail rotor control system-Incorrect use/operation - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-(general)-Not attained/maintained - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2019_GAA19CA403.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, loss of control). All research papers
- Semantic Scholar 2016 · Article (Interacción) Trajectory Recovery System: Angle of Attack Guidance for Inflight Loss of Control
This paper describes the design and development of an ecological display to aid pilots in the recovery of an In-Flight Loss of Control event due to a Stall (ILOC-S).
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2010 · Accident report Loss of Control on Approach — Colgan Air Flight 3407
Colgan Air 3407 / Continental Connection (Q400) Buffalo NY, February 12, 2009 — 50 fatalities. Definitive investigation of the Colgan 3407 stall-stick-pusher crash on approach to Buffalo.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Loss of Control In-Flight (LOC-I) — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary comprehensive knowledge-base entry on Loss of Control In-Flight — definitions, contributing factors, accident case studies (Air France 447, Colgan 3407), and prevention strategies.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (International Conference on Networking and Services) Risk Assessment of Loss of Control In-Flight Trajectories for Urban Air Mobility Safety
In Urban Air Mobility (UAM), maintaining a minimum separation between aircraft is a safety requirement, which becomes challenging amidst congested air traffic and off-nominal conditions, such as Loss …