NTSB CAROL · Event
Event IAD05LA050
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's improper IFR procedure by flying below the minimum descent altitude, which resulted in the airplane striking trees.
Factual narrative
On April 2, 2005, about 1210 eastern standard time, a Piper PA-31P-350, N134DE, was substantially damaged when it struck trees in Ridgefield, Connecticut, while on an instrument approach to Danbury Municipal Airport (DXR), Danbury, Connecticut. The certificated commercial pilot/owner was not injured. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed, and an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan was filed for the flight that departed East Hampton Airport (HTO), East Hampton, New York. The personal flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to a mechanic, the purpose of the flight was to reposition the airplane to Danbury, Connecticut to replace a propeller de-icing boot. Prior to departing East Hampton, the mechanic advised the pilot that the weather was below landing minimums, and he should not attempt the trip. Radar plot data and air traffic control (ATC) transcripts obtained from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) revealed that the pilot departed East Hampton, New York, on an IFR flight plan, destined for Danbury, Connecticut. After departure, the pilot initially climbed to 4,000 feet msl and proceeded direct to Bridgeport, Connecticut. A while later, the pilot was given radar vectors to the Localizer Runway 8 approach at Danbury. He crossed the final approach fix at approximately 2,200 feet msl and initiated his descent on the localizer where the last radar return during the descent was recorded at 1,200 feet msl. The altitude readout was then lost by ATC and later reacquired during the missed approach. He then climbed up to an altitude of 3,000 feet msl and advised ATC that he had bird strikes on both wings and that it looked like the de-icing boots were damaged. The pilot then asked ATC about weather conditions at the Francis S. Gabreski Airport (FOK), Westhampton Beach, New York; however, the reported weather was below landing minimums. ATC then offered the pilot a choice of two other airports that might be suitable for an instrument approach and landing but he advised them that he would then have to "arrange alternate transportation." He then proceeded to Long Island Mac Arthur Airport (ISP), Islip, New York and flew the instrument landing system (ILS) approach for runway 24. He was unable to land, executed another missed approach, and proceeded to Republic Airport (FRG) Farmingdale, New York where he was able to perform the ILS Runway 14 approach, and land. A statement from a local resident revealed that an airplane had struck trees that were located west of the approach end of runway 08 at the Danbury Municipal Airport. The witness stated that "the scraping sound of branches against metal was audible, and I saw the upper branches of the pine trees waving after contact with the plane." Topographical data for the local area showed that the trees mentioned in the witness's statement were located at a terrain elevation of 599 feet above sea level. The minimum descent altitude for the Localizer Runway 8 approach was published as 1,100 feet, and the Danbury Municipal Airport was located at a field elevation of 458 feet. According to a witness statement, on April 4, 2005, the airplane was flown without a special flight permit from Farmingdale, New York, to Danbury, Connecticut. An airframe and powerplant mechanic advised the pilot that he was unable to repair the airplane in a reasonable amount of time, as the wing skins would require replacement. He suggested that the repair work could be accomplished at two other locations, one of which was in Hagerstown, Maryland. On April 9,2005 the airplane was flown to Hagerstown, Maryland. According to an FAA inspector, on April 21, 2005, while inspecting other airplanes located at the Hagerstown Regional Airport (HGR), Hagerstown, Maryland, his attention was drawn to an airplane that appeared to be substantially damaged. Closer inspection by the inspector revealed the presence of wood imbedded in some of the screw heads, joint overlaps, and inspection plates. He was later informed by a mechanic that the airplane had been flown into the airport without a special flight permit. On May 18, 2005, the airplane was inspected by the Safety Board in Hagerstown, Maryland. The inspection revealed that the airplane had sustained impact damage to both wings, the ailerons, horizontal stabilizers and elevators. The left and right side de-ice boots exhibited scrape marks and tears, the left wing gap fairing was cracked, the left engine exhaust shield exhibited crush marks and the left cowling was wrinkled. The navigation light for the right wing was broken, and numerous antennas were damaged. The recorded weather at the Danbury Municipal Airport, at 1224, included: winds from 080 degrees at 9 knots; visibility 2 1/2 statute miles in light rain and mist; ceiling overcast at 200 feet; temperature 46 degrees Fahrenheit; dew point 46 degrees Fahrenheit; altimeter setting 29.64 inches of mercury. Prior to departing on the accident flight, a mechanic, who was to perform work on the airplane advised the owner/pilot that the weather was below landing minimums and he should not attempt the trip. During a localizer approach at the airport, the airplane impacted trees that were located west of the approach end of the runway. After executing a missed approach the pilot advised ATC that he had bird strikes on both wings and that it looked like the de-icing boots were damaged. A local resident who witnessed the event stated that "the scraping sound of branches against metal was audible, and I saw the upper branches of the pine trees waving after contact with the plane." The trees were located at a terrain elevation of 599 feet above sea level. The minimum descent altitude for the approach was published as 1,100 feet. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_IAD05LA050.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…
- NASA NTRS 2024 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – Oct 2024
This presentation provides a status update on select NASA icing research activities for the SAE AC-9C Icing Technical Committee Meeting on Oct 21, 2024.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗