NTSB CAROL · Event
Event IAD97LA016
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's inadequate preflight, and his failure to detect an insufficent fuel supply, which resulted in fuel exhaustion and a forced landing after takeoff. Uneven terrain (drop-off in the emergency landing area) was a related factor.
Factual narrative
On November 5, 1996, approximately 1700 eastern standard time, a Grumman American AA-1B, N9926L, was substantially damaged during a forced landing after takeoff from the Montgomery County Airpark, Gaithersburg, Maryland. The certificated private pilot/owner and passenger received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot/owner arrived at the airport at 1600 to meet a perspective buyer of the airplane. The pilot stated that he "performed a preflight inspection and other local errands while waiting for the buyer to arrive." When the perspective buyer arrived, approximately 1645, they boarded the airplane, started the engine, and taxied to the runway for a closed-pattern demonstration flight. Runup, takeoff roll and rotation were all normal. The owner stated that at 200 feet the engine suddenly lost power. The owner then initiated a left turn back to the runway. The owner stated that he was unable to make it to the runway, so he attempted to land in a small vacant lot. The airplane impacted the ground, skidded across a raised road, struck trees, and continued down a steep grade where it nosed over. The pilot and passenger exited through the rear window opening. The pilot recalled that the last time he flew and fueled the airplane was in late September, when he returned to Gaithersburg from an airport near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The pilot stated that he thought he had a third of a tank in the left wing, and a half of a tank in the right wing, based on his flights in September. The pilot stated that he removed the caps from each wing during his preflight inspection, but, due to the design of the tanks, he was unable to see any fuel. The airplane's fuel gauges consisted of the sight glass with the float balls, on both sides of the cockpit area. The pilot stated that he could not remember looking at them, and could not recollect what the gauges indicated prior to takeoff. Examination of the wreckage by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Inspector revealed no mechanical problems with the engine or its components. During his inspection of the fuel system, the Inspector found both wing tanks empty, and saw no signs of leakage or spillage. The Inspector removed the main fuel supply lines and found no residual fuel in the system. He operationally checked the fuel drains, and they functioned normally. No verification of the amount of fuel purchased, or the amount of flight time accumulated since the fuel was purchased was provided by the pilot. The pilot last flew the airplane about 45 days before the accident. He stated that he thought the left wing fuel tank was 1/3 full and the right wing fuel tank was half full, based on the fuel he purchased before his previous flight. The pilot stated that he performed a preflight inspection and had removed the fuel caps. He was unable to see fuel due to the design of the tanks. The pilot stated that when a perspective buyer of the airplane arrived, they boarded the airplane and taxied to the runway. The engine runup, takeoff roll, and rotation were normal. At about 200 feet, the engine lost power, and the pilot initiated a left turn back to the runway. The airplane impacted the ground, skidded across a raised road, and continued down a steep grade where it nosed over. The pilot and passenger exited through the rear window openings. The pilot could not recall looking at the fuel sight gauges in the cockpit before takeoff. An FAA inspector found no mechanical problem with the engine, and stated that no fuel could be found in the airplane or at the scene. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_IAD97LA016.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel exhaustion). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- AOPA Air Safety Institute 2023 · Safety advisor
Safety Advisor: Fuel Awareness
AOPA Air Safety Institute safety advisor on preventing fuel-exhaustion and fuel-starvation accidents in general aviation. Covers pre-flight fuel planning, reserve requirements (14 CFR 91.151, 91.167),…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Abstract
U.S. Civil Rotorcraft Accidents, 1963 through 1997
The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has recorded 8,436 rotorcraft accidents during the period mid - 1963 through the end of 1997.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
A study of carburetor/induction system icing in general aviation accidents
An assessment of the frequency and severity of carburetor/induction icing in general-aviation accidents was performed. The available literature and accident data from the National Transportation Safet…
- NASA NTRS 2018 · Other
Parachuting to Safety
NASA's Langley Research Center awarded Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc., three Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) contracts to research and develop a new, low cost, lightweight recovery system …
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗