IAD99LA001
1998-10-02 · MIDDLEFIELD, Ohio, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 7G8
Current FAA registration · N78624
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 172K
- Year of manufacture
- 1968 · 30 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19681126
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AAA98B
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inadequate preflight inspection which resulted in fuel exhaustion.
Factual narrative
On October 2, 1998, about 1411 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 172K, N78624, was substantially damaged as it impacted a tree during a forced landing after takeoff from the Geauga County Airport (7G8), Middlefield, Ohio. The certificated commercial pilot/owner was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The flight originated from 7G8, about 1410. The pilot reported that the prior owner of the airplane flew to 7G8, picked him up, and returned to Ashtabula County Airport (7G2), about 10 minutes away. Once there, the pilot purchased the airplane. After receiving the airplane's logbooks, the pilot departed 7G2, and flew in the local area for about an hour. Upon returning to 7G8, the pilot completed one touch and go, and a full stop landing. While taxiing to his hangar, the pilot decided to perform one more takeoff and landing. The pilot recalled that he was focused on the runway markers and airspeed as he took off. The airplane was "cranked up" (nose up attitude), when the engine lost power between 200 to 300 feet. Past midfield with power lines and a gas station at the end of the runway, the pilot made a left 90 degree turn. Faced with a hangar and parked airplanes, the pilot made a right 45 degree turn to land diagonally on an open field. Once on the ground, the pilot could not stop the airplane prior to hitting a tree. After hitting the tree, the pilot stated that the airplane whipped around and came to rest in a ditch with the empennage sticking into a road. The airplane remained upright and was towed to a hangar. During a telephone interview, the pilot stated that he completed a preflight inspection of the airplane prior to departing 7G2, with both fuel gauges indicating about 1/4 tank. He did not visually check the fuel tanks during his inspection. He reported that during a discussion about the fuel gauges, the previous owner stated that they read low. The new owner understood that to mean there was more fuel in the tanks than what the gauges indicated. The flight back to his airport was bumpy and the gauges were bouncing around. The pilot recalled the gauges reading about an 1/8th, bouncing between E and 1/4. Federal Aviation Administration Inspectors examined the wreckage on October 5, 1998. They stated that the left wing, outboard of the support strut, was broken and folded back, the right wing tip was crushed, and the windscreen was broken. The Inspectors reported that the engine had drive train continuity, and compression was obtained from the cylinders. The spark plugs appeared new, and spark was obtained from the magnetos. The Inspectors stated that the fuel tanks maintained their integrity and they found a total of 1.5 gallons of fuel in both fuel tanks. The Cessna Pilot's Operating Handbook stated that the total unusable fuel onboard with standard fuel tanks was 3 gallons. After purchasing the airplane, the pilot took off without visually checking the fuel level in the tanks. After flying locally and landing at his home airport, the pilot elected to perform one more take off and landing. During the initial climb out, about 300 feet agl, the engine lost power. Past midfield and unable to land on the remaining runway, the pilot made a left 90 degree turn. Faced with an unsuitable landing area, the pilot turned right 45 degrees to land diagonally in a small field. The pilot was unable to stop the airplane prior to impacting a tree with the left wing. Upon examination of the airplane, no mechanical malfunctions were found with the airframe or the engine. A total of 1.5 gallons of fuel was drained from both tanks. The airplane's Pilot's Operating Handbook listed the unusable fuel as 3 gallons. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_IAD99LA001.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel exhaustion). All research papers
- AOPA Air Safety Institute 2023 · Safety advisor Safety Advisor: Fuel Awareness
AOPA Air Safety Institute safety advisor on preventing fuel-exhaustion and fuel-starvation accidents in general aviation. Covers pre-flight fuel planning, reserve requirements (14 CFR 91.151, 91.167),…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Abstract U.S. Civil Rotorcraft Accidents, 1963 through 1997
The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has recorded 8,436 rotorcraft accidents during the period mid - 1963 through the end of 1997.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR) A study of carburetor/induction system icing in general aviation accidents
An assessment of the frequency and severity of carburetor/induction icing in general-aviation accidents was performed. The available literature and accident data from the National Transportation Safet…
- NASA NTRS 2018 · Other Parachuting to Safety
NASA's Langley Research Center awarded Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc., three Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) contracts to research and develop a new, low cost, lightweight recovery system …