NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX02LA102
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
fuel starvation due to the pilot's mismanagement of the fuel system.
Factual narrative
On March 3, 2002, at 1534 Pacific standard time, a Piper PA-28-140, N1775T, experienced a loss of engine power and impacted terrain about 450 yards from the approach end of runway 28L at the Montgomery Field Airport (MYF), San Diego, California. Plus One Flyers was operating the rental airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The commercial pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured; the airplane sustained substantial damage. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local area flight that departed MYF about 1320. No flight plan had been filed. In the pilot's written statement to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), he stated that he arrived at the airport about 1200. He spent about 1.5 hours reviewing the flight manual for the airplane due to his unfamiliarity with the airplane. He then conducted a normal preflight. He departed runway 28L with the left fuel tank selected. He proceeded north along the shoreline towards the Del Mar Raceway (horse track). He then turned inland towards French Valley Airport (F70), Temecula, California. His intent was to practice touch-and-go takeoffs and landings. Prior to arrival at F70, he requested airport advisories. UNICOM reported winds from 130 degrees at 12 knots gusting to 18 knots. He decided not to practice touch-and-go's at F70, and departed the airport on an easterly heading towards Julian VOR. He stated that there was light to moderate turbulence in the area, and he decided to return to MYF. The pilot reported that over Lake Cuyamaca he switched the fuel selector to the right fuel tank for the return leg. The pilot stated that the descent from Lake Cuyamaca, which began at 8,500 feet, was normal. MYF tower personnel instructed the pilot to proceed for a straight-in approach for runway 28L. Reported winds were from 260 degrees at 8 knots. About 1 nm from touchdown, the engine began to lose power. The pilot rechecked that the mixture was rich, and the carburetor heat was on. He contacted the tower and declared an emergency. The pilot stated that he informed the tower that he was going to land on 28R, which has a displaced threshold. Tower personnel cleared him to land on any runway. The pilot reported that there was not sufficient altitude to make the displaced threshold, and he executed a forced landing short of the runway. He stated that the fuel selector was selected to the right fuel tank. He further indicated that the airplane came to rest in a nose down, left wing low attitude. When he visually checked the fuel tanks, he was unable to see any fuel. The airport manager stated that he did not observe fuel leaking out of the airplane, and verified that the fuel selector handle was on the right tank. The FAA inspector, who visually examined the fuel system, noted no leaks or ruptures in the system. The inspector observed fuel in the left wing fuel tank, but not in the right wing fuel tank. He further indicated that the engine was started for a post accident test run on the left tank with no discrepancies noted. The airplane experienced a loss of engine power and impacted terrain about 450 yards from the approach end of the runway. The pilot spent about 1.5 hours reviewing the flight manual for the airplane due to his unfamiliarity with this model. He departed with the left fuel tank selected. He spent about 2 hours flying, and then returned to the departure airport. On his initial descent he switched the fuel selector valve to the right tank. About 1 nm from touchdown, the engine began to lose power. He rechecked that the mixture was rich, and the carburetor heat was on. He contacted the air traffic control tower and declared an emergency. He executed a forced landing short of the runway due to insufficient altitude. The pilot inspected the fuel tanks and observed no fuel in the tanks; however, the airplane was in a nose down, left wing low attitude. An FAA inspector examined the fuel system. He observed fuel in the left tank, but none in the right tank. A post accident engine ground run-up was conducted utilizing the left tank with no discrepancies noted. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_LAX02LA102.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel starvation, turbulence). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint
Direct Numerical Simulations of Ice-Ocean Boundary Turbulence
Turbulent heat and freshwater transport at ice-ocean interfaces controls glacier and iceberg melt rates, yet the underlying physics remains poorly constrained.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
Political Turbulence and Aviation Safety: A Cross-National Analysis of Political Stability's Effects on Aviation Accidents
To what extent does political stability affect aviation safety? This research aims to link domestic political conditions and public safety through the consideration of aviation accident frequency.
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Explainable LiDAR 3D Point Cloud Segmentation and Clustering for Detecting Airplane-Generated Wind Turbulence
Wake vortices - strong, coherent air turbulences created by aircraft - pose a significant risk to aviation safety and therefore require accurate and reliable detection methods.
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
Does small-scale turbulence matter for ice growth in mixed-phase clouds?
Representing the glaciation of mixed-phase clouds in terms of the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process is a challenge for many weather and climate models, which tend to overestimate this process because…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Effects of electrostatic interaction on clustering and collision of bidispersed inertial particles in homogeneous and isotropic turbulence
In sandstorms and thunderclouds, turbulence-induced collisions between solid particles and ice crystals lead to inevitable triboelectrification.
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2023 · SKYbrary article
Wake Vortex Turbulence — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary wake vortex turbulence comprehensive article — generation mechanics, dissipation factors, separation standards (ICAO LIGHT/MEDIUM/HEAVY/SUPER + recategorisation RECAT-EU).
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗