LAX04LA254
2004-07-01 · Scottsdale, Arizona, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KSDL
N513TS has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (CESSNA 650, built 1999), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Inadvertent in-flight engagement of the collective down lock, which resulted in an uncontrolled descent and ground impact. The collective down lock engagement was caused by the improper installation and/or adjustment of the collective locking system, which reduced the clearance between the locking plate and the collective control. A factor was the pilot’s decision to embark on a maintenance test flight after encountering difficulty disengaging the collective lock release during previous hover tests.
Factual narrative
On July 1, 2004, at 1500 mountain standard time, a Eurocopter AS-350-B2, N513TS, collided with terrain 8 miles northwest of Scottsdale Airport, Arizona, while performing a maintenance check flight. Westcor Aviation, Inc., was operating the helicopter under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The commercial pilot and a mechanic crewman received minor injuries, and the helicopter was destroyed. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and a flight plan had not been filed. The maintenance test flight originated at Scottsdale Airport. The pilot reported in the Pilot/Operator Accident Report that they were performing a maintenance flight to check the engine and performing a rotor track and balance. He entered a descent at 2,700 feet mean sea level (msl) (approximately 1200 feet above ground level (agl)), and prepared to level off at 2,200 feet msl (approximately 700 feet agl). When he tried to pull up on the collective, the collective would not move. It was observed by the mechanic-crewman that the collective lock had engaged. He and the crewman tried to unlatch the collective from the down lock, but they did not have enough time before he had to flare the helicopter for landing. With the collective stuck in flat pitch, they landed hard and with forward speed. The flight crew evacuated the helicopter once it had come to rest. An ensuing post accident fire destroyed the helicopter. Examination of the helicopter maintenance logbook revealed that the helicopter's factory avionics console was replaced with a Geneva P132 avionics console on June 7, 2004. On July 1, 2004, the Eurocopter 12-year major inspection was entered as complied with. One of the items entered in the logbook for the major inspection was a check of the collective lock, and the installation of a new collective lock button. The collective lock consists of an aluminum metal button that protrudes from the end of the collective grip and an 8-inch (approximately) sprung steel strap or flexible lock plate is attached to the either the cockpit deck or the avionics console depending on how the helicopter is equipped. The flexible lock plate is aligned in parallel with the vertical travel of the collective end. The flexible plate has a circular hole in the upper end that fits over the protruding collective lock button. The pilot locks the collective down by pushing it slightly past the lower pitch stop and pulling the flexible plate over the collective lock button. The collective is held in place by its natural upward force towards the lower pitch stop position and a groove in the collective button that the flexible lock plate engages. The pilot disengages the lock by pushing down on the collective slightly and the flexible plate springs itself forward away from the collective lock button. When the flexible lock plate is not engaged (i.e., normal flight conditions) it is free to vibrate about its base attachment point with the rhythms of the helicopter. A rubber plug placed in the middle of the flexible plate is meant to dampen out vibrations when in contact with the avionics panel. Section 3.3, adjustment of the "LOW PITCH" lock plate, in the Eurocopter Maintenance Manual, the collective lock is to be adjusted such that when the collective is at the lower pitch stop, with no further downward force on the collective by the pilot, the collective lock button is set 1 mm short of being aligned to engage the flexible lock plate. On the Geneva avionics panel, two setscrews in the base of the plate adjust the flexible lock plate vertically for alignment. The clearance between the collective and the flexible plate when the collective is at the lower pitch stop was measured in an exemplar helicopter with a factory avionics panel installed. The measurement was approximately 0.3 inches between the end of the collective lock button and the flexible lock strap. Geneva provided documents that depicted the clearance between the collective lock button and the flexible lock plate with a Geneva avionics panel installed as 0.16 inches.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
National Transporation Safety Board investigators have identified a second occurrence of an AS350 with the Geneva avionics panel installation where the collective lock engaged in flight, which resulted in an accident. Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin SW-05-20 was issued on December 2, 2004, recommending inspection of the collective lock rigging. While performing a maintenance check flight, the collective down lock engaged, which resulted in an uncontrolled descent and collision with terrain. The pilot and a mechanic were to fly a maintenance flight check of the engine and perform a rotor track and balance. He entered a descent at approximately 1,200 feet above ground level (agl) and prepared to level off at approximately 700 feet agl. When he tried to pull up on the collective, the collective would not move and was observed latched by the collective down lock. He and the mechanic tried to unlatch the collective from the down lock, but they did not have enough time before he had to flare the helicopter for landing. With the collective stuck in flat pitch, they landed hard and with forward speed. The flight crew evacuated the helicopter once it had come to rest. An ensuing post accident fire destroyed the helicopter. A new after market avionics control panel had been installed and the collective down lock, which is secured to the panel, was adjusted prior to the flight. The down lock attaches to the lower section of avionics panel. When the collective is lowered to the lower pitch stop the clearance between the collective and the down lock is about 0.16 inches. The down lock is a flexible plate that is free to vibrate with the helicopter's normal rhythms. In the original factory installation, the clearance between the down lock and the collective is 0.3 inches. This is the second known accident where the collective lock has inadvertently engaged in flight with this particular after market avionics panel installed. The manufacturer of the aftermarket avionics panel provided installation information indicating that maintenance personnel must bend the collective locking plate such that the locking plate will spring away from the collective lock button. Examination of the accident aircraft’s locking plate indicated that the locking plate bend was likely reversed, allowing the locking plate to spring toward the lock button. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2004_LAX04LA254.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.