NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX05CA127
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's inadequate compensation for a gusting crosswind and his failure to maintain directional control.
Factual narrative
On March 30, 2005, about 1050 Pacific standard time, a Cessna 172L, N7832G, veered off runway 8R and nosed over after touchdown at Chino Airport (CNO), Chino, California. Alliance International Aviation operated the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The private pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. The cross-country flight departed Henderson Executive Airport (HND), Las Vegas, Nevada, about 0845, with a planned destination of Chino. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. The pilot submitted a Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report (NTSB Form 6120.1/2). He stated that he checked the Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS) for Chino, which indicated that a runway change was in progress and the winds were at 20 knots. About 10 miles outside of CNO he contacted tower personnel and requested, and received, a clearance to land on runway 8. Tower personnel informed him that winds were 040 degrees at 20 knots. During the approach the pilot said he had to "apply significant right aileron" in order to maintain the runway heading. After turning onto final, he input "significant left aileron" in order to maintain the runway heading, and applied right rudder to keep the nose of the airplane in line with the direction of travel. The pilot noted his airspeed at 70 knots indicated airspeed (KIAS), and added 10 degrees of flaps. As he got closer to the runway, he didn't feel comfortable with the landing setup. He initiated a go-around and set up for another landing. During the second approach, the pilot extended the downwind leg and increased the airspeed to 80 KIAS. He requested a wind check; tower personnel reported winds from 040 degrees at 22 knots, gusting to 30 knots. He was able to maintain a stabilized approach and continued the landing. Upon touchdown, he "felt a gust of wind" and noted that the airplane's right wing dipped down and the nose pitched forward. The propeller struck the runway; the airplane veered to the right of the runway, and ultimately nosed over, leaving the airplane inverted. The pilot stated that the airplane and engine had no mechanical failures or malfunctions prior to the accident. The routine aviation surface weather (METAR) report from Chino Airport, at 1053, reported winds from 050 degrees (variable from 020 degrees to 080 degrees) at 14 knots, gusting to 22 knots, with 10 miles visibility. The METAR, at 1153, reported winds from 060 degrees at 13 knots, gusting to 24 knots. Airport management personnel indicated that at the time of the accident the winds were from 040 degrees, with no wind velocity reported. The airplane veered off the runway and nosed over during the landing rollout. The pilot's first landing attempt was unsuccessful due to an unstabilized approach in a gusty crosswind condition. The pilot was able to maintain a stabilized approach during the second landing. The pilot reported that after touchdown the airplane was struck by a gust of wind. The right wing dipped down, the nose pitched forward, and the propeller struck the runway. The airplane veered off the runway and came to rest inverted. Tower personnel reported winds from 040 degrees at 22 knots, gusting to 30 knots, at the time of the accident. The pilot stated that the airplane and engine had no mechanical failures or malfunctions prior to the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_LAX05CA127.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around, unstabilized approach). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
Utilizing Deep Learning to Predict Unstabilized Approaches for General Aviation Aircraft
Unstabilized approaches pose a major hazard for general aviation aircraft. In the period from 2009 to 2019, 3,257 general aviation accidents occurred during the landing phase of flight in which loss o…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗