LAX05LA251
2005-07-30 · San Diego, California, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport SEE
Current FAA registration · N9468X
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 210A
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR I0-470 SERIES (260 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19610203
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AD26F8
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to ensure that the landing gear was fully extended prior to landing. A contributing factor was the pilot's diverted attention.
Factual narrative
On July 30, 2005, about 2002 Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 210A, N9468X, landed on runway 27R at the Gillespie Field, San Diego, California, with the landing gear partially extended. During rollout, the landing gear collapsed. The airplane was owned by a private individual, and it was substantially damaged. The commercial pilot was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the personal flight, and no flight plan had been filed. The flight was performed under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91, and it originated from Long Beach, California, about 1730. The pilot reported to the National Transportation Safety Board investigator that earlier during the week the landing gear had been examined. Thereafter, he flew the borrowed airplane to Long Beach. No evidence of a mechanical malfunction was noted with the landing gear system during his takeoff from Long Beach. According to the pilot, on approach to the Gillespie Field he was distracted, and he did not observe whether the green gear down light was illuminating after he extended the landing gear. When the pilot reduced the throttle during the approach, he did not hear any gear warning horn. During the landing rollout, the partially extended landing gear collapsed, and the horizontal stabilizer bent upon impacting the runway. In the pilot's completed "Aircraft Accident Report" he indicated that during his approach for landing he was advised of another airplane ahead and below his position. The pilot reported that he was unable to locate the other airplane until he was on final approach. The other airplane made a long landing on the runway, which resulted in the accident pilot adding engine power for a possible go-around. The pilot reported "at that moment" the other airplane turned off the runway, and he was cleared to land. The pilot closed the throttle, flared, and touched down on the main wheels. Shortly after that he allowed the nose wheel to touch down, and the main landing gear collapsed. The airport manager reported to the National Transportation Safety Board investigator that under her direction the accident airplane was removed from the runway. A crane hoisted the airplane up and the landing gear was extended. The airplane was rolled off the runway without further difficulty. On August 8, 2005, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) coordinator verbally reported to the Safety Board investigator that the airplane had been examined. The landing gear was hydraulically raised and lowered. No anomalies were noted with its operation. The landing gear warning horn system was also functionally examined, and it operated normally. The partially extended landing gear collapsed during rollout on the runway. No evidence of a mechanical malfunction was noted with the landing gear system during the pilot's flight. The pilot said that on approach he was distracted while looking for another airplane, and he did not observe whether the green gear down light was illuminated after he extended the landing gear. He increased engine power in anticipation of performing a go-around, then located the other airplane, whereupon he closed the throttle and landed. Seconds later during rollout, the airplane's landing gear collapsed. Airport management reported that the airplane was subsequently hoisted up by a crane, the landing gear was manually extended into the locked position, and the airplane was rolled off the runway. The landing gear extension system and the related gear warning horn were functionally examined after the accident with no anomalies found. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_LAX05LA251.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…