LAX06LA109
2006-02-12 · Phoenix, Arizona, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
a loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On February 12, 2006, about 1205 mountain standard time, a SIAI-Marchetti S.205/22R, N981WA, experienced a loss of engine power in the takeoff initial climb and collided with obstacles and terrain near Phoenix, Arizona. A private individual was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot and one passenger sustained minor injuries, and one passenger was not injured. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The local personal flight departed Phoenix Deer Valley Airport about 1203. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. The approximate global positioning system (GPS) coordinates of the primary wreckage were 33 degrees 45 minutes north latitude and 112 degrees 0 minutes west longitude. Between 400 and 500 feet above ground level (agl) during the takeoff climb, the engine quit, started again, and then quit again. The left wing clipped the median during an emergency landing on a roadway. The engine was a Franklin 6A-350-C1, serial number 5520-3. Investigators examined the wreckage at Air Transport, Phoenix, Arizona, on April 25, 2006, under the supervision of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Investigators removed the engine. They slung it from a hoist, and removed the top spark plugs. All spark plugs were clean with no mechanical deformation. The spark plug electrodes were elliptical and gray, which corresponded to normal operation according to the Champion Aviation Check-A-Plug AV-27 Chart. A borescope inspection revealed no mechanical deformation on the valves, cylinder walls, or internal cylinder head. Investigators manually rotated the crankshaft with the propeller. The crankshaft rotated freely, and the valves moved approximately the same amount of lift in firing order. The gears in the accessory case turned freely. Investigators obtained thumb compression on all cylinders in firing order. Investigators manually rotated the magnetos, and neither magneto produced spark at any post. The National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge (IIC) sent the magnetos to Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM). TCM personnel examined the magnetos under the supervision of the IIC at the factory in Mobile, Alabama, on March 2, 2007. The left-hand magneto was intact and undamaged. The drive gear was secure, and the teeth were undamaged. The magneto shaft turned freely by hand, and the impulse coupling engaged. The distributor block, contact points, and condenser were intact and undamaged; their analyst indicated that they exhibited normal operating signatures. The analyst installed the magneto on a test bench, and it produced a blue spark across a 7 mm gap through the full range of test bench rpm. The right-hand magneto was intact and undamaged. The drive gear was secure, and the teeth were undamaged. The magneto shaft turned freely by hand. The distributor block, contact points, and condenser were intact and undamaged. The contact point gap was below the minimum specification. The analyst installed the magneto on a test bench, and it produced a blue spark across a 7 mm gap through the full range of test bench rpm. The airplane collided with obstacles and terrain during a forced landing following a loss of engine power. Between 400 and 500 feet above ground level (agl) during the takeoff climb, the engine lost power, started again, and then lost power again. The airplane made an emergency landing on a roadway and the left wing clipped the median. An initial examination of the engine revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation except that both of the magnetos did not spark at any post when manually rotated. A second examination of the magnetos occurred at the manufacturer's facilities. They mounted the magnetos to a test stand. The magnetos produced a blue spark across a 7 mm gap through the full range of test bench rpm. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2006_LAX06LA109.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…