LAX06LA242
2006-07-23 · Hemet, California, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport HMT
Current FAA registration · N9886M
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 182P
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR O-470 SERIES (230 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19760511
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S ADCC12
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the shaking and backfiring of the engine for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On July 23, 2006, about 1000 Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 182P airplane, N9886M, sustained substantial damage during a precautionary landing on a dirt strip near Hemet, California. The private pilot and the passenger were uninjured. The pilot operated the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91 as a personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a flight plan was not filed for the flight that departed Upland, California, at 0930. The flight was destined for the Hemet-Ryan Airport (HMT), Hemet. According to the written statement provided by the pilot, he departed Upland and headed to Hemet. As the flight neared the Hemet area at 2,500 feet, the pilot started "feeling a couple of violent shakes of the engine, then backfiring." He decreased the power to 15 inches of manifold pressure to reduce the shaking and backfiring and then checked the fuel selector and ensured it was selected to both fuel tanks. Additionally, he verified that the magnetos were both selected, and that the propeller and mixture controls were full forward. The pilot kept the engine power set at 15 inches of manifold pressure and looked for a suitable landing site. The pilot noted a dirt strip next to a highway and began his descent. He touched down with both main landing gear and kept the nose wheel up and applied left rudder to offset the crosswind, until both the elevator and rudder lost control authority. With the crosswind, the airplane was blown off of the strip into soft plowed dirt. The nose landing gear dug into the dirt and collapsed. The right wing impacted the ground during the event resulting in substantial structural damage to the right wing and fuselage. According to the Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report (NTSB Form 6120.1/2), the airplane underwent its last annual inspection on June 23, 2006, at an aircraft total time of 6,817.5 hours. The airplane accumulated 27 hours since that inspection. The airplane was transported by Aircraftsman to their facility in Chino, California. According to the personnel at Aircraftsman, and to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector who examined the airplane following the event, the engine, mounted on the accident airplane, was test run. The Continental O-470-S engine produced full power and no anomalies were noted. The magnetos were tested with normal drops of 75 rpm per magneto noted. Following the engine test run, the FAA inspector oversaw the teardown examination of the carburetor. The floats were properly set and the bowl and inlet screen were clear and free from debris. No anomalies were noted that would have resulted in the backfiring and engine shakes. The weather observation facility located at the Riverside Airport, approximately 11 miles northwest of the accident site, reported the following conditions at 0955: wind from 280 degrees at 11 knots; visibility 35 statute miles; a few clouds at 8,000 feet, broken clouds at 13,000 feet and 18,000 feet; temperature 36 degrees Celsius; dew point 17 degrees Celsius; and an altimeter setting of 29.86 inches of Mercury. Review of a carburetor icing probability chart with the temperature and dew point noted above revealed that a chance of light carburetor icing probability existed at cruise or descent power. The airplane's nose landing gear collapsed and the right wing impacted terrain during a precautionary landing on a dirt strip. The pilot said that as the flight neared its intended destination, the airplane's engine began to shake violently and backfire. The pilot reduced power to lessen the effects of the shaking and backfiring. He confirmed that the fuel selector, magnetos, and engine controls were properly set and set up for an off airport landing on a dirt strip. During the landing roll, the airplane drifted off the dirt strip due to a crosswind. The nose landing gear dug into the soft dirt adjacent to the field and collapsed. A post accident test run of the engine and examination of the carburetor revealed no anomalies that would have resulted in the reported engine shake and backfire. Review of a carburetor icing probability chart showed that with the temperature and dew point that existed at the time of the accident, a chance of light carburetor icing probability existed at cruise or descent power. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2006_LAX06LA242.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…