LAX07CA226
2007-07-23 · Taylor, Arizona, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport TYL
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the student pilot's misjudged landing flare and inadequate recovery from a bounced landing that resulted in a hard landing and a loss of directional control.
Factual narrative
On July 23, 2007, about 0930 mountain standard time, a Beech C23, N6005X, collided with terrain during an attempted go-around at Taylor Airport, Taylor, Arizona. The student pilot was operating the borrowed airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot, the sole occupant was not injured; the airplane was destroyed. The local area solo instructional flight departed Taylor about 0920. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. The pilot stated in a written report that he had flown for 50 minutes with his certified flight instructor (CFI) prior to the accident flight. After successful completion of air work, and four takeoff and landings, the CFI signed the student's logbook for solo flight and exited the airplane. The pilot stated that he checked weather using the automated weather observation system (AWOS) and found winds to be calm with no ceilings. He then took off from runway 21, and during the turn to crosswind, encountered rain. To avoid the rain he elected to extend his downwind; however, the rain obscured his vision. He turned onto the base leg and discovered he had turned too soon. He elected to continue with the landing at a steeper than usual approach angle. He noted increased rain activity to the east of the runway, and observed the air speed on final to be between 75 and 80 knots. He flared high and the airplane bounced after it made contact with the runway. The airplane then veered to the left and the pilot applied full power. The left landing gear struck weeds along the runway edge; the pilot lowered the nose, and applied right rudder. The airplane continued to strike weeds adjacent to the runway. The airplane then veered to the right and flew for approximately 100 feet before the right main landing gear struck the runway and was sheared off. The left main landing gear then impacted soft mud and was also sheared off. The airplane came to rest and the pilot immediately exited. The airplane was consumed by post impact fire. The CFI was interviewed by an National Transportation Safety Board investigator. He stated that he observed the airplane in the pattern, and judged it to be high on final. He did not observe rain in the vicinity, but noted that during this time of year, it was possible to encounter "sprinkles" in the pattern, and surmised this was the reason for the high approach. The closest official weather observation station was Show Low, Arizona, located about 13 nm southeast of Taylor at an elevation of 6,415 feet msl. An aviation routine weather report (METAR) for Show Low was issued at 0930. It stated: winds from 090 degrees at 6 knots; visibility 10 statute miles; skies, few clouds 4,900 feet, broken clouds 9,000 feet; temperature 21 degrees Celsius; dew point 14 degrees Celsius; altimeter 30.31 inches of mercury; lightning distant, southwest and northwest. The pilot stated that the airplane and engine had no mechanical failures or malfunctions during the flight. The student pilot flared too high, the airplane landed hard, and bounced down the runway in a porpoise before it veered off the runway into brush, caught fire, and was consumed in the post impact fire. The student had flown with his certified flight instructor (CFI) for about 50 minutes before he was signed off to complete a solo flight. The accident occurred on his first landing. While in the pattern, the student pilot attempted to avoid rain and shortened his downwind leg. After turning onto the base leg he discovered that he had turned too soon. He decided to continue the landing at a steeper than normal approach angle and a higher airspeed. He said he misjudged the flare and the airplane landed hard and bounced into the air. It then porpoised down the runway as it veered off to the left into the brush on the side of the runway. Both main landing gear were sheared off during the accident sequence. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2007_LAX07CA226.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…